Treating Cancer-Related Fatigue Through Systematic Light Exposure (Light for Fatigue Study)

June 15, 2022 updated by: William H. Redd, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Treating Cancer-Related Fatigue Through Systematic Light Exposure

Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is the most common cancer side effect and can severely interfere with activities of daily living long after completion of medical treatment. Pharmacologic agents to treat CRF have been studied but there is insufficient evidence to recommend their use. Non-pharmacological interventions for CRF have also been studied but are costly to implement and involve significant patient burden. This study investigates a novel low-cost/ low-burden intervention: systematic light exposure to treat CRF. Two hundred survivors of multiple myeloma and Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma between 1 month and 5 years post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) will be recruited from three medical centers. The light will be administered by a small, personal light glasses daily for 4 weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at five separate time points, including baseline and follow-up. The study will specifically address recommendations made for interventions for CRF from the NCI Clinical Trials Planning meeting (JNCI, 2013).The proposed study will: 1) be the first large multisite study with a carefully delineated comparison condition to investigate the effects of light on CRF among ASCT survivors; 2) focus on a distinct, homogenous patient population; 3) include only survivors who experience clinical levels of CRF; and 4) address possible psychological and biological mechanisms. This study will have major public health relevance as it will determine if an easy-to-deliver, inexpensive, and low patient burden intervention effectively reduces CRF.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) will investigate a novel intervention, systematic light exposure (sLE), to treat cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is persistent exhaustion related to cancer and/or its treatment. CRF is the most common cancer side effect and can severely interfere with activities of daily living long after completion of all medical treatment. Pharmacologic agents to treat CRF have been studied but there is insufficient evidence to recommend their use. Non-pharmacological interventions for CRF (including yoga, cognitive behavior therapy, hypnosis, and exercise) have also been studied; however, such interventions are costly to implement and involve significant patient burden. sLE is a low-cost, low- burden intervention that we have found to have beneficial effects for patients post-ASCT. The investigators initial randomized trial for CRF found that certain light exposure was associated with clinically significant reductions in fatigue (effect size d=0.98) More relevant to the proposed research is the preliminary investigation with sLE to treat CRF in MM and DLBCL which found that patients receiving certain sLE reported significantly less fatigue ( p=0.052). The proposed RCT will test the efficacy of sLE on CRF. It will also assess the effect of sLE on sleep, depressive symptoms, and both activity and cortisol circadian rhythms as these related processes have been hypothesized as possible mechanisms of

sLE's effects on CRF. Two hundred survivors of multiple myeloma and Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma between 1 month and 5 years post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) will be recruited from two medical centers.

The light will be administered by light glasses for 4 weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at five separate time points including baseline and follow-ups.

The researchers' preliminary research has established the feasibility of this proposal. Moreover, in the preliminary research, 75% of participants completed the preliminary trial and data from the light box compliance meters showed that participants used the light boxes 80% of the days that treatment was scheduled. A large sample of fatigued MM and DLBCL ASCT survivors has been identified. The study will specifically address recommendations made for interventions for CRF from the NCI Clinical Trials Planning meeting (JNCI, 2013). It will: 1) be the first large multisite study with a carefully delineated comparison condition to investigate the effects of light on CRF among cancer survivors treated with ASCT; 2) focus on a distinct, homogenous patient population (MM and DLBCL ASCT survivors); 3) include only survivors who experience clinical levels of CRF; and 4) address possible mechanisms. This RCT will have major public health relevance as it will determine if an easy-to-deliver, inexpensive, and low patient burden intervention reduces CRF.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

194

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
        • Hackensack University Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • In remission (partial to complete remission) verified by medical records
  • With a history of ASCT as treatment for hematological malignancies such as MM, DLBCL, and related diseases and who are between one month and five years post-transplant

AND:

-With a score equal to or less than 33 on the FACIT-Fatigue scale (see below)

AND:

