Alcon® Ex-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device in Japanese Patients

July 12, 2018 updated by: Alcon Research

Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of the EX-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the Alcon Ex-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device (Ex-PRESS) in Japanese subjects with normal tension glaucoma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokyo, Japan, 107-0052
        • Contact Alcon Japan, Ltd for Trial Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of normal tension glaucoma.
  • Indicated for filtration surgery using Ex-PRESS®.
  • Understand and provide Informed Consent.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to be pregnant during the study period.
  • Diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma or secondary glaucoma.
  • History of glaucoma surgery.
  • Ophthalmologic surgery within the past 6 months.
  • Difficulty with applanation tonometry measurement.
  • Corneal dystrophy.
  • Infectious/non-infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, or uveitis in either eye.
  • Severe blepharitis or dry eye.
  • History of metal allergy.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ex-PRESS
Ex-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device, Model P50PL, implanted in the anterior chamber of the study eye during glaucoma surgery intended for the lifetime of the patient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Time Frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Change From Baseline in IOP
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Percent Change From Baseline in IOP
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Percentage of Eyes With IOP Lowering Rate of 20% or More From Baseline up to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Percentage of Eyes Receiving Drug Therapy for Glaucoma Necessary to Maintain the IOP
Time Frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). For some subjects, both left and right eyes were targeted for the study, and data from both eyes were analyzed for this safety endpoint, as specified in the protocol.
Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Percentage of Eyes Receiving Secondary Surgical Treatment (Including Laser Therapy) Necessary to Maintain the IOP
Time Frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Secondary surgical treatment included needling, laser suture lysis, and conjunctival and scleral flap sutures. For some subjects, both left and right eyes were targeted for the study, and data from both eyes were analyzed for this safety endpoint, as specified in the protocol. An eye may have received more than one procedure.
Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alcon, A Novartis Division, Alcon Japan, Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 26, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 24, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 24, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ALJ-P2013-1
  • UMIN000013243 (Registry Identifier: UMIN)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Ex-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device, Model P50PL

3
Subscribe