Noninvasive Neuromodulation for Treatment of Symptoms Due to Mild or Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury

April 5, 2019 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Cranial Nerve Noninvasive Neuromodulation Using the PoNS for Treatment of Symptoms Due to Mild or Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury

The investigators hypothesis is that electrical stimulation to the tongue that directly stimulates two cranial nerve nuclei (Trigeminal and Facial Nerve Nuclei), will excite neural impulses to the brainstem and cerebellum. The investigators call this cranial nerve non-invasive neuromodulation (CN-NINM). The activation of these structures induces neuroplasticity when combined with specific physical, cognitive and/or mental exercises, promoting recovery of selected functional damage such as problems with balance or walking.

44 subjects will be recruited for 2 weeks of intensive In-Lab Balance and Gait Training followed by 12 weeks of intensive Home Training with weekly In-Lab check sessions. Half of the subjects will use CN-NINM in conjunction with the exercise. Half of the subjects will use very low level stimulation in conjunction with the exercise, and will serve as a control group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • Based on the results of the investigators pilot study in moderate traumatic brain injury (M-TBI), the investigators will conduct a randomized, controlled study of cranial nerve non-invasive neuromodulation (CN-NINM) in individuals with chronic symptoms of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (mTBI), post-concussive sequelae, (PCS) and post-traumatic stress (PTS).
  • The study will involve training of both balance and gait, with assessments using standardized and relevant metrics to monitor changes in these indications, as well as cognitive function, sleep, headache, anxiety, mood, and eye-movement control.
  • The training regimen involves using a neurostimulation intervention that addresses primary and secondary symptoms associated with mTBI, PCS, and PTS.
  • This randomized double blind controlled study will enroll a total of 44 subjects (M & F) in 2 equal subgroups: 22 with an Active PoNS™, and 22 with a Control (non-zero, minimally perceivable stimulation) device.
  • Subjects will participate in a 3-phase intervention beginning with a 2-week in-lab training program (ITP) (2 in-lab training sessions and 1 home training session daily), followed by 12 weeks of training at home (HTP) (3 home training sessions daily), and a 12-week withdrawal period (no training). Subjects will return to the clinic weekly during the at-home phase for a single session of retraining and progression, and participate in periodic retesting.
  • All training and testing will be performed uniformly across all subjects in both groups. Multiple assessment metrics will capture data at the beginning and end of the 2-week in-lab CN-NINM intervention period and at 3-week intervals. After completion of the formal training period, subjects will stop using the device (withdrawal stage) and will be tested every 3 weeks over an additional 12 weeks to monitor and assess changes due to withdrawal of the PoNS. This will yield a total of 10 data points for each subject.
  • If successful, this study would indicate that CN-NINM may improve rehabilitation outcomes and reduce time required to improve function.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53706
        • TCNL, Department of Kinesiology, UW Madison

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All candidates will have a balance disorder as a result of a traumatic brain injury (TBI).
  • All candidates will have a NeuroCom® Sensory Organization Test (SOT) composite score at least 8 points below normal after adjustment for age and height [based on normative data].
  • All candidates will be between the ages of 18 and 65 (at the time of screening).
  • If female of childbearing potential, the candidate agrees to use adequate contraception throughout participation in the study (from enrollment to completion).
  • All candidates must have access to a treadmill.
  • All candidates will be at least 1 year post-injury.
  • All candidates will have a neuroradiologic scan and report after their most recent TBI.
  • All candidates will be ambulatory and able to walk for 20 minutes.
  • All candidates, if on medications, will not have had any major changes in type or dosage within 3 months of enrollment.
  • All candidates will have participated in a focused physical rehabilitation program for their TBI and feel that they have reached a plateau.
  • All candidates will be able to understand and willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All candidates that have oral health problems (e.g. gum disease, active cankers, piercings, oral surgery within the previous 3 months).
  • All candidates with non-removable metal orthodontic devices (e.g., braces) or oral cavity piercings that could interfere with PoNS™ use.
  • All candidates who have chronic infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, HIV, TB).
  • All candidates with unmanaged hypertension.
  • All candidates with unmanaged diabetes, or complications due to diabetes (e.g. retinopathy, neuropathy, renal disease).
  • All candidates with neurological disorders other than those attributed to their primary diagnosis (e.g., MS, PD, ALS, AD or other dementia, uncontrolled pain).
  • All candidates with a history of oral cancer.
  • All candidates who have been treated for any type of cancer other than basal cell carcinoma within the past year.
  • All candidates who have had a penetrating injury, craniotomy (with the exception of a burr hole [trephination] for resolution of acute subdural hematoma), or refractory subdural hematoma.
  • Exceptions for other abnormalities identified in neuroradiologic scan reports that are asymptomatic and not expected to change may be made on a case by case basis by the Medical Advisor.
  • All candidates with chronic use of psychoactive or psychostimulant medications that, in the opinion of the investigators, would compromise the subject's ability to comprehend and perform the study activities.
  • All candidates who have a pacemaker, or are identified as at-risk for cardiovascular events.
  • All candidates who are pregnant or lactating.
  • All candidates with a lower extremity biomechanical prosthetic.
  • All candidates with a history of seizures (except those in the acute or post-acute phases, and are controlled).
  • All candidates who who experienced a loss of consciousness greater than 24 hours as a result of their TBI.
  • All candidates with a "severe" score in any of the Attention, Memory, or Executive Functions categories on the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT).
  • All candidates who, in the opinion of the investigators, are unable to feel the stimulation and successfully complete the device level setting procedure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neurostimulation
Balance and gait training using neurostimulation modulation. 2-week in lab training (ITP), (2 in-lab training sessions and 1 home training session daily) followed by 12 weeks of training at home (HTP) (3 home training sessions daily), and a 12-week withdrawal period (no training).
CN-NINM uses sequenced patterns of electrical stimulation on the tongue. Our hypothesis is that CN-NINM induces neuroplasticity by noninvasive stimulation of two major cranial nerves: trigeminal, CN-V, and facial, CN-VII.
Other Names:
  • Portable Neuromodulation Stimulator (PoNS)
  • Cranial Nerve Non-invasive Neuromodulation (CN-NINM)
Sham Comparator: Minimally perceivable stimulation
Balance and gait training using non-zero, minimally perceivable stimulation (sham device). 2-week in lab training (ITP), (2 in-lab training sessions and 1 home training session daily) followed by 12 weeks of training at home (HTP) (3 home training sessions daily), and a 12-week withdrawal period (no training).
The sham device is visually identical to the CN-NINM device, and offers a non-zero, minimally perceivable stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NeuroCom Computerized Dynamic Posturography Sensory Organization Test (SOT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2, 14, and 26 weeks

