Phantom Limb Pain: Efficacy of Non-invasive Sensory Feedback Through the Prosthesis (EPIONE)
Amputation of a limb may result from trauma or surgical intervention. The amputation traumatically alters the body image, but often leaves sensations that refer to the missing body part. In 50-80% amputees, neuropathic pain develops, also called phantom limb pain (PLP). Both peripheral and central nervous system factors have been implicated as determinants of PLP. Also, PLP may be triggered by physical (changes in the weather) and psychological factors (emotional stress). Recent evidence suggests that PLP may be intricately related to neuroplastic changes in the cortex, and that these changes may modulated by providing sensory input to the stump or amputation zone.
A non-invasive clinical trial will test the effectiveness of non-invasive pressure sensory feedback build into a hand prosthesis to alleviate phantom limb pain.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
During the pre-screen phase the investigators will assess whether the patient experiences referred phantom limb sensations or pain. In the case that the patient does experience referred sensations on the stump the investigators will map the areas where the sensation occurs on the stump and utilize this for placement of the surface actuators. In the opposite case, actuators will instead be placed in a matrix structure at the residual limb.
As a first step towards applying mechanical stimulation, the sensation thresholds (the level of stimulation where the subject first reports a sensation) have to be determined. The outcome of this procedure is a minimum of stimulation amplitude that can be applied for each stimulation site.
A first choice would be to use the referred map to place actuators. However, amputees have different phantom maps and also the number of areas varies.
A therapy will be defined based on the use of sensory feedback system integrated with the amputees hand prosthesis. The subject should use the hand prosthesis, with sensory feedback, for a duration of minimum 2 h per day during a 4 week period.
Preferably, the system should be used actively in normal daily activities.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Lund, Sweden, SE-22100
- Fredrik Sebelius
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Transradial amputation
- Amputation should be in a stable phase
- Other treatments for PLP tried with poor result
- PLP experienced as over 6 on a visual analogue scale
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairment
- Pregnancy
- History of active substance abuse disorder
- Acquired brain injury with residual impairment
- Intelligence disability
- Neurologic or musculoskeletal disease or other diseases that may affect the function of nervous system
- Pacemaker
- dermatologic condition
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Non-invasive sensory feedback
|
A non-invasive simple sensory feedback system, which provides the user of a prosthetic hand with sensory feedback on the arm stump.
It is mediated by air in a closed loop system connecting silicone pads on the prosthetic hand with pads on the amputation stump.
The silicone pads in a "tactile display" on the amputation stump expand when their corresponding sensor-bulb in the prosthesis is touched, evoking an experience of "real touch".
Most amputees experience phantom limb sensations and/or phantom limb pain, as well as residual limb stump pain.
There is often a "map" of the phantom hand on the amputation stump, where pressure on specific skin areas result in evoked sensation from specific fingers in the amputated phantom hand.
This map is the target for the sensory feedback.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in phantom Limb pain
Time Frame: Baseline and after 4 week treatment
|
Baseline status includes: phantom limb pain assessed using visual analogue scale.
|
Baseline and after 4 week treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cortical reorganization
Time Frame: Baseline and after 4 week treatment (2 hours/day)
|
MRI: Change in cortical response during sensory stimulation is examined
|
Baseline and after 4 week treatment (2 hours/day)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Fredrik Sebelius, PhD, Lund University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- EPIONE-LU
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.