Lymphedema Study for Arm or Leg Lymphedema

October 25, 2022 updated by: Stanley Rockson, Stanford University

Placebo-controlled, Case-controlled, Open Label Therapeutic Trial for Unilateral or Bilateral Lymphedema of Arm or Leg.

This study compares the effectiveness of a study drug versus placebo in the treatment of lymphedema.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Part 1 is feasibility, exploratory, open-label study of ketoprofen, to document effects.

Part 2, is open-label trial of ketoprofen to document histological response. Part 3 is double-blind randomized trial of receive placebo or ketoprofen to evaluate safety and efficacy.

We will try to determine how the study drug affects the body tissue by obtaining tissue biopsies (small pieces of skin from the arm or leg) before treatment and after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

117

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 88 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a history of lymphedema of one or more limbs (unilateral or bilateral), with a duration of > 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active cancer, infection or bleeding tendency will be excluded.
  • We will also exclude patients with medical contraindications to NSAIDs, including history of allergies, know gastrointestinal intolerance, or other serious systemic illness (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, congestive heart failure, neurological or psychological impairment) that would impair the patients' ability to participate.
  • Minors (<18 years of age) *>90 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Part 1: Exploratory Group

Ketoprofen 225-300 mgs daily, taken orally

Ketoprofen-exploratory group: 225-300 mgs daily for four to six months

Experimental: Part 2: Open-label Group

Ketoprofen 225 mg daily, taken orally

Open-label group: 75 mgs, three times daily, for four months

Placebo Comparator: Part 3: Placebo Group

Participants randomized to receive placebo: placebo, three times daily, taken orally

Placebo: 1 capsule, three times daily, for four months

Placebo to match ketoprofen.
Active Comparator: Part 3: Ketoprofen Group

Participants randomized to receive active medication: ketoprofen 75 mgs., three times daily, taken orally

Ketoprofen: 1 capsule, three times daily, for four months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part 1: Count of Participants Able to Complete Ketoprofen Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to month 6
Participants who were able to complete ketoprofen treatment and experienced no treatment-related serious adverse events.
Baseline to month 6
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Histological Architecture
Time Frame: Baseline; Month 4
Quantitative assessment of paired histological specimens of lymphedema skin pre- and post-treatment with ketoprofen. The impact of treatment on cutaneous histopathology was evaluated through the use of an empirically-derived scoring system (comprised of dermal thickness, intercellular mucin content, deep dermal collagen content, and perivascular infiltrate); this quantitative assessment was developed and performed by a dermatopathologist. Each characteristic was weighted equally and each specimen was assigned a cumulative subscale score of 0-5. The scores were summed for a total score (range: 0-20) which is presented here. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of pathology. A quantitatively higher negative change indicates a more favorable therapeutic response in the histology.
Baseline; Month 4
Part 3: Measurement of Skin Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months
Caliper-measured skin thickness (mm) was serially assessed and pre-to-post paired analysis was performed for both arms (Placebo and Ketoprofen) of the study.
Baseline and 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part 2: Measurement of Skin Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months
Caliper measured skin thickness (mm) of lymphedema-affected limb was serially assessed and pre-to-post paired analysis was performed.
Baseline and 4 months
Part 3: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Histological Architecture
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 months
Quantitative assessment of paired histological specimens of lymphedema skin pre- and post-treatment with ketoprofen or placebo, respectively. The impact of treatment on cutaneous histopathology was evaluated through the use of an empirically-derived scoring system (comprised of dermal thickness, intercellular mucin content, deep dermal collagen content, and perivascular infiltrate); this quantitative assessment was developed and performed by a dermatopathologist. Each characteristic was weighted equally and each specimen was assigned a cumulative subscale score of 0-5. The scores were summed for a total score (range: 0-20) which is presented here. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of pathology. For the analysis, the 4-month post-minus-pre change in this score for ketoprofen- and placebo-recipients, respectively, was compared. A quantitatively higher negative change indicates a more favorable therapeutic response in the histology.
Baseline; 4 months
Part 2/Part 3: Change From Baseline in Bioimpedance Spectroscopy
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 months
A four-electrode configuration was used to non-invasively assess the extracellular and intracellular fluid contents of the limb. Data were analyzed according to Cole theory, using the manufacturer's software (Impedimed Ltd.), to provide values for a bioimpedance ratio (Ro), the resistance of the extracellular fluid including lymph, R∞ the resistance of total tissue fluid and Ri, the resistance of the intracellular fluid. For the purposes of these investigations, in patients with unilateral lymphedema, the ratio of Ro in the affected:unaffected limbs was analyzed in each patient, as a measure of the bioimpedance attributable to the extracellular fluid content. An Ro level of 1.034 was considered normal; values ≥1.034 were considered abnormal.
Baseline; 4 months
Part 2/Part 3: Change in Limb Volume
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 months
Quantitative assessment of limb volume (ml) of the affected limb at study end compared to pre-treatment values.
Baseline; 4 months
Part 3: Change in Systemic Inflammatory Mediator Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 months
The systemic inflammatory response of G-CSF, in the two treatment groups, Ketoprofen and Placebo, will be assessed with Luminex-bead inflammasome analysis of pre- and post-treatment plasma samples. G-CSF, a glycoprotein, is an inflammatory cytokine produced by endothelium and immune cells. Ketoprofen is a unique NSAID possessing dual pathways of inflammatory inhibition, blocking cyclooxygenase (COX) and 5-LO. Measurement using median fluorescence intensity (MFI) was employed.
Baseline; 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stanley G Rockson, MD, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphedema

Clinical Trials on Ketoprofen

3
Subscribe