- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02902653
Efficacy and Safety of Hourly Titrated Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone and Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction
February 9, 2018 updated by: Oihane Lapuente Ocamica
Efficacy and Safety of Hourly Titrated Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone and Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: Randomized Clinical Trial
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the administration of oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
372
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Oihane Lapuente Ocamica
- Email: OIHANE.LAPUENTEOCAMICA@osakidetza.eus
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Amanda Lopez Picado
- Email: amanda.lopezpicado@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Basque Country
-
Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain, 01009
- Recruiting
- Araba University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Oihane Lapuente Ocamica
- Email: OIHANE.LAPUENTEOCAMICA@osakidetza.eus
-
Contact:
- Amanda Lopez Picado
- Email: amanda.lopezpicado@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 55 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women over 18
- single pregnancy
- cephalic presentation
- intact membranes
- unfavorable cervix ( less than 6 Bishop )
- CTGR not reactive decelerative
- Signed informed consent by the patient.
Exclusion Criteria:
- prior Cesarean section or previous uterine surgery .
- Allergy or intolerance to any of the study drugs
- stillbirth
- uterine growth restricted fetuses
- contraindication for vaginal delivery
- Anterior placenta
- Multiparity
- moderate to severe heart disease
- hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
- Suspected chorioamnionitis
- Coagulation disorders
- history of epileptic seizures
- liver or kidney disease
- Cognitive impairment or bad knowledge of Spanish
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Oral misoprostol
Administration of oral misoprostol according to a "3x1" diagram, that is,3 oral doses (1 per hour) and then 1 hour without treatment
|
hourly titrated misoprostol
|
Active Comparator: Vaginal misoprostol
vaginal misoprostol, 25 microgs every 4 hours
|
Administration of 25 microgs every 6 hours, maximum 150 microgr
|
Active Comparator: Vaginal dinoprostone
vaginal dinoprostone, 10 mg during 24 hours (maximum)
|
Vaginal delivery system of 10mg of dinoprostone
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Compare the percentage of women in each group who achieved vaginal delivery within 24 hours after the beginning of administration in each group (oral misoprostol, vaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone)
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
The number of women who manage cervical favorable conditions at 12 hours after the beginning of administration in each group
Time Frame: 12 hours
|
12 hours
|
The number of women who manage cervical favorable conditions at 24 hours after the beginning of administration in each group
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
24 hours
|
The percentage of women in each group who achieved vaginal delivery at 12 hours after the beginning of administration in each group
Time Frame: 12 hours
|
12 hours
|
Compare the number of women who achieve a vaginal delivery in the 3 groups (oral misoprostol, vaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone)
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
24 hours
|
The number of caesarean sections in each group (oral misoprostol, vaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone)
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
24 hours
|
Compare the percentage of women requiring oxytocin in each group
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
24 hours
|
The percentage of women in each group having tachysystole
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
24 hours
|
Compare the number of women suffering from uterine rupture in each group
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
24 hours
|
The percentage of women in each branch having uterine hypertonia
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
24 hours
|
Maternal morbility-mortality among pregnant participants
Time Frame: up to 180 days
|
up to 180 days
|
Compare fetal or neonatal morbility-mortality among the 3 groups
Time Frame: up to 180 days
|
up to 180 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Oihane Lapuente Ocamica, OIHANE.LAPUENTEOCAMICA@osakidetza.eus
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2020
Study Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 12, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
September 16, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 12, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 9, 2018
Last Verified
February 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- DV-MV-MO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Labor, Induced
-
Alexandra Hospital, Athens, GreeceNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedLabor, Induced | Induced; BirthGreece
-
University Hospital, GenevaQIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc; Hologic, Inc.; Pregnolia ACCompletedLabor Onset | Labor, Induced | Labor, Obstetric | Predictive ModelSwitzerland
-
Oslo Metropolitan UniversityVestre Viken Hospital Trust; Oslo University HospitalCompletedLabor, Induced | Induced; BirthNorway
-
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation TrustRecruiting
-
Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando FigueiraUniversidade Federal do Ceará; Instituto de Saúde Elpidio de AlmeidaCompleted
-
University of BotswanaCompleted
-
Jena University HospitalCompleted
-
Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine InstituteMaternidade Escola Assis ChateaubriandCompleted
-
Woman's Health University Hospital, EgyptUnknown
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Completed
Clinical Trials on Oral misoprostol
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCompleted
-
Wenzhou Medical UniversityUnknown
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCompleted
-
University Hospital, ToulouseTerminated
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingPregnancy | Labor | Misoprostol | Nulliparous
-
CHA UniversityCompleted
-
Chinese University of Hong KongRecruitingActive Peptic Ulcer Disease/GI BleedingHong Kong
-
Services Institute of Medical Sciences, PakistanRecruitingInduction of Labour With MisoprostolPakistan
-
Tampere University HospitalHelsinki University Central Hospital; Oulu University HospitalCompleted