Rapid Assessment of Potential Ischaemic Heart Disease With CTCA (RAPID-CTCA)

March 25, 2024 updated by: University of Edinburgh

The Role of Early CT Coronary Angiography in the Evaluation, Intervention and Outcome of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Suspected or Confirmed Acute Coronary Syndrome.

This study aims to investigate the effect of early CTCA in patients with suspected or confirmed Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) or Medical Assessment Unit (MAU), upon interventions, event rates and health care costs in a pragmatic clinical trial and economic evaluation up to 1 year after the trial intervention. The primary objective will be to investigate the effect of the intervention on all-cause death or subsequent type 1 or type 4b MI at one year, measured as time to first such event.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

DESIGN: Open parallel group randomised controlled trial of early computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients presenting with suspected/confirmed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to Emergency Departments (ED) and Medical Assessment Units.

SETTING: 37 EDs, radiology, cardiology and acute medical services in tertiary/district general National Health Service (NHS) hospitals.

TARGET POPULATION: Inclusion Criteria: Patient ≥18 years with symptoms mandating investigation for suspected or confirmed ACS with at least one of: ECG abnormalities e.g. ST segment depression >0.5 mm; History of ischaemic heart disease (where the clinician assessing patient confirms history based on patient history or available records); Troponin elevation above the 99th centile of the normal reference range or increase in high sensitivity troponin meeting European Society of Cardiology criteria for 'rule-in' or myocardial infarction (NB troponin assays will vary from site to site; local laboratory reference standards will be used). Exclusion Criteria: 1.Signs, symptoms, or investigations supporting high-risk ACS: ST elevation MI; ACS with signs or symptoms of acute heart failure or circulatory shock; Crescendo episodes of typical anginal pain; Marked or dynamic ECG changes e.g. ST depression of >3 mm; Clinical team have scheduled early invasive coronary angiography on day of trial eligibility assessment. 2. Patient inability to undergo CT: Severe renal failure (serum creatinine >250 µmol/L or estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min); Contrast allergy; Beta blocker intolerance (if no alternative heart rate limiting agent available/suitable) or allergy; Inability to breath hold; Atrial fibrillation (where mean heart rate is anticipated to be greater than 75 beats per minute after beta blockade). 3. Patient has had invasive coronary angiography or CTCA within last 2 years and the previous investigation revealed obstructive coronary artery disease, or patient had either investigation within the last 5 years and the result was normal. 4.Previous recruitment to the trial; 5.Known pregnancy or currently breast feeding; 6. Inability to consent; 7.Further investigation for ACS would not in the patient's interest, due to limited life expectancy, quality of life or functional status; 8.Prisoners

HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES BEING ASSESSED: Early use of ≥64-slice CTCA as part of routine assessment compared to standard care.

MEASUREMENT OF COSTS/OUTCOMES: Primary end-point will be one-year all-cause death or subsequent type 1 or type 4b MI at one year, measured as time to first such event. Secondary endpoints: Key Secondary Endpoints : 1. Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) death or subsequent non-fatal MI; 2. Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) death or subsequent non-fatal MI; 3. Subsequent non-fatal MI; 4.Coronary Heart Disease death; 5. Cardiovascular death; 6. All-cause death. Other Endpoints; Coronary

Heart Disease (CHD) death or subsequent non-fatal MI (type 1 or 4b);Subsequent Non-fatal MI (type 1 or 4b); Non-cardiovascular death; Invasive coronary angiography; Coronary revascularisation; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery bypass graft; Proportion of patients prescribed ACS therapies during index hospitalisation; Proportion of patients discharged on preventative treatment or have alteration in dosage of preventative treatment during index hospitalisation; Length of stay for index hospitalisation; Representation or rehospitalisation with suspected ACS/recurrent chest pain within 12 months after index hospitalisation; Chest pain symptoms up to 12 months; Patient satisfaction at 1 month; Clinician certainty of presenting diagnosis after CTCA; Quality of Life (measured by EQ- 5D-5L up to12 months). Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events; Proportion of patients with alternative cardiovascular diagnoses identified on CTCA; Proportion of patients with non-cardiovascular diagnosis identified on CTCA; Radiation exposure from CTCA as trial intervention. Cost effectiveness:

