Compare of Surgical Condition and Complications With Moderate and Deep NM Block (MISPCNUHH)

November 8, 2015 updated by: Seongwook Jeong, Chonnam National University Hospital

A Randomized, Parallel Design, Single-center Study to Compare of Surgical Condition and Postoperative Complications With Moderate and Deep Neuromuscular Blockade in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy

This study is designed to evaluate the surgeon's satisfaction with either deep or moderate neuromuscular blockade during laparoscopic gastrectomy surgery and observe the recovery profiles in the recovery room and the ward.The explorative objective of this study is to evaluate the safety profiles of deep and moderate neuromuscular blockades via observation of postoperative complications.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are frequently using during anesthesia to facilitate tracheal intubation and to improve surgical conditions. In an adequately anesthetized and monitored patient, the presence of one or two responses in the train-of-four (TOF) pattern normally indicates sufficient relaxation for most surgical procedures in general practices. It has been called moderate neuromuscular blockade (mNMB) condition. Nowadays, laparoscopic surgeries have expanded impressively into various areas of surgeries, both in scope and volume. If any hypothetical advantages of deep neuromuscular blockade (dNMB) during laparoscopic surgery turned out to be realized in practice with sufficient supporting evidence, it would become an important anesthetic option for better patient outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hwasun, Korea, Republic of, 519-763
        • Chonnam University Hwasun Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult (≥ 20 years of age) patients scheduled for an elective laparoscopic gastrectomy who have signed the written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to rocuronuim, cisatracurium or sugammadex
  • Significant liver or kidney dysfunction
  • Any neuromuscular disease
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • Indication for rapid sequence induction
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Patients taking any medication with potential interference with neuromuscular transmission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Modarate Blockade Group
Neuromuscular blocking agent, cis-atracurium will be administered after skin incision and reversal agents, pyridostigmine & glycopyrrolate will be given for the recovery.
Intermittent injection of cis-atracurium for TOF 1 + Pyridostigmine & Glycopyrrolate
Other Names:
  • Nimbex®
Experimental: Deep Blockade Group
Neuromuscular blocking agent, rocuronium will be administered after skin incision and reversal agent, Sugammadex will be given for the recovery.
Continuous infusion of rocuronium for PTC 1 + Sugammadex
Other Names:
  • Esmeron®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical rating SCORE(SRS)
Time Frame: every 15 minutes from the pneumoperitoneum, up to 120 minutes till the end of surgery
excellent (5), good but not optimal (4), moderate (3), poor but acceptable (2) or poor and unacceptable (1)
every 15 minutes from the pneumoperitoneum, up to 120 minutes till the end of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory rate
Time Frame: every 15 minutes from the arrival on the recovery room, up to 60 minutes
Respiratory rate of patient
every 15 minutes from the arrival on the recovery room, up to 60 minutes
peripheral arterial oxygen saturation
Time Frame: every 15 minutes from the arrival on the recovery room, up to 60 minutes
peripheral arterial oxygen saturation(sPO2)
every 15 minutes from the arrival on the recovery room, up to 60 minutes
visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: every 15 minutes from the arrival on the recovery room, up to 60 minutes
visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain
every 15 minutes from the arrival on the recovery room, up to 60 minutes
occurrence of nausea or vomiting
Time Frame: every 15 minutes from the arrival on the recovery room, up to 60 minutes
occurrence of nausea or vomiting with Rhodes Index
every 15 minutes from the arrival on the recovery room, up to 60 minutes
the level of sedation or alertness
Time Frame: every 15 minutes from the arrival on the recovery room, up to 60 minutes
the level of sedation or alertness with OAA/S scale
every 15 minutes from the arrival on the recovery room, up to 60 minutes
Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale (PQRS)
Time Frame: at baseline (the day before surgery), at 1 hour after surgery, at 6 hours after surgery, at 24 hours after surgery and at 7 days after surgery
physiologic, nociceptive, emotive, cognitive and activities of daily living
at baseline (the day before surgery), at 1 hour after surgery, at 6 hours after surgery, at 24 hours after surgery and at 7 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: SEONGWOOK JEONG, MD, PhD., Chonnam University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 10, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular Blockade

Clinical Trials on cis-atracurium

3
Subscribe