Evaluation for the Individualization of Therapy in Adenocarcinomas of the Gastroesophageal Junction (MEMORI)

November 22, 2023 updated by: Technical University of Munich

Metabolic and Molecular Response Evaluation for the Individualization of Therapy in Adenocarcinomas of the Gastroesophageal Junction

Metabolic and Molecular Response evaluation for the individualization of therapy in adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction by evaluation of the R0 resection rate for patients with metabolically (ie, according to PET criteria) chemotherapy-resistant locally advanced AEG, who receive an intensified neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (INRCT). Additonal efforts will be done by investigation of molecular and metabolic biomarkers in relation to their predictive and prognostic value by correlating them with histopathologic responses and clinical outcome in an exploratory approach.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction (AEG) are clinically-topographically divided into subtypes I-III according to the Siewert classification and show an increased incidence. Neoadjuvant and/or perioperative chemotherapy or preoperative radiochemotherapy is well established in the management of AEG. However, a significant number of patients do not respond to preoperative chemotherapy, suffering from toxicity and facing a worse outcome due to lower R0 resection rates. Previous results from the MUNICON-1 and MUNICON-2 trials have shown that PET-based therapy individualization can be successfully integrated in neoadjuvant treatment algorithms.

Tumor-free resection edges (R0) constitute the greatest prognostic advantage in terms of overall survival. However, the R0 resection rates for patients who, according to early metabolic response evaluation, have not responded to the chemotherapy, have not been satisfactory, even after conversion to an - albeit moderate - radiochemotherapy in the MUNICON-2 trial. Thus, this patient population (so-called non responders) so far lack a beneficial neoadjuvant therapy modality.

Based on these results, the primary goal of MEMORI study is to evaluate the R0 resection rate for patients with metabolically (ie, according to PET criteria) chemotherapy-resistant locally advanced AEG, who receive an intensified neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (INRCT). Secondary it is planned to investigate molecular and metabolic biomarkers in relation to their predictive and prognostic value by correlating them with histopathologic responses and clinical outcome in an exploratory approach.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81675
        • 2nd department of the Medical Clinic of the Technical University Munich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed AEG I-III
  • Potentially R0 - resectable AEG and primary tumor category UT2 -4
  • Functional operability : Exclusion of OP - limiting comorbidities
  • Intense FDG tracer uptake of the tumor during Baseline PET/CT examination and thus suitability for monitoring and early response prediction by FDG - PET ( [ 18F ] - FDG uptake in the tumor at baseline > 1.35 x liver SUV + 2 x standard deviation of the liver SUV)
  • Performance status (ECOG ) 0 or 1
  • Age : ≥ 18
  • creatinine clearance > 60ml/min measured in a 24 h urine or calculated with the Cockgroft -Gault formula
  • bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal , serum transaminases (GOT

    / GPT ) ≤ 3 times ULN

  • leukocytes ≥ 3.5 g / l, platelet ≥ 100 g / l
  • Negative pregnancy test (determination of beta- HCG in urine or serum) in women of childbearing potential
  • A signed consent form after implementation of medical education

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Existing distant metastases (M1b)
  • Tumor infiltration into the tracheobronchial system
  • Previous radiotherapy targeted at the thorax
  • Lack of ability of the patient to adhere to the protocol rules
  • Manifest heart failure despite optimal medication> NYHA I
  • existing angina pectoris at rest or undergoing stress without clarification via interventional cardiology and / or myocardial infarction within the last 6 months
  • Existing pregnancy or lactation
  • childbearing or fertility without using recognized safe methods of contraception
  • Coexisting other malignant diseases with the exception of a non-melanomatuous, localized skin tumor or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • absence of a signed consent form

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-Responder
Oxaliplatin Epirubicin Capecitabine 5-FU Carboplatin Paclitaxel Radiation Biopsy
50 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Taxomedac
130 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Oxaliplan
50 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Epi Teva
625 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Xeloda
200 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • 5-FU medac
2 mg/ml min
Other Names:
  • Carboplatin SUN
total dosage 41,4 Gy
Other Names:
  • intensitive neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (INRCT)
translational analysis
Other Names:
  • esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Active Comparator: Responder
Oxaliplatin Epirubicin Capecitabine 5-FU Biopsy
130 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Oxaliplan
50 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Epi Teva
625 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Xeloda
200 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • 5-FU medac
translational analysis
Other Names:
  • esophagogastroduodenoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
R0 resection rate
Time Frame: 1 day of surgery (in between day 28 to day 43 after radio-chemotherapy)
R0 resection rate of patients suffering from metabolically (following PET criteria) chemotherapy-resistant, locally advanced AEG, who receive a more intensive neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (INRCT)
1 day of surgery (in between day 28 to day 43 after radio-chemotherapy)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Regression
Time Frame: 1 day of surgery (in between day 28 to day 43 after radio-chemotherapy)
Histological regression defined by Becker Criteria
1 day of surgery (in between day 28 to day 43 after radio-chemotherapy)
Overall survival
Time Frame: from day 0 to follow up visit 6 (24 months after surgery)
Overall survival defined as period from start of study to death (if necessary censored by end of follow-up period)
from day 0 to follow up visit 6 (24 months after surgery)
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: from day 0 to follow up visit 6 (24 months after surgery)
Disease-free survival, defined as period from start of study to earlier occurring event: death or relapse until end of follow-up; Relapse will be separated into events of "local failure", "distant failure" and "local and distant failure"
from day 0 to follow up visit 6 (24 months after surgery)
Metabilic response rate
Time Frame: from day 0 to one time point of time period day 14 to 28 after chemotherapy
Metabolic response rate under neoadjuvant chemotherapy
from day 0 to one time point of time period day 14 to 28 after chemotherapy
Translational analysis
Time Frame: 1 day of surgery (in between day 28 to day 43 after radio-chemotherapy)
Translational analysis for identification of tumor determinants relevant for prognosis and therapy
1 day of surgery (in between day 28 to day 43 after radio-chemotherapy)
Adverse Events
Time Frame: from day 0 to follow up visit 6 (24 months after surgery)
Occurence of AEs
from day 0 to follow up visit 6 (24 months after surgery)
QLQ-C30
Time Frame: from day 0 to follow up visit 6 (24 months after surgery)
Quality of life, analyzed via EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires
from day 0 to follow up visit 6 (24 months after surgery)
QLQ-OG25
Time Frame: from day 0 to follow up visit 6 (24 months after surgery)
Quality of life, analyzed via EORTC QLQ-OG25 questionnaires
from day 0 to follow up visit 6 (24 months after surgery)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jens Siveke, Prof. Dr., II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar (MRI) der TUM,Ismaninger Str. 22

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 5, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 7, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

November 10, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

Clinical Trials on Paclitaxel

3
Subscribe