SENTINEL : Impact of the Use of a Web-application for the Detection of Lung Cancer Relapse (SENTINEL)

June 25, 2020 updated by: Weprom

Phase 3 Multicentric Randomized Study Assessing Self-reported Symptoms Transmitted Via an Internet Web-application " Sentinel " Versus Conventional Follow-up in Patients With High Risk Lung Cancer (SENTINEL)

This is a study that evaluates an optimization of the monitoring of patients with lung cancer in order to extend the survival of patients by improving their quality of life and decreasing anxiety generated by the achievement of balance sheets imaging. The spacing of the follow-up imaging also helps to reduce the cost of such monitoring. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the overall survival of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

With a 5-year survival of about 15% pulmonary cancer is very poor prognosis. About 70 to 75% of cancers are diagnosed at advanced stages. Relapses are common and rarely curable. At least 75% of relapses are symptomatic and there is no standard monitoring after curative treatment or not. Currently, the most common monitoring strategy involves the completion of a clinical examination every 3 to 6 months associated with chest X-ray or CT-scan.

An intensive clinical and imaging monitoring has not yet shown any survival advantage but monitoring of symptoms appears to have a significant medical and economic advantage compared to imaging monitoring. This non-personalized approach is a source of anxiety for patients, especially with the approach of the date of the imaging assessment. In contrast, this monitoring can leave symptomatic patients with untreated relapse for several weeks because many symptomatic patients wait the date of the imaging assessment to consult.

the investigators have developed a score based on the dynamics and the association of clinical signs to alert the physician to a possible recurrence of lung cancer. The referring physician is alerted so early and convenes the patient for a checkup. One of the explanations which could demonstrate the gain in survival is the possibility offered by the application SENTINEL is to treat the relapses earlier, thus avoiding to wait a too much important deterioration of general condition between two monitoring follow-up more or less spaced.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

133

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49933
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
      • Angers, France, 49933
        • Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin
      • Avignon, France, 84918
        • Institut Sainte Catherine
      • Chartres, France, 28018
        • Centre Hospitalier General
      • La Roche Sur Yon, France, 85925
        • Centre Hospitalier Départemenal
      • Le Mans, France, 72000
        • Centre Jean Bernard
      • Le Mans, France, 72037
        • Centre Hospitalier
      • Nantes, France, 44202
        • Centre Catherine de Sienne
      • Saint Herblain, France, 44805
        • Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site René Gauducheau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC), histologically proven
  2. Patient at high risk of relapse (TxN1, IIIA, IIIB, IV stages)
  3. Age ≥ 18 ans
  4. PS ≤ 2 within 15 days before enrollment
  5. Patient having:

    • finished his cancer treatment in the last 3 months by:

      • Surgery or
      • Surgery then adjuvant chemotherapy or
      • Concomitant radio-chemotherapy or
      • Conventional or stereotactic radiotherapy or
      • 1st or 2nd line chemotherapy
    • treatment with TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in 1st or 2nd line or maintenance treatment with Alimta® and / or Avastin® or Gemzar® well tolerated (SENTINEL 's score with this treatment (TKI or maintenance) to its latest assessment.
  6. Patient with an initial SENTINEL score ≤ 6
  7. Patient with internet access and an e-mail box
  8. Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
  9. Patient has given its written consent before any specific procedure from protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient whose disease has progressed at the end of the specific treatment
  2. Symptomatic brain metastases
  3. Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship or curators
  4. Dementia, mental alteration or psychiatric pathology that can compromise informed consent from the patient and / or adherence to the protocol and the monitoring of the trial
  5. Patient who cannot submit himself to the followed of the protocol for psychological reasons, social, family or geographical
  6. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  7. Patient participating in another interventional study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Monitoring by SENTINEL application
Patients randomized to this arm will connect once a week to SENTINEL application to do a self-evaluation of several symptoms. A CT- scan will be scheduled only when there is an alert of the application.
Patients will connect once a week to SENTINEL application to do a self-evaluation of several symptoms. A CT- scan will be scheduled only when there is an alert of the application
Other Names:
  • new technology
No Intervention: Conventional Monitoring
Patients randomized to this arm will have a CT-scan every 3 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 24 months
Overall survival is defined as the period between the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. We will also evaluate in this context the overall survival defined between the date of diagnosis and date of death whatever the cause in order to know more precisely the duration of the disease.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: 12 month
The quality of life will be studied using the questionnaire FACT-L at baseline and follow-up visits at 3, 6 and 12 months.
12 month
Depression
Time Frame: 12 month
Patient's depression will be assessed through the questionnaire HUMEUR PHQ9 at baseline and follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months.
12 month
Relapse detection time
Time Frame: 24 month
The relapse detection time is defined as time from the date of diagnosis to the date of highlighting of the recurrence by imaging
24 month
Performance Status (PS)
Time Frame: 24 month
Performance Status will be evaluated according to WHO recommendations.
24 month
Cost of monitoring
Time Frame: 24 month
The cost of monitoring will be evaluated from the perspective of health insurance.
24 month
Patient compliance
Time Frame: 24 month
Patient compliance to the use of SENTINEL application will be evaluated according to the number of assessments completed (usually 1 per week) compared to the theoretical maximum number filling weekly and monthly the application over time.
24 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fabrice DENIS, MD, Centre Jean Bernard - LE MANS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 3, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • WP-2018-01
  • 2014-A00263-44 (Other Identifier: RCB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Monitoring by SENTINEL application

3
Subscribe