Estimated in terms of the lifetime incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

SAMPLE SIZE: 1,749 patients (1,748 available for analysis).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1749

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • St Helier, Jersey
        • Jersey General Hospital
      • Basildon, United Kingdom
        • Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • Belfast, United Kingdom
        • Ulster Hospital
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom
        • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
      • Bournemouth, United Kingdom
        • The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospital
      • Bradford, United Kingdom
        • Bradford Royal Infirmary
      • Dudley, United Kingdom
        • Russells Hall Hospital
      • Dundee, United Kingdom
        • Ninewells Hospital
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA
        • Royal Infirmary Edinburgh
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
        • Glasgow Royal Infirmary
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
        • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
      • Inverness, United Kingdom
        • Raigmore Hospital
      • Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom
        • Victoria Hospital
      • Leeds, United Kingdom
        • Leeds General Infirmary
      • Lewisham, United Kingdom
        • University Hospital Lewisham
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Royal London Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • St. Thomas' Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • University Hospital North Tees
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Whipps Cross Hospital
      • Luton, United Kingdom
        • Luton & Dunstable Hospital
      • Melrose, United Kingdom
        • Borders General Hospital
      • Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
        • Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
      • Newcastle, United Kingdom
        • Royal Victoria Infirmary
      • Plymouth, United Kingdom
        • Derriford Hospital
      • Portsmouth, United Kingdom
        • Queen Alexandra Hospital
      • Reading, United Kingdom
        • Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
      • Redhill, United Kingdom
        • East Surrey Hospital
      • Rotherham, United Kingdom
        • Rotherham Hospital
      • Sandwell, United Kingdom
        • Sandwell General Hospital
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom
        • Northern General Hospital
      • Southampton, United Kingdom
        • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
      • Stoke, United Kingdom
        • University Hospitals of the Midlands
      • Torquay, United Kingdom
        • Torbay Hospital
      • Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
        • New Cross Hospital
      • Worcester, United Kingdom
        • Worcestershire Royal Hospital
      • Wrexham, United Kingdom
        • Wrexham Maelor Hospital
      • Wythenshawe, United Kingdom
        • University Hospital South Manchester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Patient ≥18 years with symptoms mandating investigation for suspected or confirmed ACS with at least one of:

  • ECG abnormalities e.g. ST segment depression >0.5 mm;
  • History of ischaemic heart disease (where the clinician assessing patient confirms history based on patient history or available records);
  • Troponin elevation above the 99th centile of the normal reference range or increase in high sensitivity troponin meeting European Society of Cardiology criteria for 'rule-in' or myocardial infarction (NB troponin assays will vary from site to site; local laboratory reference standards will be used).

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Signs, symptoms, or investigations supporting high-risk ACS:

    • ST elevation MI;
    • ACS with signs or symptoms of acute heart failure or circulatory shock;
    • Crescendo episodes of typical anginal pain;
    • Marked or dynamic ECG changes e.g. ST depression of >3 mm
    • Clinical team have scheduled early invasive coronary angiography on day of trial eligibility assessment.
  • Patient inability to undergo CT:

