Individual Survivorship Program for Ovarian Cancer Patients Based on PROM's and Shared Decision Making

March 10, 2022 updated by: Vejle Hospital

In 2015 the Danish healthcare authorities initiated major changes in the follow-up (FU) program for patients with ovarian cancer. The new FU program argues that there is no effect of routine monitoring, and every patient's FU is now individualized. These changes have caused major concern, especially regarding the omission of routine examinations aimed at detection of recurrence, since clinical symptoms of relapse can be diffuse. Clearly, tools and FU plans to support the patients in feeling safe during FU are of vital importance.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) is a tool to improve the focus on patients' needs, symptoms and preferences. It is also a tool to monitor quality of life (QoL), and side effects.

300 patients with ovarian cancer are planned to be enrolled after primary treatment when they enter follow-up program. This is a multi-center study.

All participants fill in a questionnaire at baseline and then every 3 months for two years, and every 6 months the third year. The questionnaire consists of EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-OV28, and questions on symptoms of relapse. At baseline the questionnaire is extended with demographic issues.

The patients will also fill in a brief questionnaire (CollaboRATE) dealing with patient satisfaction and the level of shared decision making experienced.

All participants are followed for 3 years.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

223

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vejle, Denmark
        • Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient diagnosed with Ovarian Cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients >18 years of age.
  • Histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or serous primary peritoneal cancer.
  • Have completed their first line treatment, with complete remission.
  • Manage to read and speak Danish.
  • Can receive active anti-cancer treatment such as maintenance bevacizumab

Exclusion Criteria:

•Have recurrent disease after first line treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction as measured by combined questionnaires CollaboRATE and Patient Experience.
Time Frame: 3 years.
3 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of life and symptom screening as measured by combined questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC-OV28, and symptom screening questions.
Time Frame: 3 years. Every 3 months for two years and every 6 months the third year.
3 years. Every 3 months for two years and every 6 months the third year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anette S. Kargo, MD, University of Southern Denmark and Vejle Hospital, Denmark
  • Study Chair: Karina D. Steffensen, MD, PhD, Vejle Hospital, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

3
Subscribe