RCT:Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) - Ambu AuraGain vs LMA Supreme (OLP-Aur/Sup)

June 5, 2017 updated by: David Wong, University Health Network, Toronto

Comparison of Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure Between the Ambu AuraGain and the LMA Supreme - a Prospective Randomized Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the leak pressure of the recently introduced laryngeal mask airway, Ambu AuraGain performs superior to the established laryngeal mask LMA Supreme in surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia. This leak pressure is the pressure at which a gas leaks around the airway, which is a key marker of efficacy and safety of its use; a higher leak pressure suggests a better seal between the artificial airway and patient's airway.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

170

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
        • Toronto Western Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

ASA physical status I to III Adults more above 18 years Ambulatory surgeries under general anesthesia in supine position requiring laryngeal masks- Knee arthroscopies, bladder tumour resections, hand, eye and general surgical procedures Muscle relaxant not required

Exclusion Criteria

Reduced mouth opening less than 2.5 cms Recent upper respiratory tract infection and sore throat in last 2 weeks Contraindications to laryngeal mask use as in morbid obesity- BMI more than 40 and severe symptomatic esophageal reflux disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ambu AuraGain (Group A)
Laryngeal mask Ambu AuraGain will be used, and oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) after insertion will be recorded as the primary outcome measure
Active Comparator: LMA Supreme (Group S)
Laryngeal mask Supreme will be used, and oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) after insertion will be recorded as the primary outcome measure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) for each airway device after insertion
Time Frame: Within 2-3 minutes after laryngeal mask insertion before start of surgery.
OLP is defined as 'the anesthesia circuit pressure at which a gas leak occurs around the SAD'.
Within 2-3 minutes after laryngeal mask insertion before start of surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phrayngolaryngeal complications
Time Frame: at 1 hr, 2hr and 24 hrs after the surgery
Complications like sore throat, dysphonia, dysphagia
at 1 hr, 2hr and 24 hrs after the surgery
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
Time Frame: at 1 hr, 2hr and 24 hrs after the surgery
PONV in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU)- PONV will be recorded as only None for No PONV and Yes for present. Severity grading will not be recorded.
at 1 hr, 2hr and 24 hrs after the surgery
Satisfaction of patient and the anesthesiologist with the device
Time Frame: After 1hr in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU)
Patient satisfaction (5 point scale)- 0 for very dissatisfied to 5 for very satisfied Anesthesiologist satisfaction scale- Low, Moderate and High
After 1hr in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David T Wong, MD, Uinversity Health Network (UHN), Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14-8360-B

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laryngeal Masks

Clinical Trials on Ambu AuraGain

3
Subscribe