    • Severe renal failure (serum creatinine >250 µmol/L or estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min);
    • Contrast allergy;
    • Beta blocker intolerance (if no alternative heart rate limiting agent available/suitable) or allergy ;
    • Inability to breath hold;
    • Atrial fibrillation (where mean heart rate is anticipated to be greater than 75 beats per minute after beta blockade).
  • Patient has had invasive coronary angiography or CTCA within last 2 years and the previous investigation revealed obstructive coronary artery disease, or patient had either investigation within the last 5 years and the result was normal.
  • Previous recruitment to the trial;
  • Known pregnancy or currently breast feeding;
  • Inability to consent;
  • Further investigation for ACS would not in the patient's interest, due to limited life expectancy, quality of life or functional status;
  • Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CT Coronary Angiogram
CT Coronary Angiogram plus standard care
Completion of a CT Coronary Angiogram
No Intervention: Standard Care
Standard care only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause Death or Subsequent Non-fatal Type 1 or Type 4b MI at One Year Measured as Time to First Such Event.
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants categorised as having primary outcome event - all-cause death or subsequent non-fatal myocardial infarction (type 1 or 4b) at one year (post randomisation), measured as time to first such event. Myocardial infarction 'type' was defined according to the most recent Universal Definition (1). and was adjudicated independently by two cardiologists blinded to the intervention and the categorisation added to the study database.
1 year (post randomisation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coronary Heart Disease Death or Subsequent Non-fatal MI
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants with coronary heart disease death or subsequent non-fatal myocardial infarction, one year after randomisation.
1 year (post randomisation)
Cardiovascular Disease Death or Subsequent Non-fatal MI
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants categorised as having cardiovascular disease death or subsequent non-fatal myocardial infarction, one year after randomisation
1 year (post randomisation)
Subsequent Non-fatal MI
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants with subsequent non-fatal myocardial infarction, at one year post-randomisation.
1 year (post randomisation)
Coronary Heart Disease Death
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants with Coronary Heart Disease deaths, one year after randomisation
1 year (post randomisation)
Cardiovascular Death
Time Frame: 1 year (post-randomisation)
Number of participants with cardiovascular death, one year after randomisation
1 year (post-randomisation)
All-cause Death
Time Frame: 1 year (post-randomisation)
Number of participants with "all-cause" death, one year post-randomisation
1 year (post-randomisation)
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Death or Subsequent Non-fatal MI (Type 1 or 4b)
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants with Coronary heart disease death or subsequent non-fatal myocardial infarction (type 1 or 4b), one year after randomisation
1 year (post randomisation)
Subsequent Non-fatal MI (Type 1 or 4b)
Time Frame: 1 year (post-randomisation)
Number of participants with subsequent non-fatal myocardial infarction (type 1 or 4b), one year post randomisation
1 year (post-randomisation)
Non-cardiovascular Death
Time Frame: 1 year (post-randomisation)
Number of participants with non-cardiovascular deaths, one year post-randomisation
1 year (post-randomisation)
Invasive Coronary Angiography
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants with Invasive coronary angiography procedures, one year post-randomisation
1 year (post randomisation)
Coronary Revascularisation
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants with Coronary revascularisation by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, one year post randomisation
1 year (post randomisation)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants with percutaneous coronary interventions, 1 year (post randomisation)
1 year (post randomisation)
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants with coronary artery bypass graft procedures, 1 year post randomisation
1 year (post randomisation)
Number of Patients Prescribed ACS Therapies During Index Hospitalisation
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants prescribed acute coronary syndrome therapies during index hospitalisation, 1 year (post randomisation)
1 year (post randomisation)
Discharged on Preventative Treatment or Alteration in Dosage of Preventative Treatment During Index Hospitalisation
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants discharged on preventative treatment having not been on preventative treatment prior to index hospitalisation, or alteration of dosage of preventative treatment during index hospitalisation, i.e. change in prevention treatment during index hospitalisation.
1 year (post randomisation)
Length of Stay for Index Hospitalisation
Time Frame: A maximum follow up of one-year post-randomisation.
Length of Stay for Index Hospitalisation visit, measured in days each participants was hospitalised prior to their discharge. There is no maximum length an index hospitalisation might be for an individual participant, but follow up of participants is for a maximum one year.
A maximum follow up of one-year post-randomisation.
Representation or Rehospitalisation With Suspected ACS/ Recurrent Chest Pain After Index Hospitalisation
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Number of participants who represented or were rehospitalised with suspected acute coronary syndrome/recurrent chest pain after discharge from index hospitalisation, up to one year after randomisation
1 year (post randomisation)
Radiation Exposure From CTCA as Trial Intervention
Time Frame: 1 year (post randomisation)
Median effective radiation dose (mSv) from CTCA received by participants in the CTCA arm of the study. Value derived from dose length product (mGy/cm) using conversion factor of 0.014 mSv/mGy/cm.
1 year (post randomisation)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alasdair J Gray, NHS Lothian

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

November 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on CT Coronary Angiogram

Subscribe