A Study of PCI-32765 (Ibrutinib) in Combination With Either Bendamustine and Rituximab or Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Participants With Previously Treated Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (SELENE)

August 16, 2023 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, PCI-32765 (Ibrutinib), in Combination With Either Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) or Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CHOP) in Subjects With Previously Treated Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCI-32765 (ibrutinib) administered in combination with either bendamustine and rituximab (BR) or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in adult participants with previously treated indolent Non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized (individuals assigned to study treatment by chance), double-blind (individuals and study personnel will not know the identity of study treatments), placebo (an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial)-controlled study in approximately 400 adult participants with follicular lymphoma or marginal zone lymphoma. The study will include the following phases: Screening, Treatment, and a Post-treatment Follow-up. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either treatment Arm A (background immune-chemotherapy + placebo) or treatment Arm B (background immune-chemotherapy + 560 milligram [mg] of ibrutinib). All participants will receive 6 cycles of background immune-chemotherapy with either BR or R-CHOP in combination with either placebo (Arm A) or ibrutinib (Arm B). Selection of background immune-chemotherapy will be based on prior treatment history and cardiac function. After completion of background immune-chemotherapy, study drug (ibrutinib or placebo) will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end, whichever comes first. Assessment of tumor response and progression will be conducted in accordance with the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Serial pharmacokinetic (study of what a drug does to the body) blood samples will be collected. Safety will be assessed throughout the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

