Vasopressin and the Social Brain

August 8, 2017 updated by: Matthew Lieberman, University of California, Los Angeles

Vasopressin's Effect on Behavior and Neural Activity During Social Cognition Tasks

It has long been established that interpersonal relationships can have a profound impact on health and well-being. Yet, the investigators are still learning about the complex biological processes that contribute to positive social interactions and the ability to develop and maintain social relationships. Recent research has begun to focus on vasopressin, a neuropeptide that is naturally produced in the hypothalamus, because administration of this neuropeptide has been associated with empathy, cooperation, memory of social stimuli (e.g., faces), and brain activity in neural regions associated with social and emotional processes. To date, several aspects of vasopressin's effects on social behavior have been unexplored. As such, the overarching goal of this project is to examine the effects of intranasal vasopressin on several tasks involving learning and social processes. In addition, the investigators will explore associated neural activity through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Results from the study will inform our understanding of the neurobiology of socioemotional processes.

The investigators hypothesize that compared to placebo, vasopressin will improve deception detection, increase empathy and altruism, enhance responses to photo stimuli of primary caregivers, and improve learning when the subject has a prosocial goal of teaching another person. These effects will manifest in behavioral and neural activity. It is also hypothesized that main effects will not be found for vasopressin, but rather, analyses of relevant moderators will elucidate these findings.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095-1563
        • UCLA Department of Psychology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-30 years of age
  • Healthy (see below)
  • Fluent in English
  • Right-handed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who gave birth in the last six months, are currently pregnant, planning to become pregnant in the next 6 months, or currently breastfeeding women
  • Symptoms of runny nose due to allergies/cold or other reason
  • Current restricted fluid intake for any reason
  • Heart disease
  • Hypertension
  • History of myocardial infarction
  • History of cardiac arrhythmia
  • Kidney or liver disease
  • Vascular disease
  • Epilepsy
  • Migraine
  • Asthma
  • Nephritis
  • Diabetes and other endocrine diseases
  • Frequent or unexplained fainting
  • History of stroke
  • Aneurysm or brain hemorrhage
  • Active psychiatric diagnosis
  • Current psychopharmacologic treatment
  • Drug or alcohol abuse
  • Medical or neurological illness
  • Regular use of medication (e.g., vasoconstrictive medications)
  • Medication intake less than 2 weeks prior to study (5 weeks for fluoxetine) including daily non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Smoking more than 15 cigarettes a day
  • Consumption of any alcoholic beverages in the past 24 hours will be excluded
  • Elevated blood pressure (>135/90)
  • Low blood pressure (<90/55)
  • Body temperature >100.1 F
  • Left-handed
  • Claustrophobia
  • Presence of metal in their body

