The Evaluation Of Bone Width Gain Following Split Crest Technique With Or Without Platelet Rich Fibrin( PRF)

January 31, 2017 updated by: Youssef Emad Zaghloul Meshreky, Cairo University

The Evaluation Of Bone Width Gain Following Split Crest Technique With Or Without PRF In Conjunction With Simultaneous Implant Placement In Narrow Alveolar Ridges: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Split crest technique is a technique for horizontal bone augmentation used in case of narrow alveolar ridges as an alternative to the more aggressive techniques such as onlay bone grafting, guided bone regeneration (GBR) and distraction osteogenesis

The study goal is to evaluate whether if there will be any benefit of using platelet rich fibrin (PRF) with the split crest technique regarding bone width gain and healing response in comparison with split crest technique alone, where PRF is considered an autologous, growth factor containing material which is easy to collect and is of low cost.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Cairo
      • Cairo Governorate, Cairo, Egypt, 11311
        • Faculty of oral and dental medicine, Cairo university
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with at least one missing tooth in the maxillary region
  2. All the selected patients have a bucco-palatal width of the edentulous alveolar ridge from 3.5-5.5mm.
  3. All the selected patients have at least 12 mm residual bone height at the edentulous area
  4. The recipient site of the implant should be free from any pathological conditions.
  5. No diagnosed bone disease or medication known to affect bone metabolism.
  6. Patients who are cooperative, motivated, and hygiene conscious.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients unable to undergo minor oral surgical procedures.
  2. Patients with a history of drug abuse or catabolic drugs.
  3. Patients with a history of psychiatric disorder.
  4. Patients with unrealistic expectations about the esthetic outcome of implant therapy.
  5. Patients with insufficient vertical inter-arch space, upon centric occlusion, to accommodate the available restorative components.
  6. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth.
  7. Patients who have any systemic condition that may contraindicate implant therapy.
  8. Patients who have any habits that might jeopardize the osseointegration process, such as smoking and alcoholism.
  9. Patients with parafunctional habits that produce overload on the implant, such as bruxism and clenching.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control Arm
Split crest without PRF
Narrow ridges are split to increase the ridge width and immediate implants are placed without grafting
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention Arm
Split crest with PRF
Narrow ridges are split to increase the ridge width and immediate implants are placed with PRF closing the gap

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Bone width gain
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 15, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PERIO 3:7:3

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ridge Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Split Crest without PRF

3
Subscribe