Clofarabine, Cytarabine and Mitoxantrone (CLAM) for Relapsed or Refractory AML

October 3, 2022 updated by: The University of Hong Kong
The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the regimen CLAM in relapsed or refractory AML when used as first salvage for patients to relapse or fail after standard treatment with daunorubicin/cytarabine induction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Clofarabine, a second generation purine nucleoside analog, has been evaluated in several studies in relapsed AML.[1-3] Safety and dosages of clorafabine have already been determined in previous phase I/II studies. A demonstrable complete remission rate of up to 40% to 50% was shown in relapsed or refractory AML.[4-6] Since 2009, Clofarabine (40mg/m2/day for 5 days) in combination with high-dose cytarabine (2g/m2/day for 5 days) (CLARA) was adopted as the re-induction protocol for relapsed or refractory patients with AML at the Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital. We have shown that this protocol is safe, tolerable and effective for relapsed AML. A recent updated analysis (Gill H et al., unpublished) showed a completed response rate of 50.8%. With the CLARA regimen, all patients (N=60) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. 8% developed grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity and 40% developed febrile neutropenia with clinical sepsis. There is increasing evidence to show that clofarabine is safe and efficacious when combined with the anthracyclines idarubicin or daunorubicin.7,8 In this prospective study, we combine clofarabine and cytarabine (Ara-C) with the topoisomerase II inhibitor mitoxantrone. In this protocol, the dosages of clofarabine and cytarabine will be reduced to 30mg/m2/day and 750mg/m2/day respectively, comparable to most clinical trials. In our previous publication of experience with the use of CLARA by Tse et al and Leung et al, clofarabine at 40mg/m2/day for 5 days was combined with high-dose cytarabine at 2g/m2/day.[5,6] The regimen was shown to be safe. The combination of clofarabine with anthracyclines has been evaluated. Mathiesen at al evaluated the CIA regimen comprising clofarabine at 20mg/m2/day from day 1 to day 5, idarubicin at 10mg/m2/day from day 1 to day 3 and cytarabine at 1g/m2/day from day 1 to day 5.[7] Abbie et al investigated the regimen comprising Clofarabine at 20mg/m2/day or 25mg/m2/day for 5 days in combination with mitoxantrone and etoposide.7 Based on the clinical trials and our extensive experience with the use of CLARA, the dosages of clofarabine in CLAM was determined. With the significant reduction in the dose of cytarabine to 750mg/m2/day for 5 days in CLAM, the dose of clofarabine was chosen at 30mg/m2/day for 5 days with the aim to maintain the efficacy seen with CLARA. The aim of this combination is to maintain or improve treatment efficacy seen with a lower treatment-related toxicity via dose reduction of clofarabine and cytarabine compared to CLARA. CLAM is expected to be safe and tolerable especially when used as first salvage in patient with a ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. The regimen CLAM has been approved by the institutional review board of Queen Mary Hospital/University of Hong Kong. In a pilot study, 4 patients used the regimen. 2 patients achieved a complete remission. Cardiotoxicity was not seen. Grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity was not seen. There were no treatment-related mortality observed. CLAM was shown to be safe and with manageable toxicity profile. In addition, less myeloid toxicity is expected during consolidation as patients who achieve a remission will have better marrow reserve when compared to those at relapse. Patients will have their cardiac, liver and renal function and performance status evaluated continuously and patients with cardiac dysfunction, significantly impaired renal or liver function and ECOG performance status of 2 or above will be excluded. Thus consolidation with the same dose as with induction is expected to be safe and tolerable.

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the regimen CLAM in relapsed or refractory AML when used as first salvage for patients to relapse or fail after standard treatment with daunorubicin/cytarabine induction. We aim to improve treatment efficacy at a more tolerable dose of clofarabine and cytarabine compared to CLARA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after one first-line chemotherapy regimen
  2. Patients aged 18 - 65 inclusively
  3. European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of less than 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged less than 18 or above 65
  2. ECOG performance status of 2 or more
  3. Acute promyelocytic leukaemia
  4. Uncontrolled active infection
  5. Uncontrolled arrhythmia
  6. Altered renal dysfunction with serum creatinine > 1.5 x ULN and/or creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min
  7. Significant neurologic (grade > 2) or psychiatric disorder, dementia or seizures
  8. Clinical symptoms suggesting active central nervous system leukemia
  9. Severe complications of leukemia such as uncontrolled bleeding, pneumonia with hypoxia or shock or disseminated intravascular coagulation
  10. Patients with known HIV, Hepatitis B or C infection or history of cirrhosis
  11. Patients Significant hepatic dysfunction: Direct bilirubin > 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for age; ALT or AST > 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for age; Lipase > 2.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for age
  12. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Clofarabine, AraC, mitoxantrone (CLAM)
This is the single arm with the intervention using Clofarabine, AraC, Mitoxantrone
The combination of clofarabine, cytarabine (Ara-C) and mitoxantrone will be used in patients with AML in first relapse or after failure of first salvage
Other Names:
  • CLAM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate
Time Frame: Day 28
Remission status will be assessed on day 28 of treatment for the assessment of response rate using standard criteria
Day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Leukemia-free survival
Time Frame: 2 years
This is defined as time (in months) from remission after CLAM regimen to relapse (event), death (censor), HSCT (censor) or latest follow-up (censor).
2 years
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
This is defined as the time (in months) from recruitment to death (event) or latest follow-up (censor).
5 years
Adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year
Toxicity will be defined using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Data on all toxicities listed will be recorded.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Harinder Singh, Harry Gill, MD, The University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Clofarabine, AraC, mitoxantrone (CLAM)

3
Subscribe