Interscalene vs Anterior and Posterior Suprascapular Nerve Block for Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgeries

May 5, 2019 updated by: Changi General Hospital

Randomised, Controlled Trial Comparing Interscalene Versus Anterior and Posterior Approaches of Suprascapular Nerve Block for Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgeries

To compare ISB vs anterior and posterior approaches of suprascapular block in terms of lung function and analgesia

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Interscalene block (ISB) is commonly used to provide pain control for shoulder surgeries. However, it is associated with several side effects, in particular, a high incidence of phrenic nerve blockade.

The suprascapular nerve block (SSB) has been proposed as an alternative to the ISB as it has a lower likelihood of causing phrenic nerve blockade. There are 2 commonly used approaches for the suprascapular nerve block, anterior and posterior. The anterior approach may still result in some degree of impairment of lung function.

The primary aim is to assess the pulmonary function after performance of ISB, aSSB and pSSB. Secondary outcomes are analgesic effects and incidence of adverse effects of these blocks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 529889
        • Changi General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anaesthesia
  • Patients 21 years old and above
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 to 3
  • BMI 18-35 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to give consent or inability to communicate/ cooperate
  • Patients with chronic use of strong opioids (morphine, oxycodone)
  • Patients with allergy to local anaesthetics or any drugs included in the study
  • Patients with contraindications for regional anaesthesia such as coagulopathy
  • Patients with pre-existing neurological deficits in upper limb/ phrenic nerve palsy
  • Patients with pre-existing lung disease (COPD, uncontrolled asthma)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ISB
Interscalene brachial plexus block
ISB block with 0.5% ropivicaine 15mls ( 45mg )
Active Comparator: aSSB
Anterior Suprascapular Block
aSSB block with 0.5% ropivicaine 15mls ( 45mg )
Active Comparator: pSSB
Posterior Suprascapular Block
pSSB block