Laryngeal Mask Insertion Conditions And Hemodynamic Effects

August 18, 2017 updated by: Leila mansali stambouli

Laryngeal Mask Insertion Conditions And Hemodynamic Effects After Propofol And Ketamine-Propofol Co-induction

This interventional double-blind, randomized trial has included120 children of American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I or II aged between 1and 8 years of either sex, scheduled for outpatient minor surgery under general anesthesia.This study examined whether co-induction with ketamine-propofol enhance laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion conditions and preserve hemodynamic state in patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study aims to compare two anesthesia protocols: propofol induction with or without a prior injection of ketamine, in term of LMA insertion conditions(favorable= satisfactory or unfavorable= unsatisfactory ) and hemodynamic effects (decrease of 20 % from baseline of blood pressure and heart rate).

The conditions of LMA insertion have been assessed in each study group by an experimented anesthesiologist, who was unaware of the treatment group assignment. Conditions were considered satisfactory, if the 4 following criteria were acceptable: the jaw was relaxed, there was no coughing, swallowing and no limb movement, and then the LMA was inserted. When the investigators save at least one unacceptable of these criteria, conditions were considered to be unsatisfactory and thereafter anesthesia was deepened with supplemental dose of propofol 1mg.kg-¹ and 1 minute later a reinsertion was attempted. The total number of attempts at LMA insertion was recorded. Children trachea was intubated after 3 failed attempts of LMA insertion, and then patient was excluded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Monastir, Tunisia, 5000
        • University Hospital of Fattouma Bourguiba

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status I or II who were scheduled to minor elective ambulatory surgery (e.g. inguinal hernia, undescended testes, umbilical hernia) performed by experienced surgeon under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with full stomach
  • A history of gastric reflux
  • A history of convulsions, cardiovascular or neuromuscular disease
  • Allergies to the study drugs
  • obese children
  • suspected difficult airway and hyper-reactive airway disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ketamine-propofol group

Ketamine (50mg/ml) at 0.5 mg.kg-1 was injected intravenously 1min prior 3 mgkg-1 of propofol and 1 min before LMA insertion in Ketamine-propofol group.

sevoflurane 6-7% was used on vaporizer setting with 50% nitrous oxide in oxgen prior intravenous anesthesia. The loss of eyelash reflex was considered as the desired end point for induction.

Ketamine 0,5mg.kg-¹was injected intravenously one minute prior propofol 3mg.kg-¹ and one minute before LMA insertion in Ketamine-propofol group
Other Names:
  • sevoflurane, nitrous oxide (N2O)
Placebo Comparator: propofol group

0,9% saline solution ( Placebo ) at the same volume as ketamine (50mg/ml) was injected intravenously 1min prior propofol 3 mg.kg-1 and 1 min before LMA insertion in propofol group.

sevoflurane 6-7% was used on vaporizer setting with 50% nitrous oxide in oxgen prior intravenous anesthesia. The loss of eyelash reflex was considered as the desired end point for induction.

The control group which received intravenously the same volume with normal saline one minute prior propofol 3mg.kg-¹ and 1 min before LMA insertion in propofol group
Other Names:
  • sevoflurane, N2O

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LMA insertion conditions
Time Frame: 2 minutes

satisfactory conditions of LMA insertion are defined as when 4 criteria were acceptable: jaw relaxation, no coughing or swallowing and no limb movement.

unsatisfactory conditions of LMA insertion is defined as when there's at least one unacceptable of these criteria

2 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hemodynamic effects
Time Frame: from Baseline period until 10 minutes after LMA insertion
mean blood pressure (MAP) in mmHg . Heart Rate (HR) in beats per minute (time frame: from baseline to LMA insertion)
from Baseline period until 10 minutes after LMA insertion

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
delirium
Time Frame: from awake until 30 min after emergence
Emergence delirium was assessed by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAED) and was defined as a PAED score >10
from awake until 30 min after emergence

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: leila Mansali Stambouli, MD PhD, university Hospital of Fattouma Bourguiba, Monastir, TUNISIA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laryngeal Masks

Clinical Trials on Ketamine

3
Subscribe