Left Lateral Position and Prone Position for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

April 6, 2016 updated by: Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital

A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety Between Left Lateral Position and Prone Position for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been widely used in diagnosis and treatment of pancreaticobiliary diseases. Traditionally, ERCP has been performed in the prone position. The prone position for ERCP can facilitate selective bile duct cannulation, offer a better fluoroscopic image of pancreaticobiliary anatomy, and prevent aspiration of gastric contents. However, in cases of difficult in the prone position, ERCP has been performed in the left lateral or supine position. Compared with the prone position, left lateral position is more comfortable for patients, especially with limitation for cervical movement including cervical cord injury, cervical spine operation, parkinson's disease, contracture due to cerebral infarction, and allow more easy passage of the scope through the pharynx, and useful to secure airway. However, in the left lateral position, it is difficult to obtain fluoroscopic image of right hepatic duct and intrahepatic bile duct.

In cases of severe abdominal pain, severe abdominal distension, large amount of ascites, recent abdominal surgery or cervical spine surgery, intra-abdominal catheter insertion, severe obesity, it is difficult to position in prone or left lateral, therefore, ERCP may be performed in the supine position. In supine position for ERCP, there has been documented increased risk of cardiopulmonary adverse event and decreased success rate of selective bile duct cannulation.

There have been reported the efficacy and safety between the prone position and supine position for ERCP in several studies. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety between the prone position and left lateral position for ERCP in this prospective, randomized study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Methods

  1. Written informed consent for the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is obtained from all patients.
  2. Blood culture is performed, and intravenous 3rd generation cephalosporin is administered routinely.
  3. Before endoscopic procedure, patients are randomly assigned to left lateral position or prone position for the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
  4. Conscious sedation is performed by non-anesthesiologist-assisted method. Intravenous midazolam 0.05-0.1 mg/kg and/or intravenous propofol 0.5mg-1mg/kg is administered. Analgesics was administered intravenous meperidine 25mg in patients with older than 50 years and meperidine 50mg in patients with younger than 50 years. To limit duodenal peristalsis hyoscine-N-butylbromide is administered intravenously.
  5. All patients are provided oxygen 2liter/minute via nasal prong. Patient's oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure and respiration are monitored during procedure.
  6. Selective bile duct cannulation is performed by wire-guided cannulation method. If adverse event is occur during endoscopic procedure, it is recorded in the case report form as intra-procedural adverse event.
  7. After 4 hours, 24 hours, 2 weeks and 6 weeks of the procedure, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, platelet count, total bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma glutamyl transaminase, amylase, lipase, abdomen X-ray, chest X-ray are performed.
  8. Oral feeding is started with sips of water after 24 hours of endoscopic sphincterotomy and/or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation.
  9. Development of adverse event including bleeding, perforation, pancreatitis, hyperamylasemia, infection, basket impaction, cardiopulmonary adverse event, mortality are recorded according to left lateral position or prone position for the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gangwon-do
      • Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, Korea, Republic of, 200-704
        • Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All of followings:

    1. Any of following indications for ERCP

      ① Common bile duct stone

      ② Gallstone pancreatitis

      ③ Obstructive jaundice due to malignancy (ex. Pancreas cancer, bile duct cancer, ampulla of Vater cancer)

      ④ Common bile duct invasion metastasis of other organ malignancy (ex. Hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct invasion, metastatic lymphadenopathy with bile duct invasion from malignancy other than pancreaticobiliary malignancy)

      ⑤ Benign biliary stricture

    2. Naïve papilla
    3. Aged over 20 years

      Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any of followings:

    1. History of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    2. Altered gastric and duodenal anatomy due to intra-abdominal surgery (ex. Billroth gastrectomy, total gastrectomy)
    3. Patients with severe infection or hemodynamic unstable (ex. septic shock, intubation, ventilator, inotropics)
    4. Recent myocardial infarction (within 6 months) or uncontrolled arrhythmia, unstable angina, or congestive heart failure
    5. Severe neurologic disease
    6. Patients with possible prone position (ex. severe abdominal pain, severe abdominal distension, large amount of ascites, recent intra-abdominal surgery, neck surgery, intra-abdominal catheter insertion, severe obesity)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Left lateral position
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is performed in left lateral position in this group.
  1. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is started using conventional duodenoscope (TJF 240 or 260V, Olympus Optical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) in randomly assigned left lateral position or prone position.
  2. Selective bile duct cannulation is performed using wire-guided cannulation.
  3. In case of difficult cannulation, precut is performed using a needle-knife.
  4. After selective cannulation, cholangiogram is obtained using ERCP catheter, and endoscopic sphincterotomy and/or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation is performed.
Other Names:
  • Endoscopic biliary drainge
Active Comparator: Prone position
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is performed in prone position in this group.
  1. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is started using conventional duodenoscope (TJF 240 or 260V, Olympus Optical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) in randomly assigned left lateral position or prone position.
  2. Selective bile duct cannulation is performed using wire-guided cannulation.
  3. In case of difficult cannulation, precut is performed using a needle-knife.
  4. After selective cannulation, cholangiogram is obtained using ERCP catheter, and endoscopic sphincterotomy and/or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation is performed.
Other Names:
  • Endoscopic biliary drainge

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
success in selective bile duct cannulation
Time Frame: within first 1 hour after attempt of bile duct cannulation
within first 1 hour after attempt of bile duct cannulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse event
Time Frame: within 14 days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
within 14 days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tae Young Park, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Choledocholithiasis

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

3
Subscribe