How Parents Can Help Babies Learn to Talk With Picture Books.

May 1, 2018 updated by: Danielle Matthews, University of Sheffield

A Randomised Control Trial to Test the Effect of Parent Contingent Talk During Shared Book Reading on Infant Language Learning.

The aim of this project is to test whether giving parents advice about book reading is effective in promoting language learning for infants from a range of socio-economic backgrounds.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Children from disadvantaged families tend to have limited language skills compared to their advantaged peers. While many factors contribute to language ability, two aspects of the early caregiving environment are known to be correlated with child language outcomes 1) caregiver-child book reading and 2) caregiver contingent talk. Contingent talk refers to a style of communication whereby the caregiver talks about what is in their infant's current focus of attention. This style of talking can be facilitated when parents read books with their babies. The aim of this research is to establish whether asking parents to engage in contingent talk in the context of book reading promotes vocabulary learning. This study will compare the effects of an intervention to promote contingent talk against a control where parents are given books but not given any training in how to read them in a contingent manner. The study will include children from socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged families.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

156

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Yorkshire
      • Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, S10 2TN
        • University of Sheffield

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 months to 11 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Infants must be:

  • first born and singletons
  • full term (i.e. born no more than 3 weeks prematurely)
  • with birth weight over 2.5 kg.

Primary caregivers must:

  • work less than 24 hours per week (i.e., be the caregiver the child spends most time with)
  • be raising their child as monolingual English speakers.

Exclusion criteria:

Neither caregivers nor infants must have any significant known physical, mental or learning disability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Contingent Reading Intervention
Caregivers will be provided with 6 picture books. They will be trained to use contingent talk when looking at picture books with their infants. They will be asked to spend 10 mintues each day engaging in contingent talk while looking at picture books. The intervention will run for 4 months. Parents will be asked to keep a daily reading diary.
Other: Book Provision Control
Caregivers will be provided with 6 picture books. They will not be trained to read with their child. They will receive information from other sources (e.g. health visitors and Book Start schemes) as normal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in infant expressive vocabulary
Time Frame: Baseline: 11 months, outcome: 15 months
Parents will complete a standardised assessment of vocabulary, the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI).
Baseline: 11 months, outcome: 15 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in caregiver reported frequency of reading
Time Frame: Baseline: 11 months, outcome: 15 months
Parents will complete a questionnaire about how frequently they read with their child.
Baseline: 11 months, outcome: 15 months
Infant Real Time Language Understanding: Accuracy
Time Frame: 15 months
Infants' real-time comprehension of familiar words will be assessed at 15 months using the looking-while-listening (LWL) procedure (Fernald et al., 2008). Infants will sit in front of a computer screen with a picture on either side of it (e.g., a bottle and a shoe). We will measure the accuracy with which they look to the correct picture upon hearing a word that describes it.
15 months
Infant Real Time Language Understanding: Reaction Time
Time Frame: 15 months
Infants' real-time comprehension of familiar words will be assessed at 15 months using the looking-while-listening (LWL) procedure (Fernald et al., 2008). We will measure the time it takes the child to look from a distractor to the target.
15 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in caregiver contingent talk while book reading
Time Frame: Baseline: 11 months, outcome: 15 months
Video recordings of dyads reading books will be analysed for quantity of caregiver contingent talk.
Baseline: 11 months, outcome: 15 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Danielle E Matthews, PhD, University of Sheffield

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 24, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R/139470-11-1-INFANCY

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

With participants' permission, IPD will be archived in accordance with the guidelines of the University of Sheffield, the UK Data Archive and the ESRC's Research Data Policy.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Language Development

Clinical Trials on Contingent Reading Intervention

3
Subscribe