Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Thermal and Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques of Thoracic Facets' Medial Branches to Manage Thoracic Pain

Nerves in your body transmit signals to and from your brain and the cells in your body. In the event of an injury or disease, these nerves transmit pain. Sometimes, when an injury doesn't heal, chronic pain can develop. One way to treat chronic pain is to interrupt these pain signals. One method of doing this is to use Radio frequency ablation (RFA).

Radio frequency ablation (RFA) is a medical procedure in which heat is generated from high frequency electrical current in order to lesion (burn) nervous tissue. Radiofrequency ablation is used to treat many conditions in several areas of the body including cardiac (heart) as well as chronic pain. Probes (needles) are inserted into the body to a specific location and the electrical current is passed through these needles. This electrical current creates heat in your body and forms small lesions or burns in a specific place. Doctors will use tools, such as fluoroscopy (x-rays) and injections to locate the specific nerves that are transmitting pain and then use the electrical current to destroy those nerves.

Equipment used include generator, built in nerve stimulator, different needles and probes and water cooling system in case of the cooled RFA.

There are several types of probes or needles that are used to transmit energy and create lesions. This study is going to compare 2 types - standard radiofrequency and 'cooled' radiofrequency. The only difference is that the 'cooled' radiofrequency probes have water running through the probe tip, which keeps the tip cool and allows a larger lesion to be made. Since the doctor can't actually see the nerve he is trying to target, the larger lesion should theoretically improve his chances of hitting it. The 'cooling' of the water also allows the temperatures to be lower than what is needed for standard RF. In this study, the investigators would like to compare the differences between standard RFA (90°C) and "cooled" RFA (60°C) ablation techniques and determine if one is better for pain relief.

All of the probes that are used to perform radiofrequency ablation are FDA approved and are commonly used to treat patients with chronic back pain.

Participating in the study involves being randomly assigned to received either standard or cooled RFA. The procedure for both standard and cooled RFA is basically the same. The only difference is with standard RFA, the doctor may perform up to 2 lesions, instead of 1 if they are using cooled RFA.

Both study groups will receive local anesthetic prior to procedure. The treating doctor will use a machine called a C-Arm to take x-rays. These x-rays will guide the doctor to be sure the probes are in the right place. Once the probe placement is confirmed, the doctor will turn on the generator and create the lesion. This process will be repeated depending on how many lesions need to be created.

After the procedure there will be follow up visits at 1, 3 and 6 months. Level of pain, health and recovery information will be collected.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Chronic Thoracic Back Pain
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: c-RFA; Procedure: tRFA

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 16
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Nagy Mekhail; Phone Number: 1-216 445-8329; Email: mekhain@ccf.org

Study Locations

• United States
  • Ohio
    • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
      • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 18 or older
• Chronic thoracic spine mediated back pain of 3 months duration or longer
• Absence of focal neurologic signs or symptoms related to thoracic radiculopathy
• Failure to respond to conservative measures in the form of oral medication and physical therapy
• More than 50% reduction in their pain less than 2 months duration following a series of 2 diagnostic thoracic medial branch blocks of the affected joints using 1 ml of 1% lidocaine in the first procedure and bupivacaine 0.5 % in the second time

Exclusion Criteria:

• Untreated coagulopathy
• Concomitant medical (e.g. uncontrolled cardiac condition) or psychiatric illness (e.g., untreated depression) likely to endanger the patient or compromise treatment outcomes
• Pregnancy
• Malignancy
• Systemic or local infection

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: c-RFA; cooled radiofrequency ablation	Procedure: c-RFA
Active Comparator: t-RFA; thermal radiofrequency ablation	Procedure: tRFA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Pain Score on the visual analogue scale	Change from baseline in pain at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: The Cleveland Clinic
• Collaborators: Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 1, 2014
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 15, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): December 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 21, 2014
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 25, 2014
• First Posted (Estimate): February 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): February 23, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 22, 2023
• Last Verified: February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Back Pain
• Other Study ID Numbers: 13-1073