The Grandmother Study: Grandmother Initiatives in Family Transformation (GIFT)

October 12, 2022 updated by: Carol M. Musil, Case Western Reserve University

GIFT Web Based Resourcefulness Training for Grandmother Caregivers

CWRU Research Study: Looking for grandmothers living with grandchildren, 18 years of age or younger, to take part in a study to compare methods of dealing with the stress of caregiving to grandchildren. Participants need to have daily access to a computer, complete four surveys online, and be willing to write in a journal every day for a month. Participants will be compensated for their time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized clinical trial that will compare two methods of dealing with stress of grandparent caregiving to grandchildren.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

346

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44140-1140
        • CWRU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Grandmother to one or more grandchildren (age 18 or younger) living in the same home (with or without parents)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Grandmothers to grandchildren who do not share their home
  2. Not a grandmother
  3. Not living in the United States.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1: Cognitive behavioral skills training & 4 wks online journaling

Cognitive behavioral skills' training and 4 weeks of online journaling.

Participants receive cognitive behavioral skills training by online video, then participants must complete a 28 day online journal reflecting on the cognitive skills they used to handle various situations.

Cognitive behavioral skills training and 4 weeks of online journaling
Active Comparator: Arm 2: Reflective journaling training & 4 wks online journaling

Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling.

Participants watch a reflective journaling video and complete a 28 day journal using a different set of prompts to reflect on their days and describe how they handled various situations.

Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling

Training in reflective journaling and 4 weeks of online journaling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: comparison of baseline with 24 weeks post journaling completion
Center for Epidemiologic Disease - Depression Scale (CES-D) Radloff, 1977. Composite item derived from 20 item scale. Individual items are scored on a 4 point likert scale (0-3). Individual items are summed and possible scale scores range from 0-60. Higher scores represent greater depressive symptoms. Scores of 16 or greater are interpreted as indicating an increased risk of diagnosis of clinical depression.
comparison of baseline with 24 weeks post journaling completion
Well Being
Time Frame: comparison of baseline with 24 weeks post journaling
SF 12 individual item: overall self-appraised health. This is a single response item "In general, would you say your health is..." Participants respond on 5 point scale with response options ranging from Poor (1) to Excellent (5). Higher scores indicate better self-appraised health.
comparison of baseline with 24 weeks post journaling
Family Well Being - Composite Score Derived From 12 Items.
Time Frame: comparison of baseline with 24 weeks post journaling
General Family Functioning 12 item subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). Participants respond on a 5 point likert scale. The subscale is the mean of the participant's responses to the 12 items with possible composite scores of 0-5. Higher scores indicate worse family well being.
comparison of baseline with 24 weeks post journaling
SF-12 Mental Health Composite Score
Time Frame: Baseline vs 24 week followup

Normed score generated by vendor-provided software using all 12 items of the SF-12v2 Health Survey. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better mental health.

Note: the SF-12 measures 8 health domains (Physical Function, Bodily Pain, Vitality, Role-Emotional, Role-Physical, General Health, Social Function, Mental Health) across 12 individual response questions. All 12 responses are normed for gender, and country of origin and differentially weighted to calculate scores for both physical and mental health.

Baseline vs 24 week followup
SF-12 Physical Health Composite Score
Time Frame: Baseline vs 24 week followup

Normed score generated by vendor-provided software using all 12 items of the SF-12v2 Health Survey. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better physical health.

Note: the SF-12 measures 8 health domains (Physical Function, Bodily Pain, Vitality, Role-Emotional, Role-Physical, General Health, Social Function, Mental Health) across 12 individual response questions. All 12 responses are normed for gender, and country of origin and differentially weighted to calculate scores for both physical and mental health.

Baseline vs 24 week followup

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carol M Musil, PhD, Case Western Reserve University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Women

Clinical Trials on Cognitive behavioral intervention and journaling

3
Subscribe