- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02736370
Early Weight Bearing for Ankle Fractures
September 21, 2023 updated by: Spectrum Health Hospitals
Early Weight Bearing for Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures Without Syndesmotic Disruption
The purpose of this observational study is to assess the rate of return to work, rate of return to activities, functional outcome measures and pain scores in operatively repaired rotational Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar (AO/OTA Classification of 44A and 44B) ankle fractures not requiring fixation of the syndesmosis and allowed early weight bearing on or before the first post-operative visit.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
19
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients that present with bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fractures
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and women ages of 18 and up
- Closed, low-energy Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar rotational ankle fractures
- Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification of 44A and 44B
- English speaking
- Able and willing to consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Open fractures
- OTA classification of 43 and 44C
- Patients with diabetes mellitus
- No other lower extremity injuries that would affect functional outcomes
- Previous use of walking aides
- Patients with paralysis or hemiplegia
- Ankle fractures requiring syndesmotic repair
- Ankle fractures requiring fixation of the posterior malleolar
- Associated neurovascular injury
- Problems maintaining follow up (homeless or not willing to return for follow up)
- Pathological fractures
- Prisoners
- Patients not allowed to bear weight before the 6 week post-operative follow up visit
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Functional Outcome Scores
Time Frame: 12 months post operatively
|
During follow up visits functional outcomes scores will be assess using the Foot and Ankle Score and the PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Mobility Measure questionnaires.
These forms will be analyzed together to determine the patients functional outcomes.
|
12 months post operatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Return to work
Time Frame: up to 12 months
|
During follow up visits the patients return to work status will be assessed.
|
up to 12 months
|
Fracture Healing
Time Frame: up to 12 months
|
During follow up visits fractures healing will be assessed by physician review of x-rays.
|
up to 12 months
|
Pain Scores
Time Frame: 12 months post operatively
|
Pain Scores and PROMIS Pain Intensity and Interference questionnaires will be assessed during follow up.
These forms will be analyzed together to determine the patients overall pain.
|
12 months post operatively
|
Post operative complications
Time Frame: up to 12 months
|
Post operative complications will be assessed during follow up visits.
|
up to 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Blake W Miller, DO, Spectrum Health Hospitals
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 12, 2016
First Posted (Estimated)
April 13, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 22, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 21, 2023
Last Verified
September 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2016-081
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Broken Ankle
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingCementation Teeth | Badly Broken Down Vital Teeth
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedBroken Down Molars | IPS-emmax CrownsSyrian Arab Republic
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownBadly Broken Maxillary Premolars Indicated for Extraction
-
British University In EgyptActive, not recruitingBadly Broken Tooth in a Socket Type II Eligible to be Replaced by Immediate ImplantEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityTerminatedIndirect Restoration of Badly Broken Vital TeethEgypt
-
Implantology InstituteRecruitingEndosseous Dental Implant Failure | Accident Caused by Broken CeramicPortugal
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Georgia State UniversityNational Athletic Trainers' Association Research & Education Foundation (NATA...CompletedChronic Ankle Instability | Ankle Sprains | Ankle RehabilitationUnited States