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intranasal vasopressin
Participants will self-administer 20 IU vasopressin (American Regent Pharmaceuticals). 5 puffs per nostril (1 puff = 2 IU vasopressin).
Through the use of 1oz bottles attached with metered nasal pumps (1 puff = .1ml), participants will self-administer 20 IU vasopressin (American Regent Pharmaceuticals). 5 puffs per nostril (1 puff = 2 IU vasopressin).
Placebo Comparator: Intranasal placebo
2 mls Glycerine and 3 mls purified water (methylparaben and propylparaben mixed according to purified water formula) for a total of 5 ml, which will be filtered with a 5mu filter. Participants will self-administer 5 puffs per nostril.
Through the use of 1oz bottles attached with metered nasal pumps (1 puff = .1ml), participants will self-administer 5 puffs per nostril. Placebo consists of: 2 mls Glycerine and 3 mls purified water (methylparaben and propylparaben mixed according to purified water formula) for a total of 5 ml, which will be filtered with a 5mu filter.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in neural brain activity, as observed by fMRI, when observing others during social inclusion vs. exclusion
Time Frame: Between 40-115 minutes post administration
Whole brain and region of interest (ROI) regression analysis will be used to compare the neural activity of participants in the vasopressin/placebo groups. A design matrix will be created for each participant, modeling activity that is greater during the exclusion portion of the cyberball task (Williams et al., 2012) versus the inclusion portion. A first-level analysis will compare [(friend exclusion>friend inclusion)>(stranger exclusion>stranger inclusion)] for each participant. A second-level group analysis will compare these first-level contrasts between the vasopressin and placebo groups.
Between 40-115 minutes post administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ratings of empathic concern after witnessing social exclusion in a friend or a stranger
Time Frame: Between 40-115 minutes post administration
Ratings of empathic concern will be calculated for each participant by deriving a composite from self-report ratings of sympathy and compassion. Using a mixed 2 (friend, stranger) x 2 (vasopressin, placebo) factorial design, comparisons of these ratings will then be made for those in the vasopressin vs. placebo groups. Main effects of drug condition (vasopressin, placebo) as well as the interaction between drug condition and target (friend, stranger) will be analyzed at a significance level of p<.05.
Between 40-115 minutes post administration
Altruism and punishment as measured by number of points given to excluders and those excluded
Time Frame: Between 40-115 minutes post administration
Ratings of altruism and punishment will be calculated by examining how many point (1-10) participants decide to allocate towards the friend-excluder, stranger-excluder, excluded friend, and excluded stranger after watching each social exclusion game. Using a mixed 2 (friend, stranger) x 2 (vasopressin, placebo) factorial design, comparisons of these ratings will then be made for those in the vasopressin vs. placebo groups. Main effects of drug condition (vasopressin, placebo) and target (friend, stranger), as well as an interaction between drug condition and target will be analyzed at a significance level of p<.05.
Between 40-115 minutes post administration
Changes in neural brain activity, as observed by fMRI, while attempting to detect deception
Time Frame: Between 40-115 minutes post administration
Whole brain and region of interest (ROI) regression analysis will be used to compare the neural activity of participants in the vasopressin/placebo groups. A design matrix will be created for each participant, modeling activity that is greater during the deception detection task versus a control task. A first-level analysis will compare deception-detection>control for each participant. A second-level group analysis will compare this first-level contrast between the vasopressin and placebo groups.
Between 40-115 minutes post administration
Accuracy of deception detection as measured by self-report
Time Frame: Between 40-115 minutes post administration
The investigators will compare the percentage of correct deception detection trials for participants in the vasopressin group to those in the placebo group by running a two-tailed t-test with a statistical cutoff of p<.05 to determine significance.
Between 40-115 minutes post administration
Changes in neural brain activity, as observed by fMRI, when viewing images of primary caregivers versus strangers
Time Frame: Between 40-115 minutes post administration
Whole brain and region of interest (ROI) regression analysis will be used to compare the neural activity of participants in the vasopressin/placebo groups. A design matrix will be created for each participant, modeling activity that is greater while viewing photo stimuli of ones primary caregivers versus viewing photo stimuli of matched strangers. A first-level analysis will compare primary-caregiver-viewing>stranger-viewing for each participant. A second-level group analysis will compare this first-level contrast between the vasopressin and placebo groups.
Between 40-115 minutes post administration
Changes in brain neural activity, observed by fMRI, in response to a reading comprehension task
Time Frame: Between 40-90 minutes post administration
Whole brain and region of interest (ROI) regression analysis will be used to compare the neural activity of participants in the tutor/memorizer and vasopressin/placebo groups. A design matrix will be created for each participant, modeling activity that is greater during reading comprehension compared with the grammar control passage. First level analyses will compare the response during the reading comprehension passages relative to the grammar control passages. Second level group analyses will compare the first level contrasts between the tutor vs. memorizer groups as well as the vasopressin vs. placebo groups. In regression analyses the investigators will enter each participant's comprehension test score in the tutor and then memorizer condition as a regressor in a whole-brain and ROI analysis to determine which brain regions were more active during the encoding of the reading comprehension passage compared to the grammar control passage.
Between 40-90 minutes post administration
Performance on a memory test of reading comprehension as measured by percentage of questions answered correctly
Time Frame: Between 40-90 minutes post administration
Accuracy will be calculated for each participant by dividing the number of correct responses by the total number of questions. The investigators will then conduct a between-subjects 2x2 ANOVA on the accuracy scores for the four groups of interest (i.e., vasopressin-tutor, vasopressin-memorizer, placebo-tutor, placebo-memorizer). A significance level of p<.05 will be used to determine whether there are significant differences between the groups. The investigators will examine whether there is a main effect of either factor (vasopressin vs. placebo, tutor vs. memorize) as well as an interaction between the factors of interest.
Between 40-90 minutes post administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew D Lieberman, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Social Psychology

Clinical Trials on Intranasal vasopressin

3
Subscribe