Wood Smoke Interventions in Native American Populations (EldersAIR)

November 2, 2022 updated by: Curtis Noonan, University of Montana

Residential Wood Smoke Interventions Improving Health in Native American Populations

A critical need exists for efficient community-based interventions aimed at reduction of environmental exposures relevant to health. Biomass smoke exposures due to residential wood heating are common among rural Native American communities, and such exposures have been associated with respiratory disease in susceptible populations. In many of these communities wood stoves are the most economic and traditionally preferred method of residential heating, but resource scarcity can result in burning of improper wood fuels and corresponding high levels of indoor particulate matter. Community-based participatory research techniques will be used to adapt intervention approaches to meet the cultural context of each participating community. At the community level, investigators will facilitate local development of a tribal agency-led wood bank program ensuring that elderly and/or persons with need have access to dry wood for heating. At the household level, investigators will use a three arm randomized placebo-controlled intervention trial to implement and assess education/outreach on best burn practices (Tx1). The content and delivery strategies of the education intervention will be adapted to each community according to stakeholder input. This educational intervention will be evaluated against an indoor air filtration unit arm (Tx2), as well as a placebo arm (Tx3, sham air filters). Tx3 will be used in comparison with the other two treatment arms to evaluate the penetration and efficacy of the community-level wood bank program. Outcomes will be evaluated with respect to changes in pulmonary function measures and respiratory symptoms and conditions among household elders. The investigators hypothesize that locally-designed education-based interventions at the community and household levels will result in efficacious and sustainable strategies for reducing personal exposures to indoor particulate matter, and lead to respiratory health improvements in elderly Native populations. This study will advance knowledge of cost-effective environmental interventions within two unique Native American communities, and inform sustainable multi-level strategies in similar communities throughout the US to improve respiratory health among at-risk populations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rural Native American (NA) communities experience disproportionate disease burden compared to other US populations, with poor indoor air quality resulting from in-home biomass smoke exposures (residential wood stoves) a likely contributor to these health burden discrepancies. Epidemiological studies support the etiological association between indoor biomass smoke exposure and several domains of global disease burden, particularly with respect to pediatric respiratory tract infections and adult chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic bronchitis. Elderly populations are particularly susceptible to chronic respiratory conditions, and declining pulmonary function is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Randomized trials in developing countries have demonstrated the impact that improved cookstove technologies have in reducing biomass smoke exposures and children's risk of acute respiratory infection. However limited knowledge is available regarding the potential improvements in NA elderly populations following wood stove interventions.

Today, a critical need exists for efficient community-based interventions aimed at promoting healthy indoor environments in at-risk communities. Financial and logistical barriers that currently exist in rural and economically disadvantaged NA communities prohibit the implementation and sustainability of many environmental health interventions. Regarding wood stoves, qualitative input from experts and Native communities underscores the need for innovative low-cost, sustainable interventions targeting the reduction of in-home biomass smoke exposures. In this proposal, investigators will test community-level and education-based household-level strategies aimed at promoting and implementing best-burn practices to improve air quality and respiratory health in at-risk elderly populations.

This proposal represents a multidisciplinary collaboration between university and tribal stakeholders from two Native American Reservations to develop, adapt, implement, and evaluate a two-level intervention to reduce exposure to indoor biomass smoke and improve respiratory health among elderly tribal members. Community-based participatory research techniques will be used to adapt intervention approaches to meet the cultural context of each participating community. At the community level, investigators will facilitate local development of tribal agency-led wood yard and distribution programs ensuring that elderly and/or persons with need have access to dry wood for heating. With community advisory guidance, investigators will use a three arm randomized placebo-controlled intervention trial to implement and assess education on best burn practices (Tx1) at the household level. This educational intervention will be evaluated against an indoor air filtration unit arm (Tx2), as well as a placebo arm (Tx3, sham air filters). Tx3 will be used in comparison with the other two treatment arms to evaluate the penetration and efficacy of the community-level fuel program. Outcomes will be evaluated with respect to changes in markers of respiratory health among elders and changes in indoor air quality (PM2.5). The investigators hypothesize that locally-designed education-based interventions, in the context of a community-based strategy focused on wood fuels, will result in efficacious and sustainable strategies for reducing personal exposures to indoor biomass smoke PM2.5 and lead to respiratory health improvements in elderly NA populations.