405

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
      • Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
      • Cordoba, Argentina
      • La Capital, Argentina
      • Mendoza, Argentina
      • Santa Fe, Argentina
      • Adelaide, Australia
      • Fitzroy, Australia
      • Heidelberg, Australia
      • South Brisbane, Australia
      • Wahroonga, Australia
      • Westmead, Australia
      • Anderlecht, Belgium
      • Edegem, Belgium
      • Gent, Belgium
      • Leuven, Belgium
      • Namur, Belgium
      • Wilrijk, Belgium
      • Porto Alegre, Brazil
      • Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
      • Salvador, Brazil
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil
      • São Paulo, Brazil
      • Beijing, China
      • Chengdu, China
      • Guangzhou, China
      • Hangzhou, China
      • Harbin, China
      • Nanjing, China
      • Shanghai, China
      • Tianjin, China
      • Nice Cedex 2, France
      • Paris, France
      • Pessac, France
      • Pierre Benite, France
      • Rennes, France
      • Berlin, Germany
      • Gießen, Germany
      • Göttingen, Germany
      • Ludwigshafen, Rp, Germany
      • Magdeburg, Germany
      • Mainz, Germany
      • Munchen, Germany
      • Wiesbaden, Germany
      • Hadera, Israel
      • Haifa, Israel
      • Jerusalem, Israel
      • Nahariya, Israel
      • Netanya, Israel
      • Petah Tikva, Israel
      • Ramat Gan, Israel
      • Chuo-Ku, Japan
      • Hiroshima-shi, Japan
      • Isehara, Japan
      • Kobe, Japan
      • Nagoya-shi, Japan
      • Osaka-Sayama-shi, Japan
      • Sapporo-shi, Japan
      • Sendai-shi, Japan
      • Suita-shi, Japan
      • Tokyo, Japan
      • Jeollanam-do, Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
      • Gdynia, Poland
      • Olsztyn, Poland
      • Warszawa, Poland
      • Bayamon, Puerto Rico
      • Ponce, Puerto Rico
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico
      • Krasnodar, Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
      • Nizny Novgorod, Russian Federation
      • Petrozavodsk, Russian Federation
      • Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation
      • Rostov-On-Don, Russian Federation
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
      • Syktyvkar, Russian Federation
      • Volgograd, Russian Federation
      • Barcelona, Spain
      • Madrid, Spain
      • Pozuelo de Alarcon, Spain
      • Salamanca, Spain
      • Göteborg, Sweden
      • Linköping, Sweden
      • Luleå, Sweden
      • Uppsala, Sweden
      • Ankara, Turkey
      • Antalya, Turkey
      • Istanbul, Turkey
      • Izmir, Turkey
      • Kayseri, Turkey
      • Cherkasy, Ukraine
      • Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
      • Khmelnitskiy, Ukraine
      • Kiev, Ukraine
      • Lviv, Ukraine
      • Uzhgorod, Ukraine
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom
      • Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
      • Plymouth, United Kingdom
      • Portsmouth, United Kingdom
      • Sutton, United Kingdom
      • Swansea, United Kingdom
    • Arizona
      • Gilbert, Arizona, United States
    • California
      • Campbell, California, United States
      • Duarte, California, United States
      • La Jolla, California, United States
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
      • Orange, California, United States
    • Florida
      • Ocala, Florida, United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
      • Maywood, Illinois, United States
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
    • Kansas
      • Westwood, Kansas, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States
    • Louisiana
      • Lafayette, Louisiana, United States
    • Maine
      • Scarborough, Maine, United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
      • Battle Creek, Michigan, United States
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
    • New Jersey
      • Denville, New Jersey, United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Hickory, North Carolina, United States
      • Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States
    • Oregon
      • Bend, Oregon, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States
      • Lubbock, Texas, United States
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of B-cell indolent Non-Hodgkin lymphoma with histological subtype limited to follicular lymphoma or marginal zone lymphoma, at initial diagnosis and without evidence of pathological transformation or clinical signs suggesting transformation
  • At least 1 prior treatment with a CD20 antibody combination chemo-immunotherapy regimen
  • Disease that has relapsed or was refractory after prior chemo-immunotherapy
  • At least 1 measurable site of disease according to Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma 2007
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status grade 0 or 1
  • Laboratory values within protocol-defined parameters
  • Agrees to protocol-defined use of effective contraception
  • Men must agree not to donate sperm during and after the study for 6 months after the last dose of bendamustine, 12 months after the last dose of rituximab, or 3 months after the last dose of study medication, whichever is later
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test at Screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment according to protocol-defined criteria
  • Unable to receive background chemotherapy based on prior treatment history and cardiac function
  • Known central nervous system lymphoma
  • Diagnosed or treated for malignancy other than indolent Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • History of stroke or intracranial hemorrhage within 6 months prior to randomization
  • Requires anticoagulation with warfarin or equivalent Vitamin K antagonists
  • Requires treatment with strong CYP3A inhibitors
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
  • Known history of human immunodeficiency virus or active hepatitis C virus (HCV; ribonucleic acid [RNA] polymerase chain reaction [PCR]-positive) or active hepatitis B virus (HBV; DNA PCR-positive) infection or any uncontrolled active systemic infection requiring intravenous antibiotics
  • Any life-threatening illness, medical condition, or organ system dysfunction which, in the Investigator's opinion, could compromise the participant's safety, interfere with the absorption or metabolism of ibrutinib capsules, or put the study outcomes at undue risk
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Treatment Arm A
Treatment Arm A = background immune-chemotherapy (bendamustine and rituximab [BR] or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [R-CHOP]) for 6 cycles + placebo.
90 milligram per meter square (mg/m^2) administered intravenously on Days 1 to 2 of Cycles 1 to 6.
375 mg/m^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycles 1 to 6.
750 mg/m^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycles 1 to 6.
50 mg/m^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycles 1 to 6.
1.4 mg/m^2 (maximum total 2 mg) administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycles 1 to 6.
100 mg administered orally on Days 1 to 5 of Cycles 1 to 6.
Placebo (4 capsules) matched to ibrutinib administered orally once daily, continuously starting on Cycle 1, Day 1.
Experimental: Treatment Arm B
Treatment Arm B = background immune-chemotherapy (BR or R-CHOP) for 6 cycles + PCI-32765 (Ibrutinib).
90 milligram per meter square (mg/m^2) administered intravenously on Days 1 to 2 of Cycles 1 to 6.
375 mg/m^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycles 1 to 6.
750 mg/m^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycles 1 to 6.
50 mg/m^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycles 1 to 6.
1.4 mg/m^2 (maximum total 2 mg) administered intravenously on Day 1 of Cycles 1 to 6.
100 mg administered orally on Days 1 to 5 of Cycles 1 to 6.
560 mg (4*140 mg) capsules administered orally once daily, continuously starting on Cycle 1, Day 1.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Analysis: Progression Free Survival (PFS): Stratified Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
