Capecitabine ON Temozolomide Radionuclide Therapy Octreotate Lutetium-177 NeuroEndocrine Tumours Study (CONTROL NETS)

Two parallel phase II randomized open label trials of Lutetium-177 Octreotate (177Lu-Octreotate) peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and capecitabine (CAP)/temozolomide (TEM) chemotherapy (chemo): (i) versus CAPTEM alone in the treatment of low to intermediate grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs); (ii) versus PRRT alone in the treatment of low to intermediate grade mid gut neuroendocrine tumours (mNETs).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS

Background

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies that can arise at any site in the gastrointestinal tract, that are known by their ability to over express somatostatin receptors. Originally called carcinoid tumours, these tumours are rising in incidence. In patients with incurable disease, several systemic options have demonstrated activity but few have been compared in prospective, randomised controlled trials (RCTs). 177Lu-Octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and CAPTEM have shown promising activity in initial single arm trials. Prospective RCTs are needed to build on these early trials to determine the optimal role of these therapies in clinical practice.

CONTROL NETs is a parallel group phase II randomised open label trial of Lutetium-177 Octreotate (177Lu-Octreotate (Lutate)) peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and capecitabine (CAP)/temozolomide (TEM) chemotherapy (chemotherapy): (i) versus CAPTEM alone in the treatment of low to intermediate grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs); (ii) versus PRRT alone in the treatment of low to intermediate grade midgut neuroendocrine tumours (mNETs).

General aim

i) To determine the relative activity of CAPTEM/PRRT in biopsy-proven, low to intermediate grade, unresectable, metastatic 68Ga-octreotate PET-avid NETs in the following parallel phase II studies: Group A: pNETs and Group B: mNETs.

ii) To inform future comparative phase III RCTs to determine the optimal therapies in pNETs and mNETs.

Design

Two parallel non-comparative group randomised, controlled, multi-centre phase II, 2 arm open-label controlled trials with 2:1 allocation (experimental : control)

  1. Study A: pNETs: PRRT/CAPTEM vs. CAPTEM (control)
  2. Study B: mNETs: PRRT/CAPTEM vs. PRRT (control)

Randomisation will be performed using the method of minimisation.

Patients will be stratified by:

  • Previous systemic therapy regimens (0,1 v 2)
  • WHO tumour grade: Low Grade - G1 (Ki67<3% (mitotic count <2)) vs. Intermediate Grade - G2 (Ki67 3-20% (mitotic count 2-20))
  • visceral only vs. visceral with bone metastases
  • Treating institution

Population

The target population for this study is consenting adult patients with advanced, unresectable low or intermediate grade (Ki-67<20%) midgut neuroendocrine tumours (mNETs) or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs ), who have received ≤ 2 prior systemic therapies for advanced unresectable disease (including long acting somatostatin analogues).

Assessments

  • Patients will be assessed at each treatment cycle for toxicity
  • CT including a 3 phase contrast CT of the liver will be undertaken at baseline, then every 2 months (pNET) or every 4 months (pNET) until radiologic progression by RECIST v1.1.
  • 68Ga-DOTATATE PET CT Scan will be undertaken at baseline, then every 4 months until radiologic progression by RECIST v1.1.
  • 18F-FDG PET Scan may be performed at the discretion of treating clinician at baseline, then every 2 months until radiologic progression by RECIST v1.1) for G2 NETS.
  • 24-h whole-body planar gamma imaging will be undertaken on the day after administration of PRRT (every 2 months).
  • Serum biomarkers will be undertaken every 4 months until disease progression.
  • Quality of life assessments will be undertaken at every 2 months until disease progression using QLC C30 and QLQ-GINET21.
  • Health utilities will be evaluated with EQ-5D-5L every 2 months until completion of study follow up.

Statistical considerations

Both studies are based on a Simon's two-stage design and are randomised using a 2:1 randomisation (Experimental: Control). A mix of approximately 30% G1 patients and 70% G2 patients is expected.

