Cold Knife Conization With and Without Lateral Hemostatic Sutures

July 5, 2014 updated by: Ricardo dos Reis, Barretos Cancer Hospital

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Cold Knife Conization of the Cervix With and Without Lateral Hemostatic Sutures

The treatment of high grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 2, 3 is defined according to the colposcopic evaluation of the patient. In case colposcopy findings are satisfactory (visible squamocolumnar junction), both ablative and excisional methods are adequate. In the middle of the 20th century, lateral hemostatic sutures were added to the cold knife conization surgical technique to reduce blood loss. Some authors recommend that these branches should be ligated, but it remains unclear whether these sutures are actually effective in reducing bleeding.This study compared blood loss during cold knife conization of the cervix with and without lateral hemostatic sutures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a study that will evaluate two groups of patients undergoing cold-knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia high grade where 50% will undergo hemostatic sutures in the lateral cervical and 50% of patients will not be subjected to these sutures. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the amount of intraoperative bleeding.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • RS
      • Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
        • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 78 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • indication of cold knife conization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • conization using techniques other than the cold knife;
  • previous cervical conization using any other technique;
  • previous pelvic radiotherapy;
  • pregnancy; and
  • refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stitches
Cold Knife Conization with stitches
In the research arm patients who underwent cold-knife conization of the cervix underwent hemostatic sutures laterally to the cervix, at localization of 3 and 9 hours with 2-0 vicryl thread. These sutures were held prior to the onset of cold conization of the cervix.
Other Names:
  • Cold Knife conization with sutures
  • Cervix hemostatic sutures
Active Comparator: No stitches
Cold Knife Conization without stitches
In the research arm patients who underwent cold-knife conization of the cervix have not undergone hemostatic sutures laterally to the cervix, at localization of 3 and 9 hours with 2-0 vicryl thread. After patient anesthesia and routine antisepsis was performed, cold knife conization of the cervix was performed.
Other Names:
  • Cervix conization without hemostatic sutures
  • Cold knife conization without lateral sutures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperatory vaginal bleeding
Time Frame: Intraoperatory
The intraoperatory bleeding will be measure by weigh the gauze in grams (g).
Intraoperatory

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ricardo D Reis, MD, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre-Brazil

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 9, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Clinical Trials on Cold Knife Conization with stitches

3
Subscribe