The Effect of Wheat Germ on Gastrointestinal Discomfort, Blood Cholesterol and Postprandial Glycaemic Response

November 5, 2019 updated by: Universidade do Porto

The Effect of Wheat Germ on Gastrointestinal Discomfort, Blood Cholesterol and Postprandial Glycaemic Response in Healthy Volunteers

Wheat germ is a by-product of the wheat-milling industry with high nutritional value and therefore could be used as a raw source for the preparation of food products such as bread, cookies, muffins, etc.

The aim of this study is to assess the effects of ingesting wheat breads supplemented with wheat germ on gastrointestinal discomfort, blood cholesterol and postprandial glycaemic response in healthy human volunteers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a crossover, double blinded, placebo controlled randomized trial. The study will compare the effect of consumption of wheat breads with or without wheat germ on healthy individuals, during 2 intake periods of 4 weeks each and 5 weeks washout before crossover.

The study will focus on the effects of wheat breads supplemented with wheat germ on gastrointestinal discomfort, blood cholesterol and postprandial glycaemic response in healthy human volunteers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lisbon, Portugal
        • PtCRIN
      • Porto, Portugal, 4200-450
        • CINTESIS - Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult men or women
  • Age 18 - 60 years
  • Healthy volunteers free of chronic diseases with relevant effect on the gastrointestinal system or on visceral motility
  • Without a diagnosis of any digestive disease including functional bowel disorders such as IBS
  • Non-diabetic, no gastric bypass surgery
  • Have a fasting plasma glucose (finger-stick) <100 mg/dl (<5.5 mmol/L)
  • Non-smoker
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject under prescription for medication for digestive symptoms such as anti-spasmodic, laxatives and anti-diarrheic drugs or other digestive auxiliaries
  • Relevant history, presence of any medical disorder or intake of medication / dietary supplements, potentially interfering with this trial at screening
  • Subjects with stool frequency of ≤ 1 stool every 7 days
  • Subjects not willing to avoid pre- and probiotics for the duration of the study
  • Intake of antibiotics in the last 4 weeks and laxatives in the last 2 weeks
  • Current use of medication for lowering blood cholesterol or glucose
  • Change of dietary habits within the 4 weeks prior to screening (for instance start of a diet high in fibres)
  • Pregnant subject or subject planning to become pregnant during the study; breast-feeding subject
  • Subjects with history of drug, alcohol or other substances abuse, or other factors limiting their ability to co-operate during the study
  • Participants anticipating a change in their lifestyle or physical activity levels since this may also influence the results
  • Known food intolerance or allergy
  • Subject involved in any clinical or food study within the preceding month