Study A, pNETs (n=90) will have 80% power with 95% confidence interval to exclude a 12 months PFS of 60% in favour of a more interesting rate of 77% in the experimental arm.

For Study B, mNETs (n=75), the PFS at 24 months in the control arm is expected to be 52%. Thus study B will have 80% power with 95% confidence interval to demonstrate a PFS rate at 24 months of 70% in experimental arm, a result that would warrant further investigation.

A total sample size of 165 patients for the two studies will be accrued over 2 years.

Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2065
        • Royal North Shore Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Herston, Queensland, Australia, 4029
        • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
    • Victoria
      • East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 8006
        • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
    • Western Australia
      • Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia, 6150
        • Fiona Stanley Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults ≥18 years old with histologically proven, moderate to well-differentiated G1/2 pancreatic or midgut NETs with Ki-67 < 20%;
  • The presence of somatostatin receptor avidity suitable for PRRT demonstrated on 68Ga-octreotate PET scan;
  • Progressive advanced/metastatic disease that has progressed during or after ≤ 2 prior systemic therapies;
  • Unresectable disease, determined by an appropriately specialized surgeon or deemed not suitable for liver directed therapies where liver is the only site of disease;
  • ECOG performance status 0-2;
  • Ability to swallow oral medication;
  • Adequate renal function (measured creatinine clearance > 50 ml/min by DTPA or 51CR-EDTA), bone marrow function (Hb > 9 g/d/L, ANC > 1.5 x109L, and platelets > 100 x 10/L);
  • Adequate liver function (serum total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 2.5 x ULN (≤ 5 x ULN for patients with liver metastases)). INR ≤ 1.5 (or on a stable dose of LMW heparin for >2 weeks at time of enrolment .);
  • Life expectancy of at least 9 months;
  • Study treatment both planned and able to start within 28 days of randomisation; )
  • Willing and able to comply with all study requirements, including treatment, timing and/or nature of required assessments;
  • Signed, written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary NETs other than small bowel (midgut) or pancreatic NETs;
  • Cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or biotherapy within the last four weeks;
  • Prior intrahepatic 90Y microspheres, such as SIR-Spheres in the past six months;
  • Prior Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy;
  • Major surgery/surgical therapy for any cause within one month;
  • Surgical therapy of loco-regional metastases within the last three months prior to randomisation;
  • Uncontrolled metastatic disease to the central nervous system. To be eligible, CNS metastases should have been treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy and the patient should have been receiving a stable dose of steroids for at least 2 weeks prior to randomisation, with no deterioration in neurological symptoms during this time;
  • Poorly controlled concurrent medical illness. E.g. unstable diabetes (Note: optimal glycaemic control should be achieved before starting trial therapy); Symptomatic NYHA class III or IV congestive cardiac failure, myocardial infarction within 6 months of start of the study, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, unstable angina, or any other clinically significant cardiac disease;
  • History of other malignancies within 5 years except where treated with curative intent AND with no current evidence of disease AND considered not to be at risk of future recurrence Patients with a past history of adequately treated carcinoma-in-situ, basal cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder are eligible;
  • Any uncontrolled known active infection, including chronic active hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV. Testing for these is not mandatory unless clinically indicated. Participants with known Hepatitis B/C infection will be allowed to participate providing evidence of viral suppression has been documented and the patient remains on appropriate anti-viral therapy;
  • Impairment of gastrointestinal function or gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of capecitabine/temozolomide (e.g., ulcerative disease, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome or substantial small bowel resection);
  • Presence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule, including alcohol dependence or drug abuse;
  • Pregnancy, lactation, or inadequate contraception. Women must be post-menopausal, infertile, or use a reliable means of contraception. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 7 days prior to registration. Men must have been surgically sterilised or use a (double if required) barrier method of contraception .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PRRT
7.8GBq 177Lu Octreotate (Lutate) given intravenously (IV) on day 1 every 8 weeks for 4 cycles.
7.8GBq 177Lu Octreotate (Lutate) given intravenously (IV)
Other Names:
  • lutate
Active Comparator: CAPTEM
Oral capecitabine 750mg/m2 b.i.d. days 1-14 and temozolomide 75mg/m2 b.i.d. days 10-14 every 28 day cycle, up to 8 cycles.
oral capecitabine 750mg/m2 b.i.d.
Other Names:
  • Xeloda
temozolomide 75mg/m2 b.i.d.
Experimental: PRRT/CAPTEM
7.8GBq 177Lu Octreotate (Lutate) given intravenously (IV) on day 10 every 8 weeks for 4 cycles, with concurrent oral capecitabine 750mg/m2 b.i.d. days 1-14 and temozolomide 75mg/m2 b.i.d. days 10-14 up to 4 cycles.
7.8GBq 177Lu Octreotate (Lutate) given intravenously (IV)
Other Names:
  • lutate
oral capecitabine 750mg/m2 b.i.d.
Other Names:
  • Xeloda
temozolomide 75mg/m2 b.i.d.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: 12 months for pNETs and 24 months for mNets
To determine the rate of progression free survival (PFS) at 12 months in pNETs (Group A), and at 24 months in mNETs (Group B). (PFS defined from time of randomisation to disease progression as defined by RECIST criteria version 1.1).
12 months for pNETs and 24 months for mNets

