The Effect of rTMS Treatment on Alzheimer's and Sleep Quality (rTMS)

February 22, 2021 updated by: Dr. Zahra Kazem-Moussavi

Investigating the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease and on Sleep Quality

This research is being conducted to study whether rTMS (repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) could be potentially used as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease. rTMS is a technique that stimulates the brain by rapidly switching a magnetic field in a coil placed over your head. Prior to rTMS, single pulse TMS will be used to localize the specific brain region that we are interested in.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Upon meeting the inclusion criteria and providing informed consent, each participant will complete a series of cognitive assessments and rTMS treatments at the TMS Lab at Riverview Health Center. Each treatment session will involve implementing rTMS, while the patient is involved in a cognitive exercise such as naming object or action. The study sessions will be scheduled as follows: Block 1: 5 days/week for two weeks followed by 2 days a week for 1 week, followed by once a week for 1 week (total of 13 treatments); Pause: 4 weeks of no treatment; and Block 2: another 13 sessions of treatment with the same pattern as Block 1. One of these two sets of treatment (Block 1 or Block 2) will be sham and one will be real. Sham treatment sessions are identical to real treatment sessions, except that there is no magnetic stimulation. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either sham or real treatment first. The purpose of sham treatment is to have a control group data that the plausible improvement as a result of rTMS can be compared to. By designing two sets of sham-real or real-sham treatment sessions, every participant will receive a real treatment, while we will also have control data.

The cognitive assessments will be done at the baseline, and then on weekly basis. A subgroup of the study population will be recruited for investigating the second objective: effect of rTMS on sleep quality. Those patients will be required to sign a second consent; then, the patients will go through full-night sleep study at Misericordia Health Center at the same time intervals as their cognitive assessments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3C 1A2
        • Misericordia Health Center
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3L 2P4
        • Riverview Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals must have a MoCA score between 5 and 26, indicating mild cognitive impairment or dementia.
  • Participants must have probable early or moderate Alzheimer's disease as confirmed by their treating neurologist or psychiatrist, and/or by the co-investigators.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A recent (the last 3 months) history of stroke, recent (the last 3 months) head injury and loss of consciousness, any history of epilepsy, seizures, multiple sclerosis (MS), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), or Autism.
  • Recent changes in medication (i.e. patients should be in a relatively stable phase of disease).
  • The presence of metallic objects in the body; dental implants are fine but people with pacemakers are to be excluded; basically anything that is unsafe under MRI would be considered unsafe for TMS application.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: rTMS with sham coil
rTMS real-sham and rTMS sham-real interventions. Each patient will receive both real and sham treatment in two different blocks of time. The assessments after the sham treatment will serve as placebo effect compared to those after real treatment.
In this intervention patients receive 4 weeks of rTMS treatment with real coil and then 4 weeks of treatment with sham coil; there will be 4 weeks of break between the two blocks of treatment.
In this intervention patients receive 4 weeks of rTMS treatment with sham coil and then 4 weeks of treatment with real coil; there will be 4 weeks of break between the two blocks of treatment.
Active Comparator: rTMS with real coil
rTMS real-sham and rTMS sham-real interventions. Each patient will receive both real and sham treatment in two different blocks of time. The assessments after the sham treatment will serve as placebo effect compared to those after real treatment.
In this intervention patients receive 4 weeks of rTMS treatment with real coil and then 4 weeks of treatment with sham coil; there will be 4 weeks of break between the two blocks of treatment.
In this intervention patients receive 4 weeks of rTMS treatment with sham coil and then 4 weeks of treatment with real coil; there will be 4 weeks of break between the two blocks of treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Improvement Measured Using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 2 weeks after the start of treatment
We anticipate to see a cognitive improvement as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) after two weeks of applying rTMS. This assessment tool gives a score from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores representing better cognitive ability.
Change between baseline and 2 weeks after the start of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in Sleep Quality
Time Frame: After four weeks after the start of treatment
We anticipate to see an improvement on the sleep quality of the patients (assessed by EEG waves during sleep) after 4 weeks of rTMS treatment.
After four weeks after the start of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zahra Kazem-Moussavi, Ph.D., University of Manitoba

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on rTMS real-sham

3
Subscribe