Cervical Epidural Pressure Measurement

November 5, 2009 updated by: Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Cervical Epidural Pressure Measurement: Comparison in the Prone and Sitting Positions

Cervical epidural steroid injections

  • The hanging drop (HD) technique is commonly used for identifying the cervical epidural space.
  • The hanging drop (HD) technique is using the negative pressure in the epidural space.
  • The subject of debate whether the epidural space exhibits negative pressure.
  • In a previous study, EP might be influenced by body position
  • No report or peer-reviewed literature to demonstrate the cervical epidural pressure (CEP) now.

The hypothesis of this study

  • There is a difference in the cervical epidural pressure between in the prone and sitting positions
  • To evaluate this hypothesis, CEPs in the prone and sitting groups were measured and compared in the two groups.
  • Using a closed pressure measurement system
  • Under fluoroscopic guidance.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs)

  • For the conservative management of head, neck, and upper extremity pain
  • Important to identify the epidural space for minimizing the chance of a dural puncture injection
  • Dural puncture injection makes CESIs prone to rare but catastrophic complication like permanent spinal cord injury

The hanging drop (HD) technique

  • Commonly used for identifying the cervical epidural space
  • Using the negative pressure in the epidural space
  • The subject of debate whether the epidural space exhibits negative pressure

In previous studies using a closed pressure measurement systems

  • The epidural pressure (EP) was commonly positive at the thoracic level in the lateral decubitus position.
  • EP was consistently negative only in the sitting position.
  • EP might be influenced by body position.
  • The patient should be sitting for using the HD technique.

No report or peer-reviewed literature to demonstrate the cervical epidural pressure (CEP) now.

The hypothesis of this study

  • There is a difference in the cervical epidural pressure between in the prone and sitting positions
  • To evaluate this hypothesis, CEPs in the prone and sitting groups were measured and compared in the two groups.
  • Using a closed pressure measurement system
  • Under fluoroscopic guidance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kyonggi-do
      • Kumi, Kyonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • cervical radicular pain caused by herniated nucleus pulpous and spinal stenosis
  • other conditions including herpes zoster-associated pain and sprain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindications for CESIs, such as coagulopathy, patient refusal or infection at the proposed insertion site
  • previous cervical spinal surgery
  • pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: prone position
  • After aseptic preparation and skin infiltration with 1% lidocaine
  • 20-gauge Tuohy needle (Tae-Chang Industrial Co., Kongju, Korea) was inserted in the midline at the C6 - C7 level
  • identification of the epidural space confirmed by injection of contrast medium under fluoroscope
  • injection of 5 mL of solution containing 10 mg of triamcinolone acetonide suspension and 1.5 mL of 0.75% levobupivacaine hydrochloride, and 3.5 mL of physiologic saline (0.9% NaCl).
  • Post-procedure, patients were observed for any adverse effects and followed with a neurological examination
Other Names:
  • cervical interlaminar epidural injection
  • The stylet within the Tuohy needle is removed when the needle was placed in C6-7 ligamentum flavum under fluoroscopic true lateral view.
  • Identification of the epidural space and measurement of EP was performed with a closed measurement system.
Other Names:
  • a closed pressure measurement system
Active Comparator: sitting position
  • After aseptic preparation and skin infiltration with 1% lidocaine
  • 20-gauge Tuohy needle (Tae-Chang Industrial Co., Kongju, Korea) was inserted in the midline at the C6 - C7 level
  • identification of the epidural space confirmed by injection of contrast medium under fluoroscope
  • injection of 5 mL of solution containing 10 mg of triamcinolone acetonide suspension and 1.5 mL of 0.75% levobupivacaine hydrochloride, and 3.5 mL of physiologic saline (0.9% NaCl).
  • Post-procedure, patients were observed for any adverse effects and followed with a neurological examination
Other Names:
  • cervical interlaminar epidural injection
  • The stylet within the Tuohy needle is removed when the needle was placed in C6-7 ligamentum flavum under fluoroscopic true lateral view.
  • Identification of the epidural space and measurement of EP was performed with a closed measurement system.
Other Names:
  • a closed pressure measurement system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
cervical epidural pressure
Time Frame: on interventional procedure (cervical epidural steroid injetion)
on interventional procedure (cervical epidural steroid injetion)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the angle of the neck flexion
Time Frame: on interventional procedure (cervical epidural steroid injection)
on interventional procedure (cervical epidural steroid injection)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeeyoun Moon, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2009

Last Verified

November 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • snu23802

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on cervical epidural steroid injection

3
Subscribe