- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02182843
Cellentra Viable Cell Bone Matrix (VCBM) Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Outcomes Study (VCBM/MaxAn) (VCBM/ACDF)
March 14, 2019 updated by: Zimmer Biomet
The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who undergo ACDF procedures using Cellentra Viable Cell Bone Matrix (VCBM), cortical allograft spacers, and the MaxAn® Anterior Cervical Plate System.
Cellentra VCBM will be compared to published data for autograft in NDI (Neck Disability Index) improvement and radiographic success of fusion.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective single-arm multi-center study of Cellentra Viable Cell Bone Matrix (VCBM) and the MaxAn® Anterior Cervical Plate System when used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures.
This study will enroll up to eighty (80) subjects across up to eight (8) clinical sites.
Subjects will be recruited from a pool of patients presenting to investigators for an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedure.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
81
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85013
- Barrow Neurological Associates
-
-
Indiana
-
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46804
- Fort Wayne Ortho
-
-
Kentucky
-
Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42001
- Orthopaedic Institute of Western KY
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43203
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
- The Rothman Institute
-
-
Texas
-
Southlake, Texas, United States, 75032
- Spine Team Texas
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The subject is scheduled to undergo a two or three level primary spinal fusion surgery between the levels of C2-T1 (Cervical 2 to Thoracic 1) using Cellentra™ VCBM, allograft spacers, and the MaxAn® Anterior Cervical Plate System.
- The subject is 18 years of age or older.
- The subject was unresponsive to conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks unless clinically indicated sooner.
- The subject has persistent neck, shoulder, or arm pain consistent with cervical degenerative disc disease confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies.
- The subject must in the investigator's opinion, be psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to fully comply with this protocol including the required follow-up visits, the filling out of required forms, and have the ability to understand and give written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has an active local or systemic infection.
- Subject is morbidly obese, defined as a BMI greater than 40.
- Subject has a history (present or past) of substance abuse (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that in the investigator's opinion may interfere with protocol assessments and/or with the subject's ability to complete the protocol required follow-up.
- Subject has inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site.
- Subject has an open wound local to the operative area, or rapid joint disease, bone absorption, osteopenia, osteomalacia and/or osteoporosis.
- Any previous cervical spinal surgery.
- Subject has a condition requiring medications that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing (i.e., oral or parenteral glucocorticoids, immunosuppressives, methotrexate, etc.) or immunocompromised.
- Subject has any medical condition or extenuating circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study.
- Subject who does not meet the specific indications for use of the Cellentra™ VCBM or MaxAn® Anterior Cervical Plate System.
- Subject is pregnant, lactating or interested in becoming pregnant during the duration of the study.
- Subject is currently involved in another investigational drug or device study that could confound study data.
- Subject is a prisoner.
- Subject has a metal sensitivity/foreign body sensitivity.
- Subject is involved in or planning to engage in litigation or receiving Worker's Compensation related to neck or back pain.
- Subject has sensitivity or allergies to any of the processing agents. (See package insert for Cellentra™ VCBM).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Cellentra VCBM
Cellentra™ VCBM is an allogenic bone graft containing naturally occurring viable donor cells intended for homologous use in the repair, replacement, reconstruction or supplementation of the recipient's tissue in musculoskeletal defects.
|
Cellentra™ VCBM is an allogenic bone graft containing naturally occurring viable donor cells intended for homologous use in the repair, replacement, reconstruction or supplementation of the recipient's tissue in musculoskeletal defects.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in NDI From Baseline
Time Frame: 12 months after device implantation
|
Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation.
Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5, with a maximum score of 50.
The obtained score is multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score.
A higher score indicates more patient-rated disability (0 points or 0% means : no activity limitations , 50 points or 100% means complete activity limitation).
The minimal clinically important difference or change (MCID / MCIC) is described as the smallest difference or change that patients perceive as beneficial.
In patients with cervical radiculopathy the MCID is 7 points of change ( 14%).
In order to demonstrate improvement in status, the NDI would need to be reduced by at least 14%.
|
12 months after device implantation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants With Radiographic Success at 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 Months
|
Radiographic fusion was assessed at each operated level using the Bridwell fusion grading system:
Radiographic success was defined as grade 1 or 2 fusion at every operated level at 24 months |
24 Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Joel Batts, Biomet Spine
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Mar;6(3):198-209. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198.
- Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, Lee GP, Robinson JS Jr. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2310-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e.
- Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Hoffman GA, Bae HW, Gaede SE, Rashbaum RF, Nunley PD, Peterson DL, Stokes JK. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):532-45. doi: 10.3171/2013.6.SPINE12527. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
- Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, Baldus C, Blanke K. Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jun 15;20(12):1410-8.
- Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. A review of one hundred forty-six patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Oct;9(7):667-71. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198410000-00002.
- Palit M, Schofferman J, Goldthwaite N, Reynolds J, Kerner M, Keaney D, Lawrence-Miyasaki L. Anterior discectomy and fusion for the management of neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Nov 1;24(21):2224-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199911010-00009.
- McConnell JR, Freeman BJ, Debnath UK, Grevitt MP, Prince HG, Webb JK. A prospective randomized comparison of coralline hydroxyapatite with autograft in cervical interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Feb 15;28(4):317-23. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048503.51956.E1.
- Samartzis D, Shen FH, Goldberg EJ, An HS. Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 1;30(15):1756-61. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000172148.86756.ce.
- Soderlund CH, Pointillart V, Pedram M, Andrault G, Vital JM. Radiolucent cage for cervical vertebral reconstruction: a prospective study of 17 cases with 2-year minimum follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2004 Dec;13(8):685-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0747-8. Epub 2004 Jun 26.
- Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
- Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs JD. Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J. 2009 Oct;9(10):802-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
- Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody CN, Gordon CR, Lauryssen C, Ohnmeiss DD, Boltes MO. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Oct;15(4):348-58. doi: 10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10769. Epub 2011 Jun 24. Erratum In: J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Mar;16(3):322.
- Lofgren H, Engquist M, Hoffmann P, Sigstedt B, Vavruch L. Clinical and radiological evaluation of Trabecular Metal and the Smith-Robinson technique in anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2010 Mar;19(3):464-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1161-z. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
- Miller LE, Block JE. Safety and effectiveness of bone allografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2045-50. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff37eb.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 2, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
July 8, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 15, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 14, 2019
Last Verified
February 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CS-092
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cervical Disc Degenerative Disorder
-
NuVasiveActive, not recruitingCervical Degenerative Disc DisorderUnited States
-
NuVasiveCompletedCervical Degenerative Disc DisorderUnited States
-
NuVasiveCompletedCervical Degenerative Disc DisorderUnited States
-
Spinal KineticsRecruitingCervical Disc Degenerative DisorderUnited States
-
Medtronic Spinal and BiologicsCompletedDegenerative Cervical Disc DiseaseSaudi Arabia, Greece, Serbia, Hungary, Czech Republic, Kuwait, Poland, Slovakia
-
NuVasiveCompletedCervical Disc Degenerative DisorderUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
DePuy InternationalTerminatedCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseAustralia, Germany, Italy, Malaysia, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Synergy Spine SolutionsMCRANot yet recruitingCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
Medtronic Spinal and BiologicsCompletedCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States