Rapid Assessment of Potential Ischaemic Heart Disease With CTCA (RAPID-CTCA)

August 27, 2020 updated by: University of Edinburgh

The Role of Early CT Coronary Angiography in the Evaluation, Intervention and Outcome of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Suspected or Confirmed Acute Coronary Syndrome.

This study aims to investigate the effect of early CTCA in patients with suspected or confirmed Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) or Medical Assessment Unit (MAU), upon interventions, event rates and health care costs in a pragmatic clinical trial and economic evaluation up to 1 year after the trial intervention. The primary objective will be to investigate the effect of the intervention on all-cause death or subsequent type 1 or type 4b MI at one year, measured as time to first such event.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

DESIGN: Open parallel group randomised controlled trial of early computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients presenting with suspected/confirmed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to Emergency Departments (ED) and Medical Assessment Units.

SETTING: 37 EDs, radiology, cardiology and acute medical services in tertiary/district general National Health Service (NHS) hospitals.

TARGET POPULATION: Inclusion Criteria: Patient ≥18 years with symptoms mandating investigation for suspected or confirmed ACS with at least one of: ECG abnormalities e.g. ST segment depression >0.5 mm; History of ischaemic heart disease (where the clinician assessing patient confirms history based on patient history or available records); Troponin elevation above the 99th centile of the normal reference range or increase in high sensitivity troponin meeting European Society of Cardiology criteria for 'rule-in' or myocardial infarction (NB troponin assays will vary from site to site; local laboratory reference standards will be used). Exclusion Criteria: 1.Signs, symptoms, or investigations supporting high-risk ACS: ST elevation MI; ACS with signs or symptoms of acute heart failure or circulatory shock; Crescendo episodes of typical anginal pain; Marked or dynamic ECG changes e.g. ST depression of >3 mm; Clinical team have scheduled early invasive coronary angiography on day of trial eligibility assessment. 2. Patient inability to undergo CT: Severe renal failure (serum creatinine >250 µmol/L or estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min); Contrast allergy; Beta blocker intolerance (if no alternative heart rate limiting agent available/suitable) or allergy; Inability to breath hold; Atrial fibrillation (where mean heart rate is anticipated to be greater than 75 beats per minute after beta blockade). 3. Patient has had invasive coronary angiography or CTCA within last 2 years and the previous investigation revealed obstructive coronary artery disease, or patient had either investigation within the last 5 years and the result was normal. 4.Previous recruitment to the trial; 5.Known pregnancy or currently breast feeding; 6. Inability to consent; 7.Further investigation for ACS would not in the patient's interest, due to limited life expectancy, quality of life or functional status; 8.Prisoners

HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES BEING ASSESSED: Early use of ≥64-slice CTCA as part of routine assessment compared to standard care.

MEASUREMENT OF COSTS/OUTCOMES: Primary end-point will be one-year all-cause death or subsequent type 1 or type 4b MI at one year, measured as time to first such event. Secondary endpoints: Key Secondary Endpoints : 1. Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) death or subsequent non-fatal MI; 2. Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) death or subsequent non-fatal MI; 3. Subsequent non-fatal MI; 4.Coronary Heart Disease death; 5. Cardiovascular death; 6. All-cause death. Other Endpoints; Coronary

Heart Disease (CHD) death or subsequent non-fatal MI (type 1 or 4b);Subsequent Non-fatal MI (type 1 or 4b); Non-cardiovascular death; Invasive coronary angiography; Coronary revascularisation; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery bypass graft; Proportion of patients prescribed ACS therapies during index hospitalisation; Proportion of patients discharged on preventative treatment or have alteration in dosage of preventative treatment during index hospitalisation; Length of stay for index hospitalisation; Representation or rehospitalisation with suspected ACS/recurrent chest pain within 12 months after index hospitalisation; Chest pain symptoms up to 12 months; Patient satisfaction at 1 month; Clinician certainty of presenting diagnosis after CTCA; Quality of Life (measured by EQ- 5D-5L up to12 months). Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events; Proportion of patients with alternative cardiovascular diagnoses identified on CTCA; Proportion of patients with non-cardiovascular diagnosis identified on CTCA; Radiation exposure from CTCA as trial intervention. Cost effectiveness:

Estimated in terms of the lifetime incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

SAMPLE SIZE: 1,749 patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1749

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • St Helier, Jersey
        • Jersey General Hospital
      • Basildon, United Kingdom
        • Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • Belfast, United Kingdom
        • Ulster Hospital
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom
        • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
      • Bournemouth, United Kingdom
        • The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospital
      • Bradford, United Kingdom
        • Bradford Royal Infirmary
      • Dudley, United Kingdom
        • Russells Hall Hospital
      • Dundee, United Kingdom
        • Ninewells Hospital
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA
        • Royal Infirmary Edinburgh
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
        • Glasgow Royal Infirmary
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
        • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
      • Inverness, United Kingdom
        • Raigmore Hospital
      • Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom
        • Victoria Hospital
      • Leeds, United Kingdom
        • Leeds General Infirmary
      • Lewisham, United Kingdom
        • University Hospital Lewisham
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Royal London Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • St. Thomas' Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • University Hospital North Tees
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Whipps Cross Hospital
      • Luton, United Kingdom
        • Luton & Dunstable Hospital
      • Melrose, United Kingdom
        • Borders General Hospital
      • Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
        • Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
      • Newcastle, United Kingdom
        • Royal Victoria Infirmary
      • Plymouth, United Kingdom
        • Derriford Hospital
      • Portsmouth, United Kingdom
        • Queen Alexandra Hospital
      • Reading, United Kingdom
        • Royal Berkshire NHS foundation trust
      • Redhill, United Kingdom
        • East Surrey Hospital
      • Rotherham, United Kingdom
        • Rotherham Hospital
      • Sandwell, United Kingdom
        • Sandwell General Hospital
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom
        • Northern General Hospital
      • Southampton, United Kingdom
        • University Hospital Southampton Nhs Foundation Trust
      • Stoke, United Kingdom
        • University Hospitals of the Midlands
      • Torquay, United Kingdom
        • Torbay Hospital
      • Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
        • New Cross Hospital
      • Worcester, United Kingdom
        • Worcestershire Royal Hospital
      • Wrexham, United Kingdom
        • Wrexham Maelor Hospital
      • Wythenshawe, United Kingdom
        • University Hospital South Manchester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Patient ≥18 years with symptoms mandating investigation for suspected or confirmed ACS with at least one of:

