Developing and Testing Delicious and Nutritious for the Old People

January 19, 2018 updated by: Arne Astrup, University of Copenhagen

Meals-on wheels may play a major role in contributing to better nourishment and quality of life in older people, thus delaying costly hospitalisation. Still, dwelling, old adults who receive meals-on-wheels are a population at risk of undernutrition leading to a decreased quality of life.

Hypothesis Offering nutritious ELDORADO meals as meals-on-wheels to nursing home residents in 3 months is an effective way to increase quality of life.

Aim To improve quality of life and functional abilities in nursing home residents by offering nutritious ELDORADO meals.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intervention The intervention group (n=50) will receive an optimized menu (in both sensory and nutritious aspects) for 12 weeks. In cooperation with the Copenhagen house of food and sensory staff, 19 main meals and 12 between-meals have been optimized based on nursing home residents' evaluations of sensory aspects. On a daily basis the menu will consist of 1 optimized main meal and 1 optimized between-meal, served for dinner. There will be no selective choice for the elderly. If a participant does not want the daily meal, he will receive another meal from the ordinary menu from the kitchen.

Control In comparison, the control group (n=50) will receive the same menu as the intervention group, however, the meals are not optimized on sensory and nutritious aspects. On a daily basis this menu also includes 1 main meal and 1 between-meal in 12 weeks. If a participant does not want the daily meal, he will receive another meal from the ordinary menu from the kitchen.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hillerod, Denmark, 3400
        • Skovhuset, nursing home

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Living at Skovhuset, nursing home in Hillerød municipality, Denmark.
  • Collecting the "energy-dense diet" "ældrekost" with 40 % fat, with a main meal and a dessert/starter.
  • Able to understand and follow instructions for the procedures of the study.
  • Above 65 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have chewing or swallowing difficulties.
  • Have acute disease or acute change in chronic disease.
  • Living after special nutritional standards e.g. vegetarian, have any food allergies, or if a participant is excluding common foods from their diet because of other reasons.
  • Not able or willing to give informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Sensory optimized meals

Intervention group is receiving:

Popular dishes selected from hospital and meal service menus optimized by sensory experts. Optimization is done with respect to taste, texture and appereance and on nutritional composition of the meals with focus on protein content.

19 main meals and 12 between-meals are optimized and composed to a menu for 12 weeks.
Placebo Comparator: Control

Control group is receiving:

Popular dishes selected from hospital and meal service menus, NOT optimized by sensory experts.

19 main meals and 12 between-meals are optimized and composed to a menu for 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L)
Time Frame: 12 weeks

(EQ-5D-3L) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions (5D): mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels (3L): no problems (1 point), some problems (2 points), extreme problems (3 points).

This gives a total of 245 different health states, adding unconscious and dead.

12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MMSE (mini mental status)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
MMSE-test (mental function) MMSE is the most frequently used cognitive screening test, and has been developed with the aim of measuring cognitive abilities in the elderly and possibly changes in cognitive functioning over time.
12 weeks
Hand grip strenght
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Hand Grip Strenght (HGS) is valid as a measure of mobility in both healthy people and patients and is associated with both physical (strenght of function) and mental (quality of life) aspects of the participant.

HGS will be measured (in kg) with a Jamar 5030J1 Hydraulic Hand Dynanometer. It displays grip force up to 90 kg.

12 weeks
Chair stand
Time Frame: 12 weeks
By means of the modified 30 seconds chair-stand. Participants are asked to fold their arms across their chest and to stand up and sit down on a chair, as many times as possible during 30 seconds. The seat should be a height of at least 43 cm. In the modified version the arm rests are used for assistance or safety.
12 weeks
Diet registration
Time Frame: 4 days
In this study four days of diet registration will be done both in the intervention period and the control period on each participant to compare the energy and protein intake at the ordinary diet and at the project diet (intervention or control).
4 days
Satisfaction with food related life (SWFL)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
SWFL consist of five items that can be measured independently, or grouped into a single dimension. The participants evaluate their degree of agreement, with five statements of answer possibilities (from disagree completely to agree completely), and a higher level means a better SWFL score.
12 weeks
Weight
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The body weight of the participant is measured in the morning in the participants' home on a bathroom scale.
12 weeks
Height
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Height will be measured with a folding ruler.
12 weeks
EVS
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Eating Validation Scheme (EVS) is a Danish nutritional assessment chart, used to assess nutritional intake and risk factors.
12 weeks
Liking
Time Frame: One month in the middle of the intervention

During an evening meal participants will evaluate sensory parameters of the side course and the main meal (appearance, taste and texture) with the counseling of a research assistant.

A 5-point hedonic scale ranging from 1 (dislike very much) to 5 (like very much) with the medium response either like or dislike was chosen.

One month in the middle of the intervention
Compliance
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A compliance sheet (compliance-week-schedule) of each week will be done to register how many times of the week the participant has eaten the project meals and how many times they have eaten something else from the ordinal menu (due to dislike of the ordinal menu or other reasons).
12 weeks
Observations of meals
Time Frame: One month in the middle of the intervention

In order to identify differences in the way the meal is handled and served an observational visit is done on the eight departments of the nursing home. The scheme includes six items:

  • Preparation of the dinner,
  • Tableware and serving,
  • Presentation of the dinner,
  • The food and side dishes,
  • The ambiance during dinner,
  • The role of the staff during dinner. Differences or coincidences from the observations will be found and used as background information to describe the meal situation.
One month in the middle of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Signe Loftager Okkels, Msc, The Nutrition Research Unit, Gentofte University hospital.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 17, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 8, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 8, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-17002835

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

If other researchers are interested in the data, I am planning to share them after publication of the results.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Sensory optimized meals

3
Subscribe