Predictive and Prognostic Value of Cellular Dysoxia Markers After Cardiac Surgery With Extracorporeal Circulation

October 16, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

Comparison of the Predictive and Prognostic Value of Cellular Dysoxia Markers in the Postoperative Period of Cardiac Surgery With Extracorporeal Circulation

The study consist of evaluation in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) setting the ability of PCO2 derived variables (ΔPCO2, ΔPCO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio), compared to lactate and ScVO2 to predict major postoperative adverse events.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with serious morbidity and mortality especially in moderate and high-risk patients. This procedure is associated with systemic inflammatory response as a consequence of cardiopulmonary bypass, surgical insult and genetic background of patients leading to organ injury and worse outcome. This pitfall may be worsened by hemodynamic changes with inadequate hemodynamic management.

During and after CPB, substantial changes in macrocirculation and microcirculation are observed and sustain impairment may result in reduced oxygen delivery and/or impaired oxygen extraction. The main consequence is cellular dysorexia that may trigger postoperative organ dysfunction. Rapid identification of cellular dysorexia and rapid hemodynamic management are therefore among key strategies that may reduce mortality.

In this purpose various marker can be considered. Traditionally lactatemia is considered as surrogate of anaerobic metabolism resulting from ischemia. However it interpretation may be challenging particularly in case of reduced hepatic clearance, use of epinephrine or massive blood transfusion. Venous or central venous oxygenation (S(c)VO2), a surrogate of oxygen extraction that is believed to reflect balance between oxygen delivery and consumption, is considered as an acceptable alternative as it was shown to be associated with organ dysfunction in various clinical setting. Nevertheless ScVO2 suffers from the difficulties to define adequate threshold as very high S(c)VO2 as well as low S(c)VO2 may be associated with poor outcome. Recently PCO2 derived dysorexia and perfusion markers have been shown to be predicting outcome in both septic patient and high risk surgical patient. Central venous to arterial difference in PCO2 (ΔPCO2) a global perfusion index is show to be correlated to microcirculation dysfunction and may reflect impaired tissue perfusion. In high risk non-cardiac surgical patients and in septic patient, ΔPCO2 predicted worse outcome better than S(c)VO2 and lactate. Besides this performance may be improve when using a clinically available surrogate based on ΔPCO2. When anaerobic metabolism occurred as a result of sustained hypoxia, CO2 production increases therefore the respiratory quotient (CO2 production (VCO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2) ratio) increases. VCO2/VO2 can be simplified as ΔPCO2 /Ca-vO2 ratio, where Ca-vO2 is arteriovenous O2 content difference. All these variables have never been compared in cardiac surgery setting and their association with microcirculation impaired is poorly documented. The hypotheses is that ΔPCO2, and ΔPCO2 /Ca-vO2 ratio may better predict major postoperative adverse events than blood lactate and S(c)VO2 after cardiac surgery with CPB.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

330

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nord
      • Lille, Nord, France, 59000
        • Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation CCV Hôpital Cardiologique Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Lille

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in the university hospital of Lille.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years old or more
  • Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass
  • Tip of a central venous catheter positioned in superior vena cava or right atria
  • Arterial catheter correctly positioned

Exclusion Criteria:

  • KDIGO 3 AKI prior to surgery
  • Hepatic insufficiency prior to surgery
  • Extracorporeal life support prior to surgery '
  • Live expectancy lower than 48 hours
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performances of PCO2 derived perfusion markers (ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio) measured 2 hours after CPB to predict major postoperative adverse events (MPAE) in the 48 hours following cardiac surgery.
Time Frame: First 2 days after surgery

Composite outcome defined as:

  • Acute kidney injury (AKI) with KDIGO score of 2 or more
  • Acute myocardial infarction according to the universal definition of acute myocardial ischemia
  • ARDS according to Berlin definition or respiratory failure (P/F ratio < 300 mmHg + need of mechanical ventilation)
  • Stroke or generalized seizure
  • Cardiogenic or distributive shock defined as hypotension (SAP <90 mmHg, MAP< 65 mmHg) and reduced of cardiac index, ejection fraction or worsening of previously known reduce cardiac index or ejection fraction.
  • Revision surgery
  • Hemorrhagic shock
  • Death
First 2 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Performances of PCO2 derived perfusion marker measured ICU admission, 6 and 24 hours after CPB to predict major postoperative adverse events (MPAE) in the 2 and 7 days following cardiac surgery.
Time Frame: 2 and 7 days following cardiac surgery
2 and 7 days following cardiac surgery
Performances of PCO2 derived perfusion marker measured ICU admission, 6 and 24 hours after CPB to predict organ failure (any organ failure with specific SOFA of 2 or more) in the 2 and 7 days after surgery.
Time Frame: 2 and 7 days following surgery
2 and 7 days following surgery
Kinetics and relation of PCO2 derived variables, lactate and ScVO2 in the 24 hours following surgery.
Time Frame: 24 hours following surgery
24 hours following surgery
Association of CO2 derived variables with lactate clearance, vasopressive score and outcome variables (ICU and hospital length of stay, ICU and hospital mortality).
Time Frame: 24 hours following surgery
24 hours following surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Relation of thenar StO2 with vascular occlusion test derived variables and cellular dysorexia and perfusion markers, and their predictive value in postoperative complication after cardiac surgery.
Time Frame: 2 and 7 days following surgery
2 and 7 days following surgery
Association of PCO2 derived variables, lactate, ScVO2, StO2 derived variables with VO2, VCO2 and respiratory quotient (measured using indirect calorimetry).
Time Frame: 24 hours following surgery
24 hours following surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mouhamed MOUSSA, MD, University Hospital, Lille

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NI_2016
  • IRB 00010254 --2016-030 (Other Identifier: IRB number, SFAR)
  • DEC2015-136 (Other Identifier: Cnil number by CHRU Lille)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

3
Subscribe