SOT assesses the ability to use visual, proprioceptive, and vestibular cues to maintain postural stability. Subjects stand on dual-force plates and the anterior-posterior sway is recorded. 6 conditions are tested (3, 20-sec trials each): Eyes open on firm surface; Eyes closed on firm surface; Eyes open with sway referenced visual surround; Eyes open on sway referenced support surface; Eyes closed on sway referenced support surface; Eyes open on sway referenced support surface and surround.

A composite score is generated by the NeuroCom BalanceMaster System using an algorithm to calculate the composite score from each of the 3 serial repetitions for each of the 6 conditions (a total of 18 sub-scores). The calculated composite score ranges from 0 to 100 points; 0 is complete failure, 100 is perfect stability, 70 is the lower limit normal. Group mean score for each time-point is reported.

Baseline, 2, 14, and 26 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory Over Baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
A 22-item subjective inventory of TBI symptoms where symptoms are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). Lower scores indicate decreased symptoms. Group mean change from baseline at 2, 14, and 26 weeks is reported. The range of possible scores if from 0 to 88. The results are reported as a change from baseline.
Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Change in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Over Baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Measures walking speed over ground. The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance in meters an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. Change in 6MWT over baseline for each time point is reported.
Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Change in Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) Over Baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Assesses walking, walking with head turns, over and around obstacles, and stairs. Dynamic Gait Index - A semiquantitative tool used to evaluate a patient's ability to modify gait by changing task demands, esp. in patients with dizziness and balance deficits. This test is used to identify patients, esp. older adults, who are predisposed to falling. Participants are graded from 0 (low function) to 3 (high function) on 8 tasks: normal walking, their ability to vary walking speed, turn their heads, turn their bodies, step over and around obstacles, climb stairs, turn while walking. The range of scores is 0-24, higher scores indicate higher function, with a score of 24 considered Normal. Change from baseline to 2, 14, and 26 weeks is reported.
Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Change in California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) Over Baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Assesses short- and long-term verbal memory by evaluating a series of recall and recognition tasks. The test is scored via computer algorithm. A score of 50 represents is equal to the population mean, the normal range is between 40-60 (ie. +/- 1 SD from the mean). The total range of possible scores is 0 (no recalled words) to 100 (all correct). Change in score over baseline at 2, 14, and 26 weeks is reported.
Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Change in Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI 18) Over Baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
A short, reliable, 18-question instrument for assessment of psychological distress (anxiety, depression, & somatization) in a clinical population. It is scored from 0-4, with a total range of possible scores 0-72 where higher scores indicate more distress.
Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Change in Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Symbol Search and Coding (WAIS-IV) Over Baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Assesses visual spatial abilities. The Symbol Search and Coding WAIS-IV subtests measure Processing Speed, an indicator of the rate of cognitive processing and creating an appropriate response output. The tasks require attending to visual material, visual scanning and perception, spatial organization, hand-eye coordination, and paired associative learning. The raw score (processing speed for each test) is converted to a scaled score 1-10 for each and summed for a total possible score of 2-20, the higher the score, the more improved the processing speed. Change in score from baseline to 2, 14, and 26 weeks are reported.
Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Subjective inventory of sleep habits, duration and quality. It is scored from 7 components (sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction) to provide a global PSQI score. Most items are scored from 0-3 where 3 is a negative extreme, therefore lower cumulative scores are indicative of improved sleep habits. The total range of scores is from 0-21.
Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Change in Headache Disability Index (HDI) From Baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Assesses frequency & severity of headaches via a 25-item questionnaire where an answer of 'yes' = 4 points, 'sometimes' = 2 points, and 'no' = 0 points. The lower the score, the less frequent and severe the symptoms. The range of possible scores is 0 to 100. The results are reported as a change from baseline.
Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Electromyography (EMG)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Measures muscle activation patterns during gait.
Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Computerized Video Nystagmography (VNG)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks
Measures eye movement control under 3 static (x and y axis fixation, spontaneous nystagmus), and 3 dynamic conditions (random saccade, smooth pursuit, optokinetic nystagmus).
Change from Baseline at 2,14, and 26 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mitchell E Tyler, MS, TCNL, Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification will be available to researchers for independent verification of study outcomes or to conduct subsequent clinical research, whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months after publication of primary outcomes, and ending 5 years after that date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Proposals should be directed to metyler1@wisc.edu. If approved after review by regulatory counsel, requestors will enter into a formal data sharing agreement. Data will be shared via encrypted single-user file transmission protocol.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries, Traumatic

Clinical Trials on Balance and Gait Training using neurostimulation modulation.

3
Subscribe