-Who are currently over age 18 and were at least age 16 at the time of ASCT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • COVID diagnoses (active COVID-19) at the time of recruitment
  • Under age 18
  • Pregnancy
  • Confounding underlying medical illnesses which may cause fatigue (e.g., severe Anemia not controlled by medication, per self-report corroborated by medical chart review (e.g., Hb<10gm/dl) )
  • Severe sleep disorders (e.g. Narcolepsy)
  • Eye Diseases which limit the ability of light to be processed (e.g., untreated cataracts, glaucoma that causes visual impairment, macular degeneration, blindness, pupil dilation problems or retina damage)
  • Severe psychological impairment (e.g., hospitalization for depressive episode in the past 12 months)
  • Currently employed in night shift work
  • Previous use of light therapy to alleviate fatigue or depressive symptoms
  • Self-reported history of bipolar disorder or manic episodes (which is a contra-indication for light treatment)
  • Severe Psychiatric disorders assessed by the Psychoticism-Paranoia Screener
  • Secondary cancer diagnosis (prior or current) within the past 5 years
  • Plans to travel across meridians during the study

To decrease sample heterogeneity (consistent with JNCI, 2013 recommendations), allogeneic-HSCT survivors will not be eligible for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Light
The experimental systematic light exposure consists of exposure to light to reduce cancer-related fatigue. This group will self-administer 30 minutes of light from commercially available light glasses (AYO) each morning for 4 weeks. The AYO light glasses is a lightweight pair of glasses that emits light from LEDs at a distance of 15 millimeters (15mm, 0.015m) from the eye.
The AYO does not contain UV or infra-red light; the light spectrum begins at approximately 420nm. The circadian-effective AYO is programed at over 100 lux with 470nm frequency and irradiance of 250 qW/cm2, which is 100% intensity level. Irradiance over lux itself with AYO light glasses is believed to be more representative due to light frequency and proximity to the eye. Traditional Lightbox usual measure is Lux , AYO can be seen as comparable to 1,000 lux light box. The device is classified as a device that is safe for the eyes in accordance with the international standard IEC 62471 and is independently certified by TÜV Rheinland. AYO complies with the EU's CE marking (CE EMC EN 55014, EN 61000-4-3) as well as other national regulatory directives. AYO also complies with the United States of America's FCC marking (FCC Title 47, Chapter 1, Part 15, Class B FCC VOC: 47 CFR PART 15 OCT, 2016. CLASS B ANSI C 63.4: 2014) as well as other national marking regulatory directives.
Active Comparator: Comparison Light
The active comparator condition consists of exposure to light to reduce cancer-related fatigue. This group will self-administer 30 minutes of light from commercially available light glasses each morning for 4 weeks.
The comparison group will wear the same AYO glasses, but with a circadian ineffective (sham) light. The circadian-ineffective (sham) is programed at 1% intensity, therefore according to our calculation and checks it is below circadian threshold of 2 lux as specified.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FACIT-Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: 4 Years
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Scale. 13-item scale, each item 0=not at all to 4=very much, with higher score indicating more fatigue
4 Years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: 4 years
Sleep quality measured subjectively by the PSQI. In scoring the PSQI, seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
4 years
Rest/activity cycles
Time Frame: 4 years
Sleep quality measured objectively by actigraphy. Actigraphy is a non-invasive method of monitoring rest/activity cycles.
4 years
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: 4 years

Scoring for All Except Questions 4, 8, 12, and 16:

  • 0 points Rarely or none of the time (< 1 day)
  • 1 point Some or a little of the time (1-2 days)
  • 2 points Occasionally or a moderate amount of the time (3-4 days)
  • 3 points Most or all of the time (5-7 days)

For questions 4, 8, 12, and 16, the scoring is exactly the same except that it is reversed: "Most or all of the time" is scored 0 points, "Rarely or none of the time" is scored 3 points Screening test score ranges are less than 15 = no depression, 15-21 = mild to moderate depression, and over 21 = possibility of major depression.

