SpyGlass in Preoperative Diagnostics of Presumed Main Duct IPMNs: Efficacy and Novel Insights on Complications

May 18, 2021 updated by: Leena Kylanpaa, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Single-operator Peroral Pancreatoscopy in Preoperative Diagnostics of Presumed Main Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Efficacy and Novel Insights on Complications

Distinguishing intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) from other pancreatic cystic lesions is essential as IPMNs bear risk of becoming malignant. Differentiating the main pancreatic duct involving IPMNs (MD-IPMNs) with imaging can be difficult. Single-operator peroral pancreatoscopy (SOPP) has shown to be a promising method offering additional information on suspected lesions in the main pancreatic duct (MD). We aimed to establish the role of SOPP in preoperative diagnostics of presumed MD-IPMNs. A secondary objective was to identify factors that contribute to SOPP-related complications.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this multicenter, partly prospective, but mostly retrospective cohort study, 101 SOPPs were performed due to presumed MD-IPMNs in three centers. As a key outcome, the rate of how often visual appearance of MD, and/or MD flushing liquid samples and biopsies taken during SOPP affected further clinical care, was determined. Secondly, post-SOPP complications according to Cotton consensus criteria, diameter of MD, use of prophylactic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and pancreatic stents, duration of SOPP and timing of pancreatic sphincterotomy (PS) were documented.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Uusimaa
      • Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland, 00029
        • Helsinki University Hospital
      • Lund, Sweden
        • Skåne University Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Karolinska University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Multicenter study, patients from Helsinki University Hospital, Skåne University Hospital and Karolinska University Hospital. All patients underwent single-operator peroral pancreatoscopy due to presumed main duct IPMNs

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical imaging showing suspision of IPMN,.
  • Medical imaging showing dilatation of the pancreatic duct

Exclusion Criteria:

- Malignancy confirmed by previous examinations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Histologic diagnosis given by the collected samples
Time Frame: 1 year
Pathologists report
1 year
Influence in decision-making concerning the patients clinical management
Time Frame: 1 year
Multidisplinary meeting decision after SpyGlass
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post procedural complications emerged after SpyGlass pancreatoscopy
Time Frame: 1 year
According to Cotton criteria
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leena Kylänpää, MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Study Chair: Urban Arnelo, Karolinska University Hospital
  • Study Chair: Niklas Fagerström, Karolinska University Hospital
  • Study Chair: Roberto Valente, Karolinska University Hospital
  • Study Chair: Harri Mustonen, Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Study Chair: Fredrik Swahn, Skåne University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IPMN SpyGlass

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on SpyGlass pancreatoscopy

3
Subscribe