  • ECG abnormalities e.g. ST segment depression >0.5 mm;
  • History of ischaemic heart disease (where the clinician assessing patient confirms history based on patient history or available records);
  • Troponin elevation above the 99th centile of the normal reference range or increase in high sensitivity troponin meeting European Society of Cardiology criteria for 'rule-in' or myocardial infarction (NB troponin assays will vary from site to site; local laboratory reference standards will be used).

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Signs, symptoms, or investigations supporting high-risk ACS:

    • ST elevation MI;
    • ACS with signs or symptoms of acute heart failure or circulatory shock;
    • Crescendo episodes of typical anginal pain;
    • Marked or dynamic ECG changes e.g. ST depression of >3 mm
    • Clinical team have scheduled early invasive coronary angiography on day of trial eligibility assessment.
  • Patient inability to undergo CT:

    • Severe renal failure (serum creatinine >250 µmol/L or estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min);
    • Contrast allergy;
    • Beta blocker intolerance (if no alternative heart rate limiting agent available/suitable) or allergy ;
    • Inability to breath hold;
    • Atrial fibrillation (where mean heart rate is anticipated to be greater than 75 beats per minute after beta blockade).
  • Patient has had invasive coronary angiography or CTCA within last 2 years and the previous investigation revealed obstructive coronary artery disease, or patient had either investigation within the last 5 years and the result was normal.
  • Previous recruitment to the trial;
  • Known pregnancy or currently breast feeding;
  • Inability to consent;
  • Further investigation for ACS would not in the patient's interest, due to limited life expectancy, quality of life or functional status;
  • Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CT Coronary Angiogram
CT Coronary Angiogram plus standard care
Completion of a CT Coronary Angiogram
No Intervention: Standard Care
Standard care only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary end-point will be all-cause death or subsequent non-fatal type 1 or type 4b MI at one year, measured as time to first such event.
Time Frame: 1 year
Myocardial infarction will be defined according to the most recent Universal Definition [Thygesen K, 2012] and will be adjudicated by two independent cardiologists blinded to the intervention.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) death or subsequent non-fatal MI
Time Frame: 1 year
Death or MI
1 year
Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) death or subsequent non-fatal MI
Time Frame: 1 year
CVD Death
1 year
Subsequent Non-fatal MI
Time Frame: 1 year
MI
1 year
Coronary Heart Disease death
Time Frame: 1 year
CHD Death
1 year
Cardiovascular death
Time Frame: 1 year
CVS Death
1 year
All-cause death
Time Frame: 1 year
Death
1 year
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) death or subsequent non-fatal MI (type 1 or 4b)
Time Frame: 1 year
CHD and MI
1 year
Subsequent Non-fatal MI (type 1 or 4b)
Time Frame: 1 year
Non Fatal MI
1 year
Non-cardiovascular death
Time Frame: 1 year
Non CVS Death
1 year
Invasive coronary angiography
Time Frame: 1 year
Angiography procedures
1 year
Coronary revascularisation
Time Frame: 1 year
Revascularisation procedures
1 year
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Time Frame: 1 year
PCI interventions
1 year
Coronary artery bypass graft
Time Frame: 1 year
CABG procedures
1 year
Proportion of patients prescribed ACS therapies during index hospitalisation
Time Frame: 1 year
ACS therapies
1 year
Proportion of patients discharged on preventative treatment or have alteration in dosage of preventative treatment during index hospitalisation
Time Frame: 1 year
Preventative treatments
1 year
Length of Stay for Index Hospitalisation
Time Frame: 1 year
Length of Stay
1 year
Representation or rehospitalisation with suspected ACS/recurrent chest pain within 12 months after index hospitalisation
Time Frame: 1 year
Hospital attendances for ACS
1 year
Chest pain symptoms up to 12 months
Time Frame: 1 year
Patient symptoms measured by ROSE questionnaire
1 year
Quality of Life (measured by EQ-5D-5L up to 12 months)
Time Frame: 1 year
Quality of life measured by EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
1 year
Patient satisfaction at 1 month
Time Frame: 1 year
Participant questionnaire (11 questions) asking their viewpoint on the care they received during their baseline admission.
1 year
Clinician certainty of presenting diagnosis after CTCA
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinician certainty
1 year
Proportion of patients with alternative cardiovascular diagnoses identified on CTCA
Time Frame: 1 year
Safety assessment AE and SAEs
1 year
Proportion of patients with non-cardiovascular diagnosis identified on CTCA
Time Frame: 1 year
Safety Assessment AEs and SAEs
1 year
Radiation exposure from CTCA as trial intervention
Time Frame: 1 year
Safety Assessment AEs and SAEs
1 year
Cost effectiveness
Time Frame: 1 year
Estimated in terms of the lifetime incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on CT Coronary Angiogram

3
Subscribe