Tight Control Dose Reductions of Biologics in Psoriasis Patients With Low Disease Activity

March 29, 2019 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Tight Control Dose Reductions of Biologics in Psoriasis Patients With Low Disease Activity: A Randomized Pragmatic Trial

Rationale/hypothesis: Moderate-to-severe psoriasis can be treated with biologics.

Objective To investigate whether the dose of biologics can be reduced in patients with psoriasis with stable disease.

Study design: A pragmatic, multicentre, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study with cost-effectiveness analysis.

Study population: Patients with disease remission using normal dose of biologics.

Intervention: 120 patients will be randomized into two groups: (1) dose reduction and (2) normal dose.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is clinical effectiveness. Secondary outcomes are: health-related quality of life (HRQoL), number and time to disease flares, costs, health status, anti-drug antibody formation and serious adverse events

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Rationale/hypothesis: Moderate-to-severe psoriasis can be treated with biologics. These drugs have significantly improved the quality of life of psoriasis patients, but are very expensive drugs that should be used as efficiently as possible. In addition, the long-term safety profile can probably be improved if patients receive the lowest effective dose.

Objective To investigate whether the dose of biologics can be reduced in patients with psoriasis with stable disease: Is dose reduction non-inferior to the current practice regarding clinical effectiveness? Secondary aims are: to investigate what influence dose tapering has on quality of life, whether there are predictors for successful dose reduction, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of dose reduction.

Study design: A pragmatic, multicentre, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study with cost-effectiveness analysis.

Study population: Patients who used a biologic for at least 6 months (etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab) can be included if they have long-term stable low disease activity. Low disease activity is defined as a PASI score (Psoriasis Area and Activity Score) <5 and a health-related quality of life score ≤5 (Dermatology Quality of life index: DLQI).

Intervention: 120 patients will be randomized into two groups: (1) dose reduction guided by PASI and DLQI (n=60, intervention) and (2) maintenance of normal dosage (n=60, usual care).

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is clinical effectiveness. Secondary outcomes are: health-related quality of life (HRQoL), number and time to disease flares, costs, health status, anti-drug antibody formation and serious adverse events

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Almelo, Netherlands
        • ZGT hospital
      • Apeldoorn, Netherlands
        • Gelre Hospitals
      • Doetinchem, Netherlands
        • Slingeland Hospital
      • Geldrop, Netherlands
        • St. Anna Hospital
      • Hengelo, Netherlands
        • ZGT
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Radboudumc, dept of dermatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sustained low disease activity as described above on the dose as advised by the label.
  • Established diagnosis of plaque psoriasis.
  • Receiving treatment with adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab for at least 6 months.*
  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Ability to understand informed consent, read and answer questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psoriasis itself is not the main reason for biologic prescription (e.g. when a patient has RA and psoriasis, and RA is the main reason for the biologic).
  • Concomitant use of immunosuppressants other than methotrexate or acitretin for psoriasis.
  • Severe comorbidities with short life-expectancy (e.g. metastasized tumour).
  • Presumed inability to follow the study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dose decrease
Patients receive daily practice care, but doses of etanercept, adalimumab or ustekinumab will be lowered: intervals of drug-administration will be prolonged stepwise with tight control of disease activity and DLQI. First, the dose will be decreased to 66-70% of the normal dose (by interval prolongation with a factor 1.5). If patients remain in a state of low disease activity, the dose will be further reduced to 50% (by doubling the original interval). Each step will be analyzed after three months, or when the patient visits earlier due to complaints.
Treatment strategy change: dose decrease based on PASI and DLQI
Other: Usual care
Patients will continue treatment with the normal dose and treatment regimens will be based on usual daily practice care. Treatment decisions are made at the discretion of the treating physician.
Usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-activity
Time Frame: 1 year
Disease-activity measured by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), effectiveness measure used in most psoriasis trials.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL-DLQI)
Time Frame: 1 year
HRQoL(Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
1 year
Number of patients with 1 or more persistent flares
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of patients with 1 or more persistent flares (persistent flare is defined as at least 3 months PASI increase >5 or DLQI >5)
1 year
Disease-activity measured with HsCRP
Time Frame: 1 year
High-sensitivity CRP, a possible marker for disease-activity
1 year
Predictors for succesful dose decrease (treatment and patient characteristics)
Time Frame: 1 year
For both groups, patient (sex, age, PsA, comorbidities) and treatment characteristics (antibody formation, through levels of drug, dose of biologic, drug pauses, use of concomitant antipsoriatic systemic drugs (dose and duration of use), use of topical therapies during treatment (steroid class and duration of use)) will be collected. These will be used to identify predictors for successful dose reduction.
1 year
Anti-drug antibody levels against etanercept, adalimumab or ustekinumab
Time Frame: 1 year
Anti-drug antibodies (AU/mL) of the used biologic (etanercept, adalimumab or ustekinumab) will be measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or ELISA. Measures will take place at baseline and every study visit (week 0, 12, 24, 36 and 49). Anti-drug antibody levels will be used to assess whether they predict successful dose decrease.
1 year
Drug trough levels of etanercept, adalimumab or ustekinumab
Time Frame: 1 year
Drug trough levels (mg/l) of the used biologic (etanercept, adalimumab or ustekinumab) will be measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or ELISA. Measures will take place at baseline and every study visit (aprox. every 3 months). Anti-drug antibody levels will be used to assess whether they predict successful dose decrease.
1 year
Number of serious adverse events per patient
Time Frame: 1 year
All serious adverse events (SAE) during study participation and their causal relation with the biologic will be assessed.
1 year
Costs related to medical consumption
Time Frame: 1 year
For cost-effectiveness analyses, questionnaires iMTA MCQ (medical consumption questionnaire) will be administered in each group at every study visit except baseline (week 12, 24, 36, 49).Data will be incorporated and presented in a cost-effectiveness analysis.
1 year
Costs related to productivity
Time Frame: 1 year
For cost-effectiveness analyses, questionnaire iMTA PCQ (productivity cost questionnaire) will be administered in each group at every study visit except baseline (week 12, 24, 36, 49).Data will be incorporated and presented in a cost-effectiveness analysis.
1 year
Health status (SF36)
Time Frame: 1 year
SF-36v2 questionnaire will be used to measure health status. Outcomes will be presented seperataly (scores for mental and physical health domain); but will also be incorporated and presented in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Questionnaire will be administered every study visit except baseline (week 12, 24, 36, 49).
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: E de Jong, MD, Dept. of Dermatology, Radboudumc, The Netherlands

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CONDOR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on Usual care

3
Subscribe