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: wheat bread with wheat germ
wheat bread with wheat germ supplementation
Placebo Comparator: wheat bread without wheat germ
wheat bread without wheat germ supplementation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in mean Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) score from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 7, 9, 11 and 13
Time Frame: at the end of week 0 (after 2-week run-in period), at the end of weeks 2 and 4 (during 4-week intake period), at the end of weeks 7 and 9 (during 5-week washout period), at the end of weeks 11 and 13 (during 4-week intake period after crossover)
A validated PAC-SYM questionnaire will be used. PAC-SYM is a 12-item, self-administered questionnaire used to measure severity of symptoms over the past 2 weeks in patients with constipation. The PAC-SYM questionnaire has been demonstrated and documented to have internal consistency, reproducibility, validity, sensitivity, and responsiveness. PAC-SYM items are rated on a 5-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe) and grouped into three subscales related to abdominal symptoms (bloating, discomfort, pain, and cramps), stool symptoms (incomplete bowel movement, false alarm, straining, too hard, and too small), and rectal symptoms (painful bowel movement, burning, and bleeding or tearing). The total score and subscale scores are computed by taking the mean of item responses (score range 0-4). A reduction in score reflects an improvement in symptoms. Cultural adaptation and linguistic validation of the PAC-SYM for Portugal was performed by Mapi Research.
at the end of week 0 (after 2-week run-in period), at the end of weeks 2 and 4 (during 4-week intake period), at the end of weeks 7 and 9 (during 5-week washout period), at the end of weeks 11 and 13 (during 4-week intake period after crossover)
Changes in fasting serum total cholesterol from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4
Time Frame: at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
Changes in fasting serum triglycerides from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4
Time Frame: at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
Changes in fasting serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4
Time Frame: at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
Changes in fasting serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4
Time Frame: at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
Changes in fasting serum C-reactive protein from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4
Time Frame: at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
Changes in capillary blood glucose from baseline to visit 2 and 4
Time Frame: 0, 30, 60 and 120 minutes post-meal: at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
0, 30, 60 and 120 minutes post-meal: at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in mean Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 7, 9, 11 and 13
Time Frame: at the end of week 0 (after 2-week run-in period), at the end of weeks 2 and 4 (during 4-week intake period), at the end of weeks 7 and 9 (during 5-week washout period), at the end of weeks 11 and 13 (during 4-week intake period after crossover)
A validated PAC-QOL questionnaire will be used. PAC-QOL questionnaire is a 28-item self-administered questionnaire that is being used to measure health-related quality of life (over the past 2 weeks) in patients with chronic constipation. The 28 items are grouped into four subscales: physical discomfort, psychosocial discomfort, worries and concerns, and satisfaction. Previous studies have shown that PAC-QOL is internally consistent, reproducible, valid and responsive to improvements in chronic constipation over time. Cultural adaptation and linguistic validation of the PAC-QOL for Portugal was performed by Mapi Research Trust.
at the end of week 0 (after 2-week run-in period), at the end of weeks 2 and 4 (during 4-week intake period), at the end of weeks 7 and 9 (during 5-week washout period), at the end of weeks 11 and 13 (during 4-week intake period after crossover)
Changes in intestinal microbiota from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4
Time Frame: at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period), and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period), and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
Changes in mean daily abdominal discomfort score from baseline to weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13
Time Frame: daily during run-in period (weeks -1 and 0), intake period (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13), and washout period (weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
A number scale will be used to measure the average intensity (abdominal discomfort and bloating), over the previous 24 hours, on a 5-point scale from 0 (absence of symptom) to 4 (very severe). Will be assessed through daily records.
daily during run-in period (weeks -1 and 0), intake period (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13), and washout period (weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
Changes in stool consistency from baseline to weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13
Time Frame: at days with stool during run-in period (weeks -1 and 0), intake period (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13), and washout period ( weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
The Bristol stool scale will be used to measure the stool consistency. Will be assessed through daily records.
at days with stool during run-in period (weeks -1 and 0), intake period (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13), and washout period ( weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
Changes in stool frequency from baseline to weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13
Time Frame: at days with stool during run-in period (weeks -1 and 0), intake period (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13), and washout period ( weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
Will be assessed through daily records.
at days with stool during run-in period (weeks -1 and 0), intake period (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13), and washout period ( weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
Changes in fasting plasma insulin from baseline to visit 2 and 4
Time Frame: at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
Changes in mean Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score from baseline to weeks 4, 9 and 13
Time Frame: at the end of week 0 (after 2-week run-in period), at the end of week 4 (after 4-week intake period), at the end of week 9 (after 5-week washout period), and at the end of week 13 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
A validated Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) self-administered questionnaire with 13-item will be used to measure perceived stress of respondents during the last month (Portuguese version keeps 13 of the 14 original items). The PSS questionnaire has been demonstrated to have internal consistency, reproducibility, validity, and sensitivity. Cultural adaptation and linguistic validation of the PSS for Portugal was implemented by Pais-Ribeiro & Marques (2009).
at the end of week 0 (after 2-week run-in period), at the end of week 4 (after 4-week intake period), at the end of week 9 (after 5-week washout period), and at the end of week 13 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: at visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period), and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)
Registration of any adverse events.
at visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period), and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Conceição Calhau, PhD, CINTESIS, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Volunteers

Clinical Trials on wheat bread with wheat germ

3
Subscribe