An Observational Study to Describe the Adherence to the SEOM Algorithm for the Treatment of Hyponatraemia in Spain (ALGA)

November 6, 2017 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Europe Ltd

An Observational, Retrospective Study to Describe the Extent of Adherence to the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology Algorithm for the Treatment of Hyponatraemia Secondary to SIADH in Oncology Patients in Spain (ALGA)

In 2014, the Spanish Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) algorithm for the treatment of hyponatraemia secondary to to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) in oncology patients was developed. Since it is hypothesised that the adherence to the SEOM algorithm is not 100%, the current retrospective non-interventional study will investigate the perceived and actual adherence of participating centres to the SEOM algorithm and its impact on patient outcomes

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Castelló de la Plana, Spain
      • Madrid, Spain
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain
      • Sevilla, Spain

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Eligible patients are oncology patients ≥ 18 years old who had been diagnosed with at least one occurrence of hyponatraemia secondary to the SIADH and who had been managed ein one of the Spanish centres who have implemented the SEOM algorithm.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of patient informed consent unless a) not required by local regulations, b) it would represent a non-reasonable effort or c) if the source patient is deceased or untraceable.
  • Female and/or male oncology patients aged 18 years and over
  • Patients who have experienced at least one occurrence of hyponatraemia secondary to the SIADH.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A patient cannot take part in this study if participating in any clinical study in which the medicinal product aims to treat the causes or symptoms of hyponatraemia at the time of the hyponatraemia episode being documented in the current study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Managed According to the SEOM Algorithm (as a Result Adherence to the Algorithm Will be the % of These Patients Among the Total Number of Patients)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days (follow-up will stop after a maximum of 6 weeks)
Adherence to the algorithm will be evaluated using a pre-defined decision tree that will be provided in the electronic case report form (eCRF) and will be completed by the investigator
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days (follow-up will stop after a maximum of 6 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Sodium Level Improvement for Patients Who Were and Were Not Treated in Adherence With the SEOM Algorithm (Days)
Time Frame: Longitudinal (up to discharge or a maximum of 6 weeks after onset of hyponatremia episode)
Improvement is defined as a change in the baseline sodium level category (mild, moderate or severe) from a worse category to a better category or eunatraemia. Note that the time to improvement of sodium levels was defined as the first date/time of improvement of sodium levels - date/time of collection of serum sodium levels at baseline (for patients where there was an improvement in sodium levels) or as the final date/time of collection of serum sodium levels - date/time of collection of serum sodium levels at baseline (for patients that did not achieve an improvement in sodium levels [censored patients]).
Longitudinal (up to discharge or a maximum of 6 weeks after onset of hyponatremia episode)
Time to Initiation or Re-initiation of Chemotherapy (Since the Start of the Hyponatraemia Episode) in Patients Candidate for Chemotherapy Who Were and Were Not Treated in Adherence With the SEOM Algorithm.
Time Frame: Longitudinal (up to discharge or a maximum of 6 weeks after onset of hyponatremia episode)
Longitudinal (up to discharge or a maximum of 6 weeks after onset of hyponatremia episode)
Length of Hospitalisation (Measured From the Start of the Hyponatraemia Episode to Discharge) for Patients Who Were and Were Not Treated in Adherence With the Algorithm
Time Frame: Longitudinal (up to discharge or a maximum of 6 weeks after onset of hyponatremia episode)
Longitudinal (up to discharge or a maximum of 6 weeks after onset of hyponatremia episode)
Time to Sodium Level Improvement for Patients Who Were and Were Not Treated in Adherence With the SEOM Algorithm (Hours)
Time Frame: Longitudinal (up to discharge or a maximum of 6 weeks after onset of hyponatremia episode)
Improvement is defined as a change in the baseline sodium level category (mild, moderate or severe) from a worse category to a better category or eunatraemia. Note that the time to improvement of sodium levels was defined as the first date/time of improvement of sodium levels - date/time of collection of serum sodium levels at baseline (for patients where there was an improvement in sodium levels) or as the final date/time of collection of serum sodium levels - date/time of collection of serum sodium levels at baseline (for patients that did not achieve an improvement in sodium levels [censored patients]).
Longitudinal (up to discharge or a maximum of 6 weeks after onset of hyponatremia episode)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyponatremia

3
Subscribe