Vasculopathic Injury and Plasma as Endothelial Rescue in Septic Shock (SHOCK) Trial (VIPER-SHOCK)

January 18, 2023 updated by: Jakob Stensballe, MD, PhD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Efficacy and Safety of OctaplasLG® Administration vs. Crystalloids (Standard) in Patients With Septic Shock - a Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Investigator-initiated Pilot Trial

Efficacy and safety of OctaplasLG® administration vs. crystalloids (standard) in patients with septic shock - a randomized, controlled, open-label investigator-initiated pilot trial

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a single center, randomized (1:1, active : standard of care), controlled, open-label, investigator-initiated pilot phase IIa trial in patients with septic shock investigating the efficacy and safety of administrating OctaplasLG® as compared to crystalloids, such as Ringer-Acetate (standard of care) in a total of 40 patients.

40 patients will be enrolled:

  • Patients in the active treatment group (n = 20 patients) will receive OctaplasLG® as volume support according to trial algorithm.
  • Patients in the standard of care group (n = 20 patients) will receive crystalloids, such as Ringer-Acetate, as volume support according to trial algorithm.

All patients will be treated according to the standard ICU care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2200
        • ICU Bispebjerg Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult intensive care patients (age ≥ 18 years) AND
  2. Sepsis, defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection AND
  3. Quick SOFA (qSOFA) with two or more of

    1. Respiratory rate ≥ 22/min
    2. Altered mentation (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 15)
    3. Systolic blood pressure ≤ 100mmHg AND
  4. Septic shock, defined as a clinical construct of sepsis with persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain MAP ≥65 mm Hg and having a serum lactate level >2 mmol/L despite adequate volume resuscitation AND
  5. Requiring infusion of noradrenalin 0.10 mcg/kg/min or more to maintain blood pressure AND
  6. Respiratory failure requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Documented refusal of blood transfusion OR
  2. Treatment with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors < 24h from screening OR
  3. Withdrawal from active therapy OR
  4. Previously within 30 days included in an interventional trial OR
  5. Known IgA deficiency with documented antibodies against IgA OR
  6. Known hypersensitivity to OctaplasLG®: the active substance, any of the excipients (Sodium citrate dihydrate, Sodium dihydrogenphosphate dihydrate or Glycine) or residues from the manufacturing process (Tri (N-Butyl) Phosphate (TNBP) and Octoxynol (Triton X-100)) OR
  7. Known severe deficiencies of protein S OR
  8. Pregnancy (non-pregnancy confirmed by patient being postmenopausal or having a negative urine-hCG) OR
  9. Severe cirrhotic hepatic failure with expected need for treatment with terlipressin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: OctaplasLG
OctaplasLG® is an industrial donor plasma product pooled from 630 -1520 single donor units. It possesses unique features when compared to standard FFP, such as having a standardized concentration of natural pro- and anti-coagulation factors, a standardized volume as well as being pathogen-free.12 Most importantly, the manufacturing method of OctaplasLG® removes immune complexes and cells in several steps of microfiltration. The manufacturing process also inactivates viral, bacterial and prion pathogen by immune neutralization, solvent-detergent treatment and a prion specific ligand affinity chromatography step.
OctaplasLG is given as an infusion when resuscitation fluids are required.
Other Names:
  • Octaplas
Placebo Comparator: Ringer-Acetate
standard of care resuscitation fluid Ringer-acetate is a mixture of electrolytes in water to a slightly hypotonic solution.
Ringer-acetate is given as an infusion when resuscitation fluids are required.
Other Names:
  • Ringer's Acetate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microscan at 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours after baseline
Change in microvascular perfusion from baseline to 24 hours after inclusion as evaluated by sidestream darkfield (SDF; MicroVision Medical, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) imaging technique.
24 hours after baseline
Biomarkers at 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours after baseline
Change in biomarkers indicative of endothelial activation and damage (sE-selectin, syndecan-1, thrombomodulin, VEGFR1, VEGF, nucleosomes) from baseline to 24 hours after inclusion.
24 hours after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
24 hour mortality
Time Frame: 24 hours after inclusion
Difference in 24 hours mortality between patients receiving active treatment (OctaplasLG®) and standard of care (crystalloids such as Ringer-Acetate).
24 hours after inclusion
7 day mortality
Time Frame: 7 days after inclusion
Difference in 7 day mortality between patients receiving active treatment (OctaplasLG®) and standard of care (crystalloids such as Ringer-Acetate).
7 days after inclusion
30 day mortality
Time Frame: 30 days after inclusion
Difference in 30 day mortality between patients receiving active treatment (OctaplasLG®) and standard of care (crystalloids such as Ringer-Acetate).
30 days after inclusion
90 day mortality
Time Frame: 90 days after inclusion
Difference in 90 day mortality between patients receiving active treatment (OctaplasLG®) and standard of care (crystalloids such as Ringer-Acetate).
90 days after inclusion
Length of stay in the ICU
Time Frame: Days, assessed at 30-days and 90-days
The number of days in the ICU after inclusion
Days, assessed at 30-days and 90-days
Days on vasopressors
Time Frame: Days, assessed at 30-days and 90-days
The number of days on vasopressors after inclusion
Days, assessed at 30-days and 90-days
Days on ventilator
Time Frame: Days, assessed at 30-days and 90-days
The number of days on vasopressors after inclusion
Days, assessed at 30-days and 90-days
Transfusion requirements
Time Frame: For the first 7 days after inclusion
Bleeding requiring > 2 RBC / day
For the first 7 days after inclusion
Serious Adverse Reactions at 72 hours
Time Frame: For the first 72 hours after inclusion
Severe adverse reactions, defined as symptomatic thromboembolism and TACO/TRALI
For the first 72 hours after inclusion
Serious Adverse Reactions at day 30
Time Frame: At day 30 after inclusion
Severe adverse reactions, defined as symptomatic thromboembolism and TACO/TRALI
At day 30 after inclusion
Oxygenation
Time Frame: At 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and at day 7 after baseline
As evaluated by the PaO2/FiO2-ratio during the ICU stay
At 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and at day 7 after baseline
RIFLE criteria: Risk, Injury, and Failure, Loss and End-stage kidney disease
Time Frame: For the first 7 days in the ICU
Acute Kidney Injury according to RIFLE criteria
For the first 7 days in the ICU
Renal Replacement Therapy
Time Frame: For the first 7 days after inclusion
recording whether the patient is receiving dialysis or not
For the first 7 days after inclusion

