Is Any Additional Information Gained Regarding Margins Using 3D Tomosynthesis Vs 2D Conventional Digital Imaging When Imaging Operative Breast Specimens?

October 19, 2016 updated by: Jennifer Waldron, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

Is Any Additional Information Gained Regarding Lesion to Margin Measurement Using 3D Tomosynthesis Imaging Versus 2D Conventional Digital Imaging When Imaging Specimens of Breast Tissue Removed at Therapeutic Surgery

Patients who are diagnosed with breast cancer will have surgery to remove the tumour. Where this is a local excision not mastectomy, the tissue removed is sent for x-ray imaging to assess that the abnormality has been removed and give an estimation of the distance from lesion to specimen edge. This allows the surgeon to decide whether to remove more tissue or not at the time. This study is designed to compare whether more accurate information about lesion to margin measurement can be obtained using 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging compared to 2 dimensional conventional digital imaging which is the type of imaging currently used. This has the potential to prevent some patients requiring a second operation to remove more tissue if the margins of the specimen are still involved with tumour.

The study involves x-raying the specimen under both conditions when it arrives from theatre. Only the 2D image will be reviewed at the time as is current practice. The 3D image will be reviewed later and the measurements for lesion to specimen margin compared. The lesion to margin measurement as recorded by the pathologist will be taken as the 'gold standard' and the imaging measurements will also be compared to that.

In theory, the use of 3D tomosynthesis should allow more accurate lesion to margin measurement because 3D can provide better visualisation of the lesion edges by removing the effect of superimposed tissue.

The hypothesis states that the use of 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging should provide better lesion visualisation compared to 2 dimensional conventional digital imaging thus allowing more accurate lesion to margin measurement.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Midlands
      • Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom, B18 7QH
        • Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient requires surgery to remove breast cancer and operative specimen needs to be x-rayed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with breast cancer who need mastectomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging
Breast specimen to be x-rayed using both conditions 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging 2 dimensional conventional digital imaging
Each operative specimen will be imaged twice using each condition
Experimental: 2 dimensional digital imaging
Breast specimens to be x-rayed under both conditions 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging 2 dimensional digital imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shortest distance in mm from visible lesion to specimen margin
Time Frame: 1 year
2D conventional digital imaging - measured at time of surgery and info relayed to surgeon in theatre 3D tomosynthesis imaging - measured later with operator blinded to the 2D measurement Pathological measurement - final measurement used as the 'gold standard'
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Waldron, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 26, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Breast Specimen Imaging Ver3

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging

3
Subscribe