Supporting Children's School Readiness.

May 1, 2018 updated by: Danielle Matthews, University of Sheffield

A Randomised Control Trial to Test the Effect of Parents' Inference-eliciting Questions During Shared Book Reading on 4-year-olds' Listening Comprehension

The aim of this project is to test whether training parents to ask their children 'inference- eliciting' questions during book reading is effective in promoting story comprehension for 4-year-olds from a range of socio-economic backgrounds.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Language comprehension relies on the ability to make local and global inferences (e.g., inferring what a pronoun refers to, or inferring why a protagonist in a story did something based on information distributed through the text). These skills develop in the preschool years and are demonstrated when children make sense of stories that are read to them. While important for later reading ability and academic success, relatively little is known about whether anything can be done to improve inference-making skills in the preschool years. One possibility is that parent-child book reading would help. During book reading, some parents naturally ask their children questions about the story that would require them to make inferences about the text. The current study is designed to test whether doing this promotes children's ability to make inferences. Half the parents in this study will be given books with inference eliciting questions added to them and will be provided with training about how to ask these questions and respond to their children's answers. The other half of the parents will be given a maths exercise book and asked to spend the same amount of time per day working through this.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Yorkshire
      • Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, S10 2TN
        • University of Sheffield

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 4 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Children are:

First born Full term (i.e. born no more than 3 weeks prematurely) With birth weight over 2.5 kg Being raised as monolingual English speakers

Exclusion Criteria:

Neither caregivers nor infants have any significant known physical, mental or learning disability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Language comprehension intervention
The intervention will run for 4 weeks. Caregivers will be provided with storybooks (e.g., Percy the Park Keeper) that have been amended to include inference-eliciting questions. Caregivers will be trained (with a video) to ask these questions and respond to their children's answers during shared reading sessions. They will be asked to read one book per day. Caregivers will keep a reading diary.
Active Comparator: Counting intervention
The intervention will run for 4 weeks. Caregivers will be provided with a book 'At home with counting' that is made up of age appropriate maths exercises. Caregivers will trained (with a video) to work through one page of the book per day. This should take the same amount of time as the activity in the language intervention condition. Caregivers will keep a counting diary.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change after 4 weeks in children's ability to answer inference questions.
Time Frame: Baseline: when child is 4 years 3 months. Post test: 4 weeks post intervention
An age-appropriate test of inferencing ability has been developed for this study including vignettes developed by the Language and Reading Research Consortium. Children listen to short vignettes and are then asked questions that require them to make local and global inferences based on the information in the stories.
Baseline: when child is 4 years 3 months. Post test: 4 weeks post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in NFER baseline assessment
Time Frame: Baseline: when child is 4 years 3 months - 4 years 6 months. Post test: 4 weeks post intervention
This is an age appropriate test of maths and language ability.
Baseline: when child is 4 years 3 months - 4 years 6 months. Post test: 4 weeks post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Danielle E Matthews, PhD, University of Sheffield
  • Principal Investigator: Catherine Davies, PhD, University of Leeds

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 3, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R/139470-11-1-INFERENCE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Yes. IPD will be archived in accordance with the guidelines and protocol of the University of Sheffield, the UK Data Archive and the ESRC's Research Data Policy. With parents' permission, data will be made available in a timely manner, after outcomes have been published together with appropriate metadata in line with ESRC policy around data archiving.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Language Development

Clinical Trials on Language comprehension intervention

3
Subscribe