PFS was defined as duration (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or relapse from complete response (CR) or death, whichever was first reported. PFS was assessed by the investigator based on the 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Disease progression was defined as any new lesion or increase by greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) of previously involved sites from nadir disease progression criteria: Appearance of new nodal lesion 1.5 centimeters (cm) in any axis, 50% increase in sum of product of diameters (SPD) of greater than (>) 1 node or 50% increase in longest diameter of previously identified node 1 cm in short axis. Participants who were progression-free and alive or had unknown status were censored at the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Stratification factors were used for the analysis.
Up to 8 years
Supplementary Analysis: Progression Free Survival: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL)
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
PFS in MZL participants was defined as duration (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or relapse from CR or death, whichever was first reported. PFS was assessed by the investigator based on the 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Disease progression was defined as any new lesion or increase by >=50% of previously involved sites from nadir disease progression criteria: Appearance of new nodal lesion 1.5 cm in any axis, 50% increase in SPD of >1 node or 50% increase in longest diameter of previously identified node 1 cm in short axis. Participants who were progression-free and alive or had unknown status were censored at the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. For this outcome measure, unstratified analysis was performed on participants with MZL.
Up to 8 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Analysis: Overall Survival (OS): Stratified Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
OS was defined as the interval (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of the participant's death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Stratification factors were used for the analysis.
Up to 8 years
Supplementary Analysis: Overall Survival: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
OS in MZL participants was defined as the interval (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of the participant's death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. For this outcome measure, unstratified analysis was performed on participants with MZL.
Up to 8 years
Primary Analysis: Complete Response Rate (CRR): Stratified Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
CRR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR); (based on investigator assessment) on or prior to the initiation of subsequent antilymphoma therapy. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if positron emission tomography (PET) negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Stratification factors were used for the analysis.
Up to 8 years
Supplementary Analysis: Complete Response Rate: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
CRR in MZL participants was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR (based on investigator assessment) on or prior to the initiation of subsequent antilymphoma therapy. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. For this outcome measure, unstratified analysis was performed on participants with MZL.
Up to 8 years
Primary Analysis: Overall Response Rate (ORR): Stratified Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR or partial response (PR). Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Criteria for PR: >=50% decrease in sum of the diameter of all target lesions compared with baseline, in absence of new lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Stratification factors were used for the analysis.
Up to 8 years
Supplementary Analysis: Overall Response Rate: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
ORR in MZL participants was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR or PR. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Criteria for PR: >=50% decrease in sum of the diameter of all target lesions compared with baseline, in absence of new lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. For this outcome measure, unstratified analysis was performed on participants with MZL.
Up to 8 years
Primary Analysis: Duration of Response (DOR): Stratified Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
DOR was defined as the interval (in months) between the date of initial documentation of response (CR or PR) and the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (or relapse for participants who experienced CR during the study) or death, whichever occurred first. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Criteria for PR: >=50% decrease in sum of the diameter of all target lesions compared with baseline, in absence of new lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Stratification factors were used for the analysis.
Up to 8 years
Supplementary Analysis: Duration of Response: Unstratified Analysis - Participants With MZL
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
DOR in MZL participants was defined as the interval (in months) between the date of initial documentation of response (CR or PR) and the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (or relapse for participants who experienced CR during the study) or death, whichever occurred first. Criteria for CR: disappearance of all evidence of disease; mass of any size permitted if PET negative; regression to normal size on CT; spleen and liver: not palpable, nodules disappeared; bone marrow: infiltrate cleared on repeat biopsy and no new sites of disease detected during assessment. Criteria for PR: >=50% decrease in sum of the diameter of all target lesions compared with baseline, in absence of new lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. For this outcome measure, unstratified analysis was performed on participants with MZL.
Up to 8 years
Primary Analysis: Time to Worsening (TTW) in the Lymphoma (Lym) Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma Subscale (FACT-LymS) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
Time-to-worsening in the Lymphoma subscale of the FACT-Lym was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the start date of the worsening of participant symptoms. Worsening was defined by a 5-point decrease from baseline in participant symptoms. FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale contains 15 questions, scores from 0 to 4 for each question (0 = not at all, 1 = a little bit, 2 = some what, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much, where the higher score indicated worse condition). Lymphoma subscale score is the total of reverse scores, range 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Up to 8 years
Supplementary Analysis: Time to Worsening (TTW) in the Lymphoma (Lym) Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma Subscale (FACT-LymS) Questionnaire: Participants With MZL
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
TTW in MZL participants in the Lymphoma subscale of the FACT-Lym was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the start date of the worsening of participant symptoms. Worsening was defined by a 5-point decrease from baseline in participant symptoms. FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale contains 15 questions, scores from 0 to 4 for each question (0 = not at all, 1 = a little bit, 2 = some what, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much, where the higher score indicated worse condition). Lymphoma subscale score is the total of reverse scores, range 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Up to 8 years
Primary Analysis: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
Number of participants with TEAEs were reported. Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAEs were defined as adverse events with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment up to and including 30 days after date of last dose of study medication.
Up to 8 years
Supplementary Analysis: Number of Participants With TEAEs: Participants With MZL
Time Frame: Up to 8 years
Number of MZL participants with TEAEs were reported. AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAEs were defined as adverse events with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment up to and including 30 days after date of last dose of study medication.
Up to 8 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

November 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on Bendamustine

3
Subscribe