Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide and Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate in Stabile COPD Patients (AVANT)

March 25, 2025 updated by: AstraZeneca

A 24-week Treatment, Randomised, Parallel-group, Double Blinded, Double-Dummy, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate Compared With Individual Components and Placebo and Aclidinium Bromide Compared With Placebo When Administered to Patients With Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

This is a multiple dose, randomised, parallel, double blind, double dummy, multicentre and multinational Phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of Aclidinium bromide/Formoterol fumarate compared with individual components and placebo and Aclidinium bromide compared with Placebo when administered to patients with stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1625

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Baotou, China, 14010
        • Research Site
      • Beijing, China, 100050
        • Research Site
      • Beijing, China, 100097
        • Research Site
      • Beijing, China, CN-100083
        • Research Site
      • Beijing, China, 102300
        • Research Site
      • Cangzhou, China, 61000
        • Research Site
      • Changchun, China, 130021
        • Research Site
      • Changsha, China, 430033
        • Research Site
      • Changsha, China, 410005
        • Research Site
      • Chengdu, China, 610072
        • Research Site
      • Guangzhou, China, 510530
        • Research Site
      • Haikou, China, 570311
        • Research Site
      • Hangzhou, China, 310005
        • Research Site
      • Hangzhou, China, 310003
        • Research Site
      • Hangzhou, China, 310014
        • Research Site
      • Hefei, China, 230001
        • Research Site
      • Hefei, China, 230022
        • Research Site
      • Hefei, China, 230061
        • Research Site
      • Hengyang, China, 50012
        • Research Site
      • Hohhot, China, 010017
        • Research Site
      • Liangyugang, China, 222002
        • Research Site
      • Linhai, China, 317000
        • Research Site
      • Nanchang, China, 330006
        • Research Site
      • Nanjing, China, 210009
        • Research Site
      • Qiqihar, China, 161005
        • Research Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Research Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Research Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200062
        • Research Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200090
        • Research Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200040
        • Research Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200240
        • Research Site
      • Shanghai, China, 201200
        • Research Site
      • Shanxi, China, 30001
        • Research Site
      • Shengyang, China, 110004
        • Research Site
      • Shenzhen, China, 518053
        • Research Site
      • Shenzhen, China, 518020
        • Research Site
      • Shijiazhuang, China, 050000
        • Research Site
      • Taiyuan, China, 030001
        • Research Site
      • Tianjin, China, 300050
        • Research Site
      • Wenzhou, China, 325015
        • Research Site
      • Wuxi, China, 214023
        • Research Site
      • Xiamen, China, 361004
        • Research Site
      • Xian, China, 710061
        • Research Site
      • Xining, China, 810007
        • Research Site
      • Yangzhou, China, 225000
        • Research Site
      • Yanji, China, 133000
        • Research Site
      • Yinchuan, China, 750004
        • Research Site
      • Zhanjiang, China, 524001
        • Research Site
      • Ahmedabad, India, 380060
        • Research Site
      • Alappuzha, India, 688524
        • Research Site
      • Ernakulam, India, 683577
        • Research Site
      • Guntur, India, 522001
        • Research Site
      • Jaipur, India, 302006
        • Research Site
      • Kozhikode, India, 673008
        • Research Site
      • Mysore, India, 57002
        • Research Site
      • Nagpur, India, 440012
        • Research Site
      • Nagpur, India, 440010
        • Research Site
      • Nagpur, India, 440019
        • Research Site
      • Pune, India, 411019
        • Research Site
      • Pune, India, 411057
        • Research Site
      • Pune, India, 440012
        • Research Site
      • Vijayawada, India, 520 008
        • Research Site
      • Caloocan City, Philippines, 1400
        • Research Site
      • Iloilo City, Philippines, 5000
        • Research Site
      • Manila, Philippines, 1000
        • Research Site
      • Quezon City, Philippines, 1101
        • Research Site
      • Quezon City, Philippines, 1100
        • Research Site
      • Quezon City, Philippines, 1000
        • Research Site
      • Keelung, Taiwan, 20448
        • Research Site
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40201
        • Research Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 112
        • Research Site
      • Hanoi, Vietnam, 10000
        • Research Site
      • Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 70000
        • Research Site
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 700000
        • Research Site
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 70000
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 130 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Adult male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female patients aged ≥40
  • 2. Patients with a diagnosis of COPD prior to Visit 1 (screening)
  • 3. Patients with moderate to severe stable COPD (Stage II or Stage III) at Visit 1: post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥30% and < 80% and post-bronchodilator FEV1/Forced vital capacity (FVC) < 70%
  • 4. Current or former smokers with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack-years
  • 5. Patients able to perform repeatable pulmonary function testing for FEV1 according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) 2005 criteria at Visit 1(screening)
  • 6. Patients who understand the study procedures and are willing to participate in the study as indicated by signing the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Involvement in the planning and/or conduct of the study (applies to AstraZeneca staff and/or site staff) or patients employed by or relatives of the employees of the site or sponsor.
  • 2. Previous enrolment or randomisation in the present study
  • 3. History or current diagnosis of asthma
  • 4. Any respiratory tract infection (including the upper respiratory tract) or COPD exacerbation (including the mild COPD exacerbation) within 6 weeks prior to screening or during the run-in period
  • 5. Patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation (an emergency room visit for longer than 24 hours will be considered a hospitalization) within 3 months prior to screening and during the run-in period
  • 6. Clinically significant respiratory conditions other than COPD
  • 7. Patients who in the Investigator's opinion may need to start a pulmonary rehabilitation program during the study and/or patients who started/finished it within 3 months prior to screening
  • 8. Use of long-term oxygen therapy (≥15 hours/day)
  • 9. Patient who does not maintain regular day/night, waking/sleeping cycles including night shift workers
  • 10. Clinically significant cardiovascular conditions
  • 11. Patients with Type I or uncontrolled Type II diabetes, uncontrolled hypo-or hyperthyroidism, hypokalaemia, or hyperadrenergic state, uncontrolled or untreated hypertension
  • 12. Patients with QT corrected interval (QTc) using Fridericia formula (QTcF) (QTc=QT/ Duration in milliseconds between two R peaks of two consecutive QRS complexes (RR1/3) >470 msec as indicated in the centralised reading report assessed at Screening (Visit 1)
  • 13. Patients with clinically significant abnormalities in the clinical laboratory tests, ECG parameters (other than QTcF) or in the physical examination at Visit 1 (screening)
  • 14. Patients with abnormal liver function tests defined as Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or total bilirubin ≥ 2.5 times upper limit of normal ranges at screening
  • 15. Patient with known non-controlled history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus and/or active hepatitis
  • 16. Patient with a history of hypersensitivity reaction to inhaled anticholinergic drugs, sympathomimetic amines, inhaled medication or any component thereof
  • 17. Patient with known narrow-angle glaucoma, symptomatic bladder neck obstruction, acute urinary retention, or patients with symptomatic non-stable prostatic hypertrophy
  • 18. History of malignancy of any organ system (including lung cancer), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years other than basal or squamous cell skin cancer
  • 19. Any other serious or uncontrolled physical or mental dysfunction
  • 20. Patients with a history (within 2 years prior to Visit 1 (screening) of drug and/or alcohol abuse that may prevent study compliance based on the Investigator judgment
  • 21. Patients unlikely to be cooperative or cannot comply with the study procedures
  • 22. Patients treated with any investigational drug within 30 days (or 6 half-lives, whichever is longer) prior to screening
  • 23. Patients who intended to use any concomitant medication not permitted by this protocol or who had not undergone the required washout period for a particular prohibited medication
  • 24. Patients unable to give consent, or patients of consenting age but under guardianship, or vulnerable patients
  • 25. Any other conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, might have indicated the patient to be unsuitable for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Inhaled dose-matched placebo, twice per day via Genuair or via Turbuhaler
Experimental: Experimental 1
Aclidinium bromide 400μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg
Inhaled Aclidinium bromide/formoterol Fixed-Dose Combination, twice per day via Genuair
Experimental: Experimental 2
Aclidinium bromide 400 μg
Inhaled Aclidinium bromide 400 μg, twice per day via Genuair
Active Comparator: Comparator
Formoterol fumarate 12 μg
Inhaled Formoterol Fumarate 12 μg, twice per day via Turbuhaler

