Diode Laser for Harvesting Gingival Graft

May 12, 2015 updated by: Onur Ozcelik, Cukurova University

Diode Laser For Harvesting Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in The Treatment of Gingival Recession Defects: A Novel Approach to Limit Morbidity

Aims: The aim of present randomized controlled clinical study was to evaluate whether the additional use of diode laser would facilitate the donor surgery, improve the palatal wound healing and reduce post-operative morbidity after the coronally advanced flap (CAF) with connective tissue (CTG) grafts.

Methods: Fifty-two patients with isolated recessions were treated. The CTG resulted from the de-epithelialization of a free gingival graft (FGG) with blade (control group) or diode laser (DL) (test group). The DL was used to de-epithelialize the outer part of the FGG and photo-biostimulate the palatal wound area. Post-operative morbidity was evaluated by using Oral health related Quality of life (QoL), smile related QoL and visual analogue scale-discomfort (VAS). Root coverage outcomes were also evaluated 6 months after operation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The procedure of connective tissue harvesting from the palate is often characterized by the challenge of obtaining the largest volume of tissue possible on one side while minimizing post-operative pain and reducing the risk of complications on the other.The present clinical study evaluated whether the additional use of diode laser would facilitate the donor surgery, improve the palatal wound healing and reduce post-operative morbidity after the bilaminar periodontal plastic surgery procedure for the treatment of isolated single gingival recession defects with no loss of interdental clinical attachment.

In the test sites, an aluminum, gallium, and arsenide diode laser (wavelength 810 nm and power of 1W) was applied in continuous mode. In the control group,a free (epithelialized) gingival graft was harvested by two horizontal and two vertical incisions defining the area. The post operative course of the patients were evaluated by visual analogical scale and the oral health impact profile

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Adana, Turkey, 01330
        • Cukurova University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 38 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of identifiable buccal cemento-enamel junction;
  • Presence of a step ≤ 1mm at the cemento-enamel junction level
  • No contraindications for periodontal surgery and no periodontal surgery on the involved sites
  • Full-mouth plaque score of <10%; full-mouth bleeding score of <15%
  • No occlusal interferences.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of periodontitis or abscess formation
  • Presence of systemic disease
  • Smokers
  • Pregnant patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diode laser group
In the test sites, an aluminum, gallium, and arsenide diode laser (wavelength 810 nm and power of 1W) was applied in continuous mode.
the laser tip was used to remove all visible epithelium in the outer side of the defined graft area. The treatment was performed from the coronal to the apical aspect in parallel paths, and care was taken to avoid any laser contact to the palatal bone and periosteum by aiming the laser beam at a 450 angle to the palatal soft-tissue. The resultant layer on the surface was totally removed with knife and moist gauze. Then, the graft was harvested from the de-epithelized area with a 15c blade.
Active Comparator: Scalpel control group
The surgical technique used in the control group was a FGG harvested by two horizontal and two vertical incisions by scalpel defining the area to be harvested .
In the control group tissue was obtained by two horizontal and two vertical incisions defining the area to be harvested. The blade was oriented perpendicular to the bone along the coronal horizontal incision and once an adequate soft tissue thickness was obtained; it was rotated in order to be parallel to the superficial surface. The thickness of the graft was maintained uniform while proceeding apically with the blade until the FGG was harvested. The palatal wound was protected with equine-derived collagen maintained by compressive sling 5-0 sutures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Oral health related quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Complete root coverage
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Smile related quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Post-operative Discomfort on the Visual Analog scale
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Onur Ozcelik, PhD, Cukurova University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on diode laser group

3
Subscribe