Enhancing Guided Bone Regeneration by Modifying a Resorbable Membrane

October 13, 2016 updated by: Stony Brook University

Enhanced Guided Bone Regeneration in Localized Osseous Alveolar Defects by Using a Novel Perforated Resorbable Barrier Membrane

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures have significantly evolved over the last 20 years. Significant advances have been made with various barrier membranes with or without the use of bone grafts and other materials. Some of the main limitations of non-resorbable barriers included cytotoxicity and need for removal, which can adversely affect the regenerated bone volume. Similar GBR success has been documented extensively with cell occlusive resorbable barriers membranes. Recently, the investigators demonstrated supracrestal bone regeneration in guided tissue regeneration procedures in humans with the use of novel perforated barrier membrane (MPM). The perforation allows mesenchymal stem cells and other progenitor cells present in the gingival tissues to migrate into the osseous defect and contribute to the osseous regeneration potential.

The objective of this study is to investigate the GBR potential of MPM in alveolar ridge defects, relative to a similar occlusive barrier. Ten non-smoking patients that need localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to implant placement will be included into the study. Patients will be divided into two groups, as follows: occlusive bovine collagen membrane (OM control group, 5 patients) and modified bovine perforated collagen membrane (MPM test group, 5 patients). All sites will be grafted with mineralized cortical bone allograft and when needed cortical bone pins will be use for site stability. A Cone Bean (CT) will be obtained prior to surgery and 6-8 months post treatment from which volumetric width changes will be quantify. A bone biopsy will be obtained at the time of implant placement (~6-8 months) to determine residual graft particles and new bone formation. Dimensional width changes will be assess at 6-8 months during re-entry for implant placement. Soft tissue healing will be assessed at 2, 4, 8, 16 weeks and 6 months.

This study can potentially impact current bone augmentation techniques and may lead to the modification of existing commercial membranes that will enhance site development prior to implant placement. The contribution of progenitor cells to the osseous defect might lead to greater bone formation and possible faster wound healing.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Recruiting
        • School of Dental Medicine of Stony Brook University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at the augmentation site, the alveolar ridge must be deficient in a buccolingual dimension (< 5.5 mm): Class 1 Seibert defects.
  • alveolar ridges to be augmented must have a minimum of 4 mm of keratinized gingiva extending the length of the planned augmentation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • general contraindications to implant surgery
  • subjected to irradiation, chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy over the past 5 years
  • poor oral hygiene and motivation
  • uncontrolled diabetes
  • pregnant or lactating
  • substance abusers
  • current smokers
  • psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
  • acute infection in the area intended for implant placement
  • positive to HIV and hepatitis B and C
  • affected by autoimmune diseases such as arthritis rheumatoid, systemic lupus erythematosus, sclerodermia, Sjo ̈gren syndrome and dermatomyositis polymyositis
  • treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates
  • subjected previously to reconstructive procedures of the posterior mandible and
  • under chronic treatment with steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Occlusive Membrane (OM)
Five patients will be randomly assigned to the OM group.
Biomend Extend is a resorbable collagen membrane used for guided tissue and bone regeneration.
Experimental: Modified Perforated Membrane (MPM)
Five patients will be randomly assigned to the MPM group.
Biomend Extend is a resorbable collagen membrane used for guided tissue and bone regeneration. This membrane will be perforated to allow the passage of cells and growth factors that can potentially enhanced bone augmentation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical horizontal bone augmentation results through direct measurement.
Time Frame: at 6 months post treatment
at 6 months post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Volumetric measurements with CBCT
Time Frame: pre- and 6 months post treatment
pre- and 6 months post treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
De novo bone formation, and residual graft particles quantification with histomorphometric analysis
Time Frame: at 6 months post treatment
at 6 months post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • StonyBrookU

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

Clinical Trials on BioMend Extend

3
Subscribe