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA)
Time Frame: At 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and at day 7 after baseline
Worst score in a 24 hour period
At 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and at day 7 after baseline
Thrombelastograph (TEG) maximum amplitude at 24 hours
Time Frame: At 24 hours after baseline
Measuring the maximum amplitude (MA) in mm with TEG
At 24 hours after baseline
Thrombelastograph (TEG) maximum amplitude at 48 hours
Time Frame: At 48 hours after baseline
Measuring the maximum amplitude (MA) in mm with TEG
At 48 hours after baseline
Thrombelastograph (TEG) maximum amplitude at 72 hours
Time Frame: At 72 hours after baseline
Measuring the maximum amplitude (MA) in mm with TEG
At 72 hours after baseline
Thrombelastograph (TEG) Functional Fibrinogen maximum amplitude at 24 hours
Time Frame: At 24 hours after baseline
Measuring the maximum amplitude (MA) in mm with TEG Functional Fibrinogen (FF)
At 24 hours after baseline
Thrombelastograph (TEG) Functional Fibrinogen maximum amplitude at 48 hours
Time Frame: At 48 hours after baseline
Measuring the maximum amplitude (MA) in mm with TEG Functional Fibrinogen (FF)
At 48 hours after baseline
Thrombelastograph (TEG) Functional Fibrinogen maximum amplitude at 72 hours
Time Frame: At 72 hours after baseline
Measuring the maximum amplitude (MA) in mm with TEG Functional Fibrinogen (FF)
At 72 hours after baseline
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) score
Time Frame: At 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and at day 7 after baseline
Total score in a 24 hour period based upon platelets, INR, Fibrinogen and D-dimer lab results.
At 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and at day 7 after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Niels E Clausen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, Capitol Region of Copenhagen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VIPER-SHOCK
  • 2017-000427-27 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on OctaplasLG

3
Subscribe