Clinical Investigation of the Clareon® Intraocular Lens (IOL)

July 9, 2020 updated by: Alcon Research

Clinical Investigation of the Clareon® IOL

The objective of this study is to compare visual acuity and adverse event outcomes from the Clareon intraocular lens (IOL) to historical safety and performance endpoint (SPE) rates.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Upon meeting eligibility criteria, subjects were implanted unilaterally (in one eye) with a Clareon IOL. Subjects attended 7 study visits over a period of approximately 13 months, including 1 preoperative screening visit (Visit 0), 1 operative visit (Visit 00), and 5 postoperative visits (Visits 1-5). Visit day calculations for Visits 1-5 were based off of the day of surgery (Visit 00). Primary endpoint data was collected at the final visit (Month 12). Some sites/subjects participated in a Rotational Stability sub-study. For the non-study eye, the investigator followed standard of care regarding the follow-up, surgery, and intraocular lens choice (as applicable). The non-study eye (fellow eye) was not implanted with the Clareon IOL.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

376

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93720
        • Alcon Investigative Site
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95815
        • Alcon Investigative Site
      • San Leandro, California, United States, 94578
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Florida
      • Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States, 33064
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Illinois
      • Orland Park, Illinois, United States, 60467
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Michigan
      • Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States, 48302
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64154
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10013
        • Alcon Investigative Site
      • Poughkeepsie, New York, United States, 12603
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • North Carolina
      • Elizabeth City, North Carolina, United States, 27909
        • Alcon Investigative Site
      • Southern Pines, North Carolina, United States, 28387
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • South Carolina
      • Florence, South Carolina, United States, 29501
        • Alcon Investigative Site
      • Ladson, South Carolina, United States, 29456
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • Alcon Investigative Site
      • Nacogdoches, Texas, United States, 75965
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Wisconsin
      • Appleton, Wisconsin, United States, 54914
        • Alcon Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Planned routine cataract surgery in at least one eye;
  • Calculated lens power within the available range;
  • Willing and able to sign an informed consent statement;
  • Clear intraocular media other than cataract.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any disease or pathology, other than cataract, that is expected to reduce the potential postoperative best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) to a level worse than 0.30 logMAR;
  • Previous corneal surgery;
  • Rubella or traumatic cataract;
  • Ocular trauma, previous refractive surgery;
  • Current or recent use of certain medications as specified in the protocol;
  • Any other ocular or systemic condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, should exclude the subject from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Clareon IOL
Clareon aspheric hydrophobic acrylic monofocal IOL implanted in one eye during routine small incision cataract surgery
Ultraviolet-absorbing and blue light-filtering IOL composed of high refractive-index foldable and flexible acrylic material. IOLs are implantable medical devices intended for long term use over the lifetime of the cataract subject.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of All-implanted Subjects Achieving Monocular Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 0.3 logMAR or Better at Month 12 Postoperative
Time Frame: Month 12 (postoperative)
Visual acuity (VA) of the study eye was assessed with best refractive correction in place under photopic (well-lit) conditions at a distance of 4 meters using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter charts. As pre-specified in the protocol, the percentage of subjects with monocular BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or better at Month 12 was compared to the historical safety and performance endpoint (SPE) rate reported in EN ISO 11979-7:2014. A higher percentage indicates good visual acuity outcomes with most subjects achieving 0.3 logMAR or better.
Month 12 (postoperative)
Percentage of Best-case Subjects Achieving Monocular BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at Month 12 Postoperative
Time Frame: Month 12 (postoperative)
Visual acuity (VA) of the study eye was assessed with best refractive correction in place under photopic conditions at a distance of 4 meters using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter charts. As pre-specified in the protocol, the percentage of subjects with monocular BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or better at Month 12 was compared to the historical safety and performance endpoint (SPE) rate reported in EN ISO 11979-7:2014. A higher percentage indicates good visual acuity outcomes with most subjects achieving 0.3 logMAR or better.
Month 12 (postoperative)
Percentage of Subjects With Adverse Events (Ocular and Nonocular, Serious and Nonserious), Including Secondary Surgical Interventions (SSIs) - Study Eye
Time Frame: Day 0 (operative), up to Month 12 (postoperative)
Adverse events (AEs) were obtained through solicited and spontaneous comments from subjects and through observations by the Investigator. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified in the protocol.
Day 0 (operative), up to Month 12 (postoperative)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Absolute IOL Rotation
Time Frame: Day 0 (operative), Month 6 (postoperative)
IOL rotation was defined as the difference between axis of IOL orientation on the day of surgery and Month 6. IOL rotation and measured with slit-lamp photography. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified in the protocol. A lower number indicates minimal IOL rotation at 6 months.
Day 0 (operative), Month 6 (postoperative)
Mean Absolute IOL Misplacement
Time Frame: Day 0 (operative)
IOL misplacement was defined as the difference between intended axis of placement and actual axis of IOL orientation on day of surgery. IOL misplacement was measured using slit lamp photography. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified in the protocol. A lower number indicates minimal IOL misplacement.
Day 0 (operative)
Mean Absolute IOL Misalignment
Time Frame: Day 0 (operative), Month 6 (postoperative)
IOL misalignment was defined as the summation of IOL misplacement and IOL rotation at Month 6. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified in the protocol. A lower number indicates minimal IOL misalignment at 6 months.
Day 0 (operative), Month 6 (postoperative)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sr. Clinical Trial Lead, CDMA Surgical, Alcon Research, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ILJ466-C001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Clareon aspheric hydrophobic acrylic monofocal IOL

3
Subscribe