Visual and Functional Assessment in Low Vision Patients

June 12, 2019 updated by: University of Oxford

A Randomised Crossover Study to Assess the Usability of Two New Vision Tests in Patients With Low Vision, and Relationship of the Measures to Daily Living Tasks.

Vision testing is a fundamental part of every optometry and ophthalmology assessment. Traditional vision testing charts are not able to measure vision below a certain level. Vision in this range is classified as counting fingers (CF), hand movements (HM) and light perception (LP). These measures are not very accurate or easily quantifiable. They are also poorly understood in terms of impact on quality of life. This study aims to assess new methods for measuring the vision of patients with very low vision.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Assessing very low vision accurately is becoming increasingly important with the increase in research in this area, such as using retinal implants to restore vision. Without being able to accurately measure the change in vision before and after treatment, it is not possible to fully assess the effect of treatment.

The Freiburg Vision Test (FrACT) is a computer based test developed to assess patients down to the LP level. It has been used in research in recent years. The FrACT is suitable for research but is not suitable for a clinical setting. The Berkeley Rudimentary Vision Test (BRVT) works on a similar principal as the FrACT but consists of hand held cards shown to the patient. Little work has been completed on how well the BRVT test works. Results from FrACT and BRVT will be compared in a group of patients with very low vision. This is important to establish how easily research results can be applied to a clinical setting.

Patients will also be asked to complete a daily living survey to better understand the impact of such poor vision on the ability to carry out day to day tasks. This understanding will help guide low vision services for patients as well as help direct low vision research to achieve a useful level of functional vision.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with low vision attending outpatient clinics in Oxford Eye Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Snellen VA or equivalent ≤ 6/60 in both eyes
  • Patient has capacity to give consent and to undertake vision tests

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of functional vision loss
  • Unwilling and/or unable to sign informed consent and complete the vision tests

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Order of vision tests 1
Undergo testing with BRVT first, FrACT second.
Order of vision tests 2
Undergo testing with FrACT first, BRVT second.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Comparison of VA measured with FrACT and BRVT vision tests
Time Frame: Single visit
Single visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship between VA and ability to carry out daily living tasks.
Time Frame: Single time point
Results from a daily living skills survey will be related to VA measured by FrACT testing.
Single time point

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 12, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Age-related Macular Degeneration

3
Subscribe