A Finnish Community Randomized Psychotherapy Effectiveness Study for Major Depression

December 9, 2014 updated by: HSaloheimo, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Lohja Depression Treatment Study is a randomized treatment trial which compares three approaches for treatment of depression:1) Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT), 2) Psychoeducational Group Treatment ( PeGT) and 3) Treatment as Usual (TAU). This Trial aims to test and adapt known short term treatment models for Finnish patients and circumstances.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients having signs of depression referred to Lohja area secondary level psychiatric clinics were assessed to the trial. After verification the diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) they were informed of the study. Consented patients were randomized to three study arms.

Baseline clinical demographics was collected. Psychotherapeutic treatment was implemented by specially trained therapists and the study data was collected by trained psychiatrists who were blinded to the therapy model patients has received.Primary outcome measure was 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and secondary outcome measures were Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale ( SOFAS), Social Adaptation Scale ( Finnish translation JES) and Quality of Life assessment ( a Finnish validated questionnaire 15-D).The total of sick leave days and number of possible disability pensions in a year were assessed as well.

Assessments were implemented at the beginning, at 1,5 month, at 3 months ( which was the end of active treatment of short-term psychotherapies), at 6 months and at 12 months.

The primary assessment was planned to carry out using tests of group comparison. Sample size of 32 and 32 achieve 91% power to detect a clinically meaningful difference with a significance level (alpha) of 0.01 using two-sided two-sample t-test. Baseline differences in demographic variables and the depression measurement across the three treatment groups were tested using chi-square tests and analysis of variance.Likelihood-based inference using linear mixed models were employed to analyze treatment effects, focusing on the time x treatment interaction. Separate analyses assessed IPT-TAU and PeGT-TAU comparisons. All statistical analyses were performed using R. The aim of this study was to get a total of 140-160 patients, about 50 patients on one group.The final number of patients showed to be 134.

The statistical calculation was intent-to-treat model with consideration to missing data, because in this kind of natural setting notable attrition was assumed. The training of the therapists and researchers and quality control during assessments was considered and personnel was supervised throughout the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major Depressive Disorder - diagnosed
  • Comorbid anxiety disorders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychosis
  • Suicidal patients
  • Serious acute somatic illness
  • Inability to read and write
  • alcohol dependence or use of illicit drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Interpersonal Psychotherapy
Interpersonal Psychotherapy treatment for MDD patients was implemented with antidepressant pharmacotherapy by national Quidelines for the treatment of Patients with depression. Intervention:Interpersonal psychotherapy as ADD-on method. Outcome was compared with patients in treatment as usual group.
Patients were treated with IPT method, which was an active comparator vs treatment as usual
Patients were treated with PeGt method which was an active comparatos vs treatment as usual
Active Comparator: Psychoeducational Group Therapy
Psychoeducational Group Therapy arm for MDD patients with antidepressant pharmacotherapy by national Quidelines for the treatment of Patients with depression. Intervention: Psychoeducational Group Treatment as ADD-on method.
Patients were treated with IPT method, which was an active comparator vs treatment as usual
Patients were treated with PeGt method which was an active comparatos vs treatment as usual
No Intervention: Treatment as Usual
Treatment as usual ( consisting of supportive psychodynamic-oriented treatment) with antidepressant pharmacotherapy by national Quidelines for the treatment of Patients with depression

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline Clinical Global Impression, severity and change at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Change from baseline Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Heikki O Katila, MD Ph.D., University of Helsinki

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 11, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Lohja Depression Treatment

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder, Major

Clinical Trials on Interpersonal Psychotherapy

3
Subscribe