Active Clearance Technology (ACT) II German Multicenter Trial

April 28, 2017 updated by: Prof. Dr. Theodor Fischlein

The Active Clearance Technology (ACT) II German Multicenter Trial

Postoperative bleeding is a common consequence after heart surgery which can significantly impact outcomes and costs [Wynne R, Christensen MC, Dixon B]. When bleeding occurs, reliable postoperative blood evacuation of the pleural, mediastinal and pericardial spaces with chest tubes is imperative to facilitate pulmonary re-expansion and mediastinal decompression as the patient recovers. When postoperative blood evacuation is inadequate, retained blood complications can result (herein described as the Retained Blood Complications (RBC). RBC is the presence of post-operative pericardial and/or pleural fluid or blood that is diagnosed and may necessitate drainage in the acute or sub-acute setting. The need for treatment and interventions for these conditions represents an impediment to patient recovery and involves both resource and economic consumption for a heart program and the healthcare system at large.

Clinically, Retained Blood Complications (RBC) can be recognized acutely or subacutely. When it presents acutely, it is usually fresh thrombus around the heart or lungs presenting as tamponade or hemothorax. When it presents subacutely, it results in bloody pleural or pericardial effusions. These effusions are often driven by the breakdown of remaining thrombus. Once RBC occurs, subsequent procedures may be needed to remedy it.

A recent review of the literature indicated that additional procedures for RBC are demonstrated in approximately 15% to 20% of patients after heart surgery. In a prospectively collected United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2010, RBC could be demonstrated in 17% of patients. In this analysis, mortality was doubled from 4% to 8%, length of stay was increased by 5 days, and average costs were 55% higher. Patients with RBC, therefore, represent an increased at risk population for complications and costs.

Postoperative obstruction of conventional chest tubes with blood and other fibrinous material in the setting of postoperative bleeding contributes to RBC. (Shalli) In a recent study of postoperative cardiac surgery patients at the Cleveland Clinic, 36% of patients were found to have evidence of chest tube obstruction . Active Clearance with PleuraFlow has been shown to prevent chest tube clogging, and reduce RBC.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Complications from RBS are defined as those requiring re-operation or surgical interventions to evacuate blood, blood clot, bloody fluid, and air accumulation within the operative site after closure of the surgical wound. This is a prospective multicenter observational post-market study with a retrospective component. The study is open to up to five (5) German sites enrolling a consecutive cohort of cardiac surgery patients.

There are two conditions for participation in this registry. First, sites are required to enter into the study database anonymized matched historical data elements from a cohort of cardiac surgery patients done over the preceding 12 to 24-month period (Phase 0). These retrospective data elements will be used as baseline information for the purpose of comparative analyses with the prospective data sets. Second, sites that have not been using the PleuraFlow System before enrolling patients to this study are required to participate in a roll-in phase (Phase 1). The purposes of the roll-in phase are to allow the users at participating sites to familiarize themselves with the product use and with ACT, to implement Clinical Use Protocols provided by ClearFlow, Inc. to all commercial users as part of product training, and to demonstrate consistency and compliance with the clinical use protocols.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1113

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects older than 18 years who received a PleuraFlow System following heart surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Male or Female subjects 18 years or older who received a PleuraFlow System following heart surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any condition deemed inappropriate for inclusion by the investigators
  2. Infants, children and adolescents under the age of 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent reduction in the rate of interventions to treat Retained Blood Syndrome (RBS)
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 days

RBS is a composite endpoint defined as an intervention to treat one or more of the following conditions:

-Re-exploration for bleeding, tamponade or washout of retained bloo

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Theodor Fischlein, Prof., Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum, Nuremberg, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Surgery

Clinical Trials on Blood drainage post cardiac surgery using PleuraFlow System

3
Subscribe