Specific Aims are as follows:

Aim 1. Facilitate the tribally-centered development, adaption, implementation, and evaluation of community-level wood yard and distribution programs for participating tribal households.

Aim 2. Facilitate the development, adaptation, implementation, and evaluation of household-level education strategies targeting best-burn practices (Tx1) for each participating tribal community.

Aim 3. Compare effectiveness, both within and between communities, of household-level interventions among elderly adults participating in a three-arm randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Aim 3a. Compare group changes in pulmonary function and respiratory symptoms and infections.

Aim 3b. Compare group changes in indoor and personal PM2.5 exposures.

Aim 4. Evaluate penetration, acceptance, and sustainability of community- and household-level strategies using both qualitative and quantitative data generated in collaboration with tribal community advisory boards and research participants.

Impact. The long-term goal of this project will be to reduce mortality and morbidity in NA communities from exposures related to residential home heating. This study will advance knowledge of effective interventions within two unique NA Reservations and describe improvements in sub-clinical indicators of pulmonary health in susceptible elderly populations. Reducing in-home wood smoke exposures through community level facilitation of access to proper fuels and introduction of sustainable, culturally appropriate best-burn practices will inform strategies for translation to other NA communities or similar rural and underserved populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

149

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Montana
      • Missoula, Montana, United States, 59812
        • University of Montana

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Tribal member from one of the two study regions
  • Age 55 years or older.
  • Utilize a wood stove as the primary heating source.
  • Capable and willing to record symptom data and wood stove usage data, as well as complete pulmonary function testing (i.e., spirometry).

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Education (Tx1)
Education on best burn practices
Education on best burn practices
Active Comparator: Air Filtration Unit Treatment (Tx2)
A 20" x 18" Filtrete air filtration unit (3M, St. Paul, MN) will be placed in the same room as the wood stove.
A 20" x 18" Filtrete air filtration unit (3M, St. Paul, MN) will be placed in the same room as the wood stove
Sham Comparator: Placebo Intervention (Tx3)
A 20" x 18" Filtrete air filtration unit will be installed within the wood stove home. Instead of a high efficiency filter, the units will utilize a placebo filter.
A 20" x 18" Filtrete air filtration unit will be installed within the wood stove home. Instead of a high efficiency filter, the units will utilize a placebo filter.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-intervention FEV1
Time Frame: Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Health measures were collected at two visits during both winter periods with each visit separated by at least three weeks.
Mean of up to two post-intervention measures of forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1), liters
Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Health measures were collected at two visits during both winter periods with each visit separated by at least three weeks.
Post-intervention FVC
Time Frame: Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Health measures were collected at two visits during both winter periods with each visit separated by at least three weeks.
Mean of up to two post-intervention measures of forced vital capacity (FVC), liters
Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Health measures were collected at two visits during both winter periods with each visit separated by at least three weeks.
Post-intervention FEV1/FVC Ratio
Time Frame: Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Health measures were collected at two visits during both winter periods with each visit separated by at least three weeks.
Mean of up to two post-intervention measures of forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) / forced vital capacity (FVC)
Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Health measures were collected at two visits during both winter periods with each visit separated by at least three weeks.
Post-intervention Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Health measures were collected at two visits during both winter periods with each visit separated by at least three weeks.
Mean of up to two post-intervention measures of systolic blood pressure, millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Health measures were collected at two visits during both winter periods with each visit separated by at least three weeks.
Post-intervention Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Health measures were collected at two visits during both winter periods with each visit separated by at least three weeks.
Mean of up to two post-intervention measures of diastolic blood pressure, millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Health measures were collected at two visits during both winter periods with each visit separated by at least three weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-intervention Indoor Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)
Time Frame: Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Indoor 48-hour PM2.5 average concentration was measured at two post-intervention visits separated by at least three weeks.
Post-intervention average Indoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentration
Each participant was followed during a pre-intervention baseline (Winter 1) and a post-intervention follow-up period (Winter 2). Indoor 48-hour PM2.5 average concentration was measured at two post-intervention visits separated by at least three weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Curtis W Noonan, Ph.D., University of Montana
  • Principal Investigator: Tony J Ward, Ph.D., University of Montana
  • Principal Investigator: Annie Belcourt, Ph.D., University of Montana

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB 218-12
  • R01ES022583 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Infection Other

Clinical Trials on Education (Tx1)

3
Subscribe