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective tumour response rate (partial or complete response) as per RECIST v1.1 criteria
Time Frame: 12 months or 24 months as appropriate
To determine objective tumour response rate (OTRR) (partial or complete response (PR/CR)).
12 months or 24 months as appropriate
Overall survival (death from any cause)
Time Frame: 12 months or 24 months as appropriate
To determine overall survival (OS) (death from any cause).
12 months or 24 months as appropriate
Safety (rates of adverse events worst grade according to NCI CTCAE v4.0)
Time Frame: 12 months or 24 months as appropriate
To determine safety (rates of adverse events).
12 months or 24 months as appropriate
Quality of life (QOL scores determined at beginning, during treatment and until disease progression)
Time Frame: 12 months or 24 months as appropriate
To determine Quality of Life (QoL) (QoL scores from EORTC QLQ C30 and QLQ-GINET21 questionnaires)
12 months or 24 months as appropriate
Resource utilisation (use of healthcare resources) and cost-effectiveness (Health utility score determined at beginning, during treatment and until end of follow up, correlated with MBS & PBS data)
Time Frame: 12 months or 24 months as appropriate
To determine resource utilization (costs associated with treatment regimen, MBS and PBS data, and health utilities scores from EQ-5D-5L).
12 months or 24 months as appropriate
Clinical Benefit
Time Frame: 12 months or 24 months as appropriate
To evaluate the proportion of patients who have experienced a clinical benefit of the regimen(s). (Clinical Benefit is defined as the proportion of patients who experience complete or partial response (using RECIST v1.1) or stable disease at 12 months or 24 months as appropriate).
12 months or 24 months as appropriate

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
biomarkers CgA, Ki-67 and tumour MGMT expression with survival, response and safety.
Time Frame: 12 months or 24 months as appropriate
To correlate circulating & tissue biomarkers with clinical study endpoints (relating to survival, response and safety), including but not limited to CgA, Ki-67 & tumour MGMT expression.
12 months or 24 months as appropriate
Other measures of response such as 68Ga-DOTATATE, SUVmax, tumour update and other measures of response of a biochemical measure such as tumour markers, chomogranin A and patient reported outcomes.
Time Frame: 12 months or 24 months as appropriate
Explore correlation between other measures of response relevant to this disease, eg 68Ga-DOTATATE, SUVmax tumour uptake, and other measures of response of a biochemical measure, eg. tumour markers, chromogranin A, and patient reported outcomes QOL undertaken in order to identify how progressive symptoms or biochemical response relates to conventional measures of response using structural and/or functional imaging. A formal statistical analysis plan will be formulated prior to final data analysis.
12 months or 24 months as appropriate

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nick Pavlakis, Associate Professor, Royal North Shore Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 9, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumours

Clinical Trials on octreotate

3
Subscribe