Comparative Effectiveness Research to Enhance Outcomes in African-Americans With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

May 20, 2014 updated by: Bharati Prasad, University of Illinois at Chicago

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is under-diagnosed and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Laboratory-based overnight polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard in clinical practice to diagnose OSA but has availability, cost, and resource limitations. In the last decade, an alternative diagnostic strategy, Portable Monitoring (PM) has emerged with the goal of reducing expense and delays in clinical management. In contrast to PSG, PM maybe performed unattended in homes, utilize different neurophysiologic and cardiorespiratory parameters, and may synthesize these data differently. PM is feasible and is approved by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the United States. However, the diagnostic utility of PM in minority and underserved populations is not defined.

African-Americans are more severely affected by hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) than other ethnic groups and OSA is more common in this population. OSA is a treatable cause of hypertension. Despite this the impact of timely interventions for OSA on health outcomes and risk reduction specific to African Americans is unknown.

Purpose of this research: In view of the vulnerability of this population and the potential for improvement in healthcare access for OSA with home-based diagnosis, this study aims to establish the feasibility and identify the potential advantages and limitations of home-based diagnosis of OSA in a high-risk urban African-American population including veterans with frequently limited access to healthcare.

Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that home-based PM is not inferior to standard laboratory-based PSG in effectively diagnosing OSA in urban African Americans.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that home-based PM is not inferior to standard laboratory-based PSG in effectively diagnosing OSA in urban African Americans.

The specific aims of this project are:

Primary Aims: Aim 1. To compare the validity of a comprehensive and current PM technology to standard in-laboratory full PSG

1a) to measure and compare diagnostic accuracy of home-based PM with laboratory-PSG

  1. b) to measure and compare diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous laboratory-based PM with laboratory-PSG Aim 2. To test the reliability and examine the applicability of PM in the home-setting
  2. a) to compare diagnostic accuracy of home-based PM with laboratory-based PM

2b) to examine factors associated with technical reliability (data failure rate) of home-based PM 2c) to compare patient satisfaction and preference of testing in home-setting to laboratory-setting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Sleep Science Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and Female African-Americans (age ≥18 years)
  2. Berlin Questionnaire
  3. Ability to understand written and verbal English

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Past treatment of OSA (medical, dental, or surgical)
  2. Other primary sleep disorder(s) by history
  3. Active uncontrolled medical conditions/immobility
  4. Current drug or significant alcohol use
  5. No current residential address or contact phone number

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: OSA testing
Cross-over design, single group/arm Interventions: polysomnography with simultaneous portable monitoring and home portable monitoring administered to each participant in random order.
A device applied over 1 arm (on the wrist and finger), worn overnight by patients to detect OSA.
Other Names:
  • WatchPAT200, Itamar medical Inc.
One attended diagnostic sleep study.
Portable monitoring with WP200 device - applied by participants once at home.
Portable monitoring with WP200 device - applied by technologist once in the laboratory simultaneously with polysomnography.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)
Time Frame: 4 days

AHI is the number of abnormal respiratory events (apneas and hypopneas) per hour of sleep.

AHI on home portable monitor (PM) compared to AHI on laboratory polysomnography (PSG).

4 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical Failure Rate
Time Frame: 4 days
home PM tests that failed to provide technically adequate data for diagnosis. Technical failure(s) were tests where estimated total sleep time (TST) was ≤ 2 hours or portable monitor data of interpretable quality was less than 4 hours per recording.
4 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Prefer Home Testing Over Laboratory Testing
Time Frame: 1 week
Participants indicated which test (PM or PSG) they preferred.
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bharati Prasad, MD, University of Illinois at Chicago

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 28, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on Portable monitoring

3
Subscribe