TC-325 (HEMOSPRAY™) VS. CURRENT STANDARD OF CARE IN MANAGING MALIGNANT GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING: A PILOT STUDY TO INFORM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding arising from malignant tumors is increasingly recognized as a result of oncological advances and improved detection methods, and stems from local vessel damage and tumor invasion with associated derangements in the hemostatic system(1, 2). Although conventional endoscopic hemostasis methods improve outcomes in UGIB due to peptic ulcers and other non-variceal benign bleeding lesions of the upper, and perhaps the lower GI tract, data on their use in hemorrhagic, upper or lower gastrointestinal neoplasms are scarce and associated with varying success in initial hemostasis and high rebleeding rates(3-7). Other recognized single or multimodality treatment approaches include radiation therapy, interventional angiography, and surgery. All exhibit disappointing rebleeding rates, and in the case of emergency surgery, high mortality(4, 8-11). Challenges associated with bleeding tumors include hematological derangements such as thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and neutropenia, as well as the endoscopic manipulation of friable, diffusely bleeding surfaces when attempting hemostasis(2, 12, 13). The recent advent of TC-325 (HemosprayTM) to Canada, Europe and Asia - referred henceforth as TC-325 - may provide a highly adapted novel endoscopic hemostatic therapeutic alternative for this refractory clinical entity, with promising uncontrolled observations having just been published by our group(13) and others(14). More robust controlled evaluative data are now needed. We propose to study the use of TC-325 in upper and lower malignant GI bleeding compared to contemporary standard of care, and more specifically seeks funding for a pilot study to inform a subsequent peer-review application for a larger, more definitive randomized clinical trial (RCT).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1A4
        • McGill University Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • able to comprehend the trial and provide written informed consent in French or English, or a close relative with power of attorney
  • Patients who present with an upper or lower GI bleeding with a known luminal GI malignancy diagnosed within the past two years will be considered for enrolment. Endoscopic confirmation of an active GI bleed arising from a malignant tumor will be required for final inclusion
  • Rebleeding in patients who presented with acute GIB with initial endoscopy suggesting a malignant source based on endoscopic appearance who have not been treated previously with TC-325 will also be included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refused by patient
  • Pregnancy
  • Bleeding from non-malignant GI sources such as gastritis/duodenitis, Mallory Weiss syndrome, peptic ulcer disease, varices, vascular malformations, radiation proctitis, polyps, hemorrhoids, and diverticulosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control group
Current standard endoscopic therapy such as epinephrine injection, sclerotherapy, mechanical (endoclip). contact electrocautery/thermal, and non-contact electrocalcautery (APC) ± radiation therapy, angioembolization, and/or surgery.
Other Names:
  • epinephrine injection,
  • sclerotherapy,
  • mechanical (endoclip).
  • contact electrocautery/thermal
  • non-contact electrocalcautery (APC) ± radiation therapy,
  • angioembolization,
  • surgery
Active Comparator: TC-325
TC-325 monotherapy on initial endoscopy ± radiation therapy, angioembolization, and/or surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemostasis
Time Frame: 3 minutes after endoscopic therapy
The main outcome will be rate of immediate hemostasis with application of TC-325 or conventional hemostatic therapy. Immediate hemostasis is defined as the absence of bleeding following 3 minutes of observation after endoscopic therapy.
3 minutes after endoscopic therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rebleeding
Time Frame: 1, 3, 30, 90 and 180 days following randomization
Rebleeding following randomization
1, 3, 30, 90 and 180 days following randomization
Transfusion
Time Frame: 30 days after randomization
transfusion requirements
30 days after randomization
length of ICU admission
Time Frame: 180 days
need for admission to and length of stay in a monitored care unit
180 days
Length of hospitalization
Time Frame: 180 days
Total length of hospitalization
180 days
Complications
Time Frame: day 1
Complications associated with endoscopy
day 1
Additional treatment modalities
Time Frame: 30 days
Rates of use of additional treatment modalities to stop persistent bleeding or rebleeding after the index event
30 days
Mortality
Time Frame: 180 days
180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 22, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on MALIGNANT GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING

Clinical Trials on Current standard therapy

3
Subscribe