- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02540213
Observational Study of MIRCERA in Users of Self-Application and Multidose Systems
November 18, 2015 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
This non-interventional, observational study investigates the efficiency, safety and acceptance of MIRCERA in participants, who received erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) using a self-application system.
For each participant, the investigator documents 9 months of treatment with Mircera with respect to efficacy, safety and acceptance.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
240
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Daun, Germany, 54550
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Participants with chronic kidney disease who received ESA therapy or multidose system before they changed to MIRCERA
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Anemia caused by CKD only
- Life expectancy of more than (>) 9 months in the judgment of the attending physician
- Ferritin >200 micrograms per liter (mcg/L) in accordance with the relevant guidelines
- The time point of changing to Mircera was only 3 months ago at the longest
Exclusion Criteria:
N/A
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
MIRCERA Ready-To-Use-Syringe
Participants will use MIRCERA ready-to-use-syringes (methoxy polyethylene glycol epoetin beta 0.6 micrograms per kilogram [mcg/kg]) every 2 weeks (q2w) up to 9 months
|
Methoxy polyethylene glycol epoetin beta (0.6 mcg/kg q2w) will be administered using MIRCERA ready-to-use-syringes up to 9 months.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants Satisfied With Previous Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participant satisfaction was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non- satisfying).
Percentage of participants who were satisfied (with a rating of 1 [satisfying]) with previous ESA treatment was reported.
For participants who had multiple previous ESA treatments, the latest applied ESA before start of Mircera therapy was considered.
|
Baseline
|
Percentage of Participants Satisfied With the MIRCERA Treatment, Application, Preparation, Storage, and Disposal at Month 1
Time Frame: Month 1
|
Participant satisfaction was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non-satisfying).
Percentage of participants who were satisfied (with a rating of 1 [satisfying]) was reported for each of the MIRCERA parameters.
|
Month 1
|
Percentage of Participants Satisfied With the MIRCERA Treatment, Application, Preparation, Storage, and Disposal at Month 2
Time Frame: Month 2
|
Participant satisfaction was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non-satisfying).
Percentage of participants who were satisfied (with a rating of 1 [satisfying]) was reported for each of the MIRCERA parameters.
|
Month 2
|
Percentage of Participants Satisfied With the MIRCERA Treatment, Application, Preparation, Storage, and Disposal at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3
|
Participant satisfaction was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non-satisfying).
Percentage of participants who were satisfied (with a rating of 1 [satisfying]) was reported for each of the MIRCERA parameters.
|
Month 3
|
Percentage of Participants Satisfied With the MIRCERA Treatment, Application, Preparation, Storage, and Disposal at Month 4
Time Frame: Month 4
|
Participant satisfaction was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non-satisfying).
Percentage of participants who were satisfied (with a rating of 1 [satisfying]) was reported for each of the MIRCERA parameters.
|
Month 4
|
Percentage of Participants Satisfied With the MIRCERA Treatment, Application, Preparation, Storage, and Disposal at Month 5
Time Frame: Month 5
|
Participant satisfaction was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non-satisfying).
Percentage of participants who were satisfied (with a rating of 1 [satisfying]) was reported for each of the MIRCERA parameters.
|
Month 5
|
Percentage of Participants Satisfied With the MIRCERA Treatment, Application, Preparation, Storage, and Disposal at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Participant satisfaction was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non-satisfying).
Percentage of participants who were satisfied (with a rating of 1 [satisfying]) was reported for each of the MIRCERA parameters.
|
Month 6
|
Percentage of Participants Satisfied With the MIRCERA Treatment, Application, Preparation, Storage, and Disposal at Month 7
Time Frame: Month 7
|
Participant satisfaction was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non-satisfying).
Percentage of participants who were satisfied (with a rating of 1 [satisfying]) was reported for each of the MIRCERA parameters.
|
Month 7
|
Percentage of Participants Satisfied With the MIRCERA Treatment, Application, Preparation, Storage, and Disposal at Month 8
Time Frame: Month 8
|
Participant satisfaction was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non-satisfying).