4 years
Correlation between sLE (or "Experimental Light") and depressive changes
Time Frame: 4 years
Examine whether the effects of sLE on CRF are mediated by changes in depressive symptoms
4 years
Correlation between sLE (or "Experimental Light") and circadian rhythms
Time Frame: 4 years
Examine whether the effects of sLE on CRF are mediated by changes in rest/activity circadian rhythms.
4 years
Correlation between Experimental Light compared with Comparison Light and cortisol circadian rhythm
Time Frame: 4 years
Examine whether the Experimental Light compared with Comparison Light normalizes cortisol circadian rhythms and whether the effects of sLE on CRF are mediated by changes in cortisol circadian rhythms.
4 years
General Anxiety Disorder 7-item questionnaire (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 4 years
The General Anxiety Disorder 7-item questionnaire (GAD-7) is a 7-item questionnaire that asks user to rank how often they have been bothered by seven problems over the past two weeks from "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). The items that users are asked to rank levels of nervousness, anxiousness, relaxing, restlessness, irritability and fearfulness. Full scale from 0-21, with higher score indicating more symptoms.
4 years
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: 4 years
PANAS is a 20-item scale. Each item rated on a 5-point scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely), each subscale from 10-50, with higher score indicating more symptoms.
4 years
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning - PAOFI
Time Frame: 4 years
Patient Assessment of Own Functioning - PAOFI is a 33-item instrument measuring four areas: memory, language and communication, motor/sensory-perceptual, higher level cognitive, and intellectual functions. Each item is rated from 0 (almost never) to 5 (almost always) for experiencing difficulty. Subscales: memory (0-45), language and communication (0-40), sensory-motor (0-25), intellectual (0-45), with total scale 0-155, with higher score indicating lower functioning
4 years
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form
Time Frame: 4 years
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form is a 30-item scale, each item from 1 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), full scale from 24-95, with higher score indicating higher levels of fatigue
4 years
The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)
Time Frame: 4 years
The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) is a 21 item self-report inventory measuring the severity of depression. Scoring is from 0 (minimal) to 3 (severe), with total score from 0-63. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
4 years
Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R)
Time Frame: 4 years
Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R) A 22-item self-report questionnaire measuring PTSD symptoms. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). The IES-R yields a total score ranging from 0 - 88 with higher score indicating more impact. Not a tool for diagnosis
4 years
Self Compassion Scale -SCS
Time Frame: 4 years
Self Compassion Scale -SCS - 26-item instrument, full score from 1-5, with higher score indicating higher self compassion
4 years
Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18)
Time Frame: 4 years
Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) - self-report 18-item instrument. Scores on the 18 items are summarized on the Global Severity Index. Raw scores are converted to t-scores.
4 years
Posttraumatic Growth Inventory - (PTGI) Short Form
Time Frame: 4 years
Posttraumatic Growth Inventory - (PTGI) Short Form - 10-item instrument, each item scored 0 (no change) to 5 (great degree change), full scale from 0-50, with higher score indicating greater growth.
4 years
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10)
Time Frame: 4 years
The CD-RISC-10 is a 10 item ordinal scale rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (not true at all) to 4 (true nearly all the time). Full scale from 0-40, with higher scores reflecting greater resilience.
4 years
The Social Constraints Scale (SCS)
Time Frame: 4 years
The Social Constraints Scale (SCS) - The SCS is a 15-item measure that reflects social conditions which cause a trauma survivor to feel unsupported, misunderstood, or otherwise alienated from their social network when they are seeking social support or attempting to express trauma-related thoughts, feelings, or concerns. Each item is scored 1 (never) to 4 (always). Full scale from 15-60, with higher score indicating the more often the person perceive they must inhibit themselves from expressing trauma-related thoughts and feelings to others.
4 years
C/E- Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 years
C/E- Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire - A scale measuring treatment expectancy and rationale credibility for use in clinical outcome studies. Full scale from 0-10, with higher score indicating higher treatment expectancy
4 years
The Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 - (ASI-3)
Time Frame: 4 years
The Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 - (ASI-3) is an 18 item measure, each item from 0 (very little) to 4 (very much), there are 3 subscales (physical, cognitive, and social) with each subscale range from 0-24 and the full scale range from 0 - 72, with higher scale indicating higher agreement.
4 years
MEQ- SA - Morningness Eveningness Questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 years
MEQ- SA - Morningness Eveningness Questionnaire is a 19 item self-rated instrument to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Full scale from 16-86, with higher score indicating the more the human circadian rhythm is of morning type.
4 years
Perceive Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: 4 years
Perceive Stress Scale (PSS) - A 10-item questionnaire, each item scored 0 (never) to 4 (very often), full scale from 0-40, with higher score indicating higher perceived stress.
4 years
Social Provision Scale
Time Frame: 4 years
Social Provision Scale - 24 item instrument, each item scored (1) strongly disagree to (4) strongly agree. Full scale from 24 to 96, with higher score indicating higher perception of receiving provision.
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William H Redd, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

Clinical Trials on AYO light glasses (Experimental)

3
Subscribe