Intravenous and Intraperitoneal Lignocaine for Perioperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Colon Resections

November 2, 2020 updated by: Andrew G Hill, MBChB, MD (Thesis), EdD, FACS, FRACS, University of Auckland, New Zealand

The aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic effects of intraperitoneal lignocaine (IPL) compared with intravenous lignocaine (IVL) after laparoscopic colon resections. We plan to run a 2 group randomized, double blind, clinical trial which will look into morphine consumption as the primary outcome.

Group 1 (IV lignocaine)- IV bolus of lignocaine and a 3 day post operative IV lignocaine infusion. Intra peritoneal (IP) bolus of normal saline + 3 day post operative IP normal saline infusion

Group 2 (IP lignocaine)- IV bolus of normal saline and a 3 day post operative IV normal saline infusion. IP bolus of lignocaine + 3 day post operative IP lignocaine infusion

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Over the last 20 years, laparoscopic colonic surgery has become an accepted first-line treatment for colon cancer. A population-based study showed that laparoscopic colonic resections can be performed with lower hospital costs up to 90 days after discharge when compared to open surgery. Laparoscopic colonic resections have also been associated with fewer postoperative complications and lower mortality.

New Zealand has one of the highest rates of bowel cancer in the world, and it is the second highest cause of cancer deaths in New Zealand. With the implementation of a bowel screening programme in New Zealand, the projected numbers of stage 1 bowel cancers are expected to increase. More avenues to improve perioperative care need to be explored to improve patient outcomes.

Controlling postoperative pain effectively has been shown to reduce the length of hospital stay and improve patient/clinical outcomes. Opioids work as μ-receptor agonists in the spinal cord and brain, and although opioids are excellent at reducing pain, they are associated with nausea, vomiting, dizziness, decreased blood pressure, and urinary retention. Epidurals have been incorporated into Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for controlling post-operative pain. However, epidurals are an invasive procedure with significant side effects such as hypotension, urinary retention, respiratory depression, motor blockade and rarely epidural abscess and meningitis. It has also been shown that up to 30 percent of epidural catheters dislodge, block or leak. These complications have led to a movement towards other regional analgesia techniques which allow local anaesthetic (LA) to target the abdominal wound specifically.

Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic (IPLA) has shown promise in reducing pain after colonic surgery with a meta-analysis9, and a recent IPLA colorectal study conducted at Counties Manukau health showing that it reduces pain and opioid use over and above the effect of an epidural10, which is primarily aimed at the abdominal wound. After an IPLA bolus serum local anaesthetic levels are detectable within 2 minutes. Some studies show reduced early postoperative pain and opioid consumption with intravenous lignocaine infusion alone. The question remains however if there is a benefit from using intraperitoneal local anaesthetic compared to administering it intravenously as the IPLA should block both the intraabdominal wound, via a local action, and the skin wound via a systemic action.. This has been investigated in four studies, however none of these studies compared intravenous local anaesthetic (IVLA) and IPLA for colon resection.

The aim is that, by optimising analgesia regimes using local anaesthetic, we can improve patient experience of pain and recovery thereby achieving an earlier discharge and early recovery from surgery. This has significant economic benefits for all involved.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Auckland, New Zealand
        • Manukau Surgical Centre, Middlemore Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • consecutive consenting patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colonic resections will be recruited from surgical outpatient clinics at Manukau Super Clinic.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under 16 years of age
  • acute colonic resection
  • those with ASA >= 4
  • previous adverse reaction/allergy to local anaesthetic,
  • surgery for rectal lesions which was defined as lesion within 15 cm of the anal verge
  • preoperative systemic steroid dependence
  • hepatic dysfunction, opioid use greater than 6 months
  • a diagnosis of Chronic Pain Syndrome
  • inability to consent or complete data scores in the study questionnaires due to cognitive impairment and/or language barrier.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intraperitoneal Lignocaine
IP Lignocaine
Intravenous bolus of normal saline at induction 3 day postoperative infusion of normal saline administered by ambit pump
Intraperitoneal bolus of lignocaine down first port site. 3 day post operative intraperitoneal infusion of lignocaine via an intraperitoneal line inserted by the surgeon. Infusion will be administered by ambit pump.
Experimental: Intravenous lignocaine
IV lignocaine
Intraperitoneal bolus of normal saline down first port site. 3 day post operative intraperitoneal infusion of normal saline via an intraperitoneal line inserted by the surgeon. Infusion will be administered by ambit pump.
Other Names:
  • Lidocaine
Intravenous lignocaine bolus at induction. 3 day postoperative IV infusion of lignocaine administered by ambit pump
Other Names:
  • Lidocaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine consumption
Time Frame: 3 days
Total morphine consumption at day 3
3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain scores
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12 hours and Postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7
Pain scores using the visual analogue score (VAS)
0, 6, 12 hours and Postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7
Systemic Inflammatory Response (CRP and WBC)
Time Frame: very morning post op starting day 1 until day 4 post op
Blood test
very morning post op starting day 1 until day 4 post op
Systemic Local Anesthetic Level
Time Frame: every morning post op starting day 1 until day 4 post op
Blood test
every morning post op starting day 1 until day 4 post op
Length of stay
Time Frame: Variable measure as it is dependent on the patients recovery after surgery. Cut off 3 weeks
The day that the patient is discharged will be recorded
Variable measure as it is dependent on the patients recovery after surgery. Cut off 3 weeks
Return of bowel function
Time Frame: Variable measure as it is dependent on the patients recovery after surgery. Cut off 3 weeks
Time to flatus, first bowel motion
Variable measure as it is dependent on the patients recovery after surgery. Cut off 3 weeks
Readmissions complications
Time Frame: 30 days post op
Readmissions complications will be recorded up to day 30 post op using the Clavien-Dindo Classification
30 days post op
Surgical recovery scores (SRS)
Time Frame: Up to 60 days post op
SRS questionnaires will be administered at day 1 till discharge then POD 14, 30 and 60
Up to 60 days post op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew G Hill, The University of Auckland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Colon Resection

Clinical Trials on IV Saline bolus and infusion

3
Subscribe