Percentage of participants who were satisfied (with a rating of 1 [satisfying]) was reported for each of the MIRCERA parameters.
|
Month 8
|
Percentage of Participants Satisfied With the MIRCERA Treatment, Application, Preparation, Storage, and Disposal at Month 9
Time Frame: Month 9
|
Participant satisfaction was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non-satisfying).
Percentage of participants who were satisfied (with a rating of 1 [satisfying]) was reported for each of the MIRCERA parameters.
|
Month 9
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Sensation Using Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 1-9
|
Pain sensation was reported by participants using a visual scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (strong pain).
Pain sensation at baseline referred to pain sensation regarding previous ESA.
Change of pain sensation = pain sensation regarding previous ESA (baseline)' minus 'pain sensation regarding MIRCERA (Month 1-9).
Positive numbers indicate less pain sensation during MIRCERA application.
|
Baseline, Months 1-9
|
Percentage of Participants Who Reported Easement of Therapy With MIRCERA
Time Frame: 9 months
|
9 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Continued Treatment After End of Study
Time Frame: End of observation period (Month 9)
|
End of observation period (Month 9)
|
|
Average Monthly Dose of MIRCERA
Time Frame: 9 months
|
9 months
|
|
Number of MIRCERA Dose Adaptations
Time Frame: 9 months
|
9 months
|
|
Mean Monthly Administrations of MIRCERA
Time Frame: 9 months
|
9 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Pre-Post Shift for Participant Satisfaction With Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
|
Participant satisfaction with treatment was measured using 3 categories (1=satisfying, 2=undecided, 3=non-satisfying).
Participant pre-post comparison of satisfaction rating was done by considering the difference of baseline rating (satisfaction rating for previous ESA) and rating at respective visit (satisfaction rating for MIRCERA).
Thus, possible results were -2, -1, 0, 1, and 2, with positive values indicating a greater satisfaction with MIRCERA than with the previous ESA (acceptance and preference of MIRCERA over previous ESA).
Percentage of participants with each possible result category (-2, -1, 0, 1, 2) is reported at each visit.
|
Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hb) Concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
|
Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2010
Study Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 1, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
September 3, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
December 22, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 18, 2015
Last Verified
November 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ML21387
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Renal Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease
-
Helwan UniversityCompletedAnemia of Chronic Kidney Disease | Chronic Renal Failure | Chronic Renal Failure AnemiaEgypt
-
Xiamen Amoytop Biotech Co., Ltd.First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityCompletedRenal Anemia of Chronic Kidney DiseaseChina
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedRenal Anemia of Chronic Kidney DiseaseCroatia
-
Medical University of ViennaCompletedAnemia of Chronic Kidney DiseaseAustria
-
Dong-A ST Co., Ltd.UnknownAnemia of Chronic Kidney DiseaseTurkey
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalCompletedAnemia of Chronic Kidney Disease
-
Rufaida MazahirCompletedAnemia of Chronic Kidney DiseaseIndia
-
Bio Sidus SAUnknownAnemia of Chronic Kidney DiseaseArgentina, Paraguay
-
Shenzhen Second People's HospitalRecruiting
Clinical Trials on MIRCERA
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompleted
-
Samsung Medical CenterUnknown
-
Akebia TherapeuticsCompletedAnemia Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)United States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompleted
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompleted
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedKidney Disease, ChronicKorea, Republic of
-
PT Kalbe Genexine BiologicsNovotech (Australia) Pty LimitedCompletedAnaemia Associated With Chronic Kidney DiseaseTaiwan, Australia, Korea, Republic of, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedRenal Insufficiency, Chronic | AnemiaUnited States, Spain, France, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Poland
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedAnemiaUnited States, Canada, United Kingdom, Mexico, Poland
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompleted