Comparative Study of Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint and Laser Diode. A Randomised Controlled Trial.

July 8, 2014 updated by: Isabel Bejerano Blázquez

Hysteroscopy today is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. In recent years we have used the bipolar energy for resection of polyps by hysteroscopy, becoming a routine clinical practice and universally accepted.

Resection of endometrial polyps laser energy has recently begun to be used with satisfactory results, so studies are needed to analyze these results and compare it with the usual techniques .

This time in advance of medicine, it is appropriate to introduce minimally invasive procedures , allowing resection of endometrial polyps on an outpatient basis without anesthesia and acceptable to most patients.

These procedures assume a lower cost and are associated with a lower surgical risk due to their realization without anesthesia .

Hypothesis: Resection of polyps outpatient laser diode has a similar or superior to that of the bipolar electrode tolerability. The diode laser is a viable , quick , simple technique with a high percentage of resection and high degree of satisfaction of patients

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Main objective: To assess the tolerability of diode laser in the treatment of endometrial polyps using a visual analogue pain scale.

Secondary objectives:

  • Determine if complete resection of polyps is achieved with both methods.
  • Compare the time spent on the removal of the polyp in each of the hysteroscopic methods.
  • To evaluate the safety of the laser diode with respect to the bipolar electrode (vagal syndrome, uterine perforation, infection, bleeding).
  • Assess the recurrence of polyps after 3 months of resection (via hysteroscopy).
  • Compare the degree of patient satisfaction with the different methods.

Design: randomized single blind clinical trial corresponds to an experimental analytical study. The patients randomly into 2 groups will include: Group A bipolar electrode treatment Versapoint and Group B diode laser treatment. Randomization was performed using a random table with 2 groups, generated in Microsoft Office Excel. The sample size needed to detect a difference in visual analog pain scale of a point with respect to the laser diode bipolar electrode is calculated; assuming a standard deviation of 1.75, a sample size of 49 patients in each group (98 would be needed in total), to a level of significance of 5% (0.05 α) with a power of 0.80 (beta 0.20). Assuming a loss of individuals from 5 to 10%

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cordoba, Spain, 14004
        • Reina Sofia University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients previously diagnosed of endometrial polyps that can be resected. The diagnosis will be made hysteroscopically. The patient must be informed about the study, and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the usual exclusion criteria for surgical techniques, pregnant patients, patiens under 18 patients who did not sign the informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: polyps resection with Laser Diode
application of the laser diode by hysteroscopy to remove the endometrial polyp
resection of endometrial polyps by hysteroscopy without anesthesia
Active Comparator: polyps resection with bipolar electrode
application of the bipolar electrode Versapoint by hysteroscopy to remove the endometrial polyp

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To assess the tolerability of the laser diode in the treatment of endometrial polyps using a validated visual analogue pain scale
Time Frame: we we measure pain after resection of endometrial polyps, with 5 minutes for the patient thinks
we we measure pain after resection of endometrial polyps, with 5 minutes for the patient thinks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determine if complete resection of polyps is achieved with both methods.
Time Frame: the duration of the polyp resection, subsequent assessment of the patient and her general condition. Time is measured, between 15 to 30 minutes
the duration of the polyp resection, subsequent assessment of the patient and her general condition. Time is measured, between 15 to 30 minutes
Compare the time spent on the removal of the polyp.
Time Frame: the duration of the polyp resection, subsequent assessment of the patient and her general condition. Time is measured, between 15 to 30 minutes
the duration of the polyp resection, subsequent assessment of the patient and her general condition. Time is measured, between 15 to 30 minutes
To evaluate the safety of both methods
Time Frame: the duration of the polyp resection, subsequent assessment of the patient and her general condition. Time is measured, between 15 to 30 minutes
the duration of the polyp resection, subsequent assessment of the patient and her general condition. Time is measured, between 15 to 30 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assess the recurrence of polyps after 3 months of resection (another hysteroscopy).
Time Frame: 3 months after resection of the polyp, repeat hysteroscopy to assess recurrence, in 10 to 15 minutes. the patient is satisfied if foretaste and whether they would recommend the procedure.
3 months after resection of the polyp, repeat hysteroscopy to assess recurrence, in 10 to 15 minutes. the patient is satisfied if foretaste and whether they would recommend the procedure.
Compare the degree of patient satisfaction with the different methods
Time Frame: 3 months after resection of the polyp, repeat hysteroscopy to assess recurrence, in 10 to 15 minutes. the patient is satisfied if foretaste and whether they would recommend the procedure.
3 months after resection of the polyp, repeat hysteroscopy to assess recurrence, in 10 to 15 minutes. the patient is satisfied if foretaste and whether they would recommend the procedure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: José Eduardo Arjona Berral, Gynecologist, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University Hospital Reina Sofia
  • Principal Investigator: Maria Dolores Lara, Gynecologist, Physician specializing in obstetrics and gynecology.
  • Study Chair: Rafaela Dios Palomares, Engineer, Universidad de Córdoba

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrial Polyps

Clinical Trials on polyps resection with Laser Diode

3
Subscribe