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
Time Frame: Week 24, 1-hour morning post-dose

Change from baseline in 1-hour morning post-dose FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg compared to Aclidinium bromide at Week 24.

Baseline was defined as the average of the two FEV1 values measure prior to the administration of the first dose of the IP at randomisation visit. If one of the two values was missing, the available one was used as baseline. If both values were missing, the screening pre-bronchodilator value was used.

Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Week 24, 1-hour morning post-dose
Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate
Time Frame: Week 24, morning pre-dose (trough)

Change from baseline in morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg compared to Formoterol fumarate 12 μg at Week 24.

Morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 was defined as the average of the two FEV1 values at morning pre-dose of IP at Week 24. If one value was missing, the remaining was used as the trough value.

Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Week 24, morning pre-dose (trough)
Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide
Time Frame: Week 24, morning pre-dose (trough)

Change from baseline in morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg compared to placebo at Week 24.

Morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 was defined as the average of the two FEV1 values at morning pre-dose of IP at Week 24. If one value was missing, the remaining was used as the trough value.

Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Week 24, morning pre-dose (trough)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1
Time Frame: Week 24, peak

Change from baseline in peak FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg compared to placebo at week 24.

Peak FEV1 was the highest value recorded at Week 24 after morning IP intake.

Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Week 24, peak
Improvements Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score
Time Frame: Week 24

Improvements TDI focal score of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg and Aclidinium bromide 400μg compared to placebo at week 24.

Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) measures severity of breathlessness in symptomatic patients. An impairment severity score is assigned for three components: functional impairment; magnitude of task and magnitude of effort. Focal scores is derived as the sum of individual component scores. TDI focal score ranges from -9 to +9, with negative values indicating a worsening in dyspnoea, 0 showing no change from baseline and positive values associated with a post-baseline improvement.

Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Week 24
Change From Baseline in St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score
Time Frame: Week 24

Change from baseline in SGRQ total score of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg and Aclidinium bromide 400μg compared to placebo at week 24.

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life and perceived well-being. It is composed of 50 items split into 17 parts, from which 3 dimension scores on Symptoms, Activity and Impact are derived. A total score utilising responses to all items can also be derived to assess the overall impact of COPD on quality of life. SGRQ dimension and total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a worse possible health status.

Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 14, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2017

First Posted (Estimated)

January 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the de-identified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD

Clinical Trials on Aclidinium bromide/formoterol Fixed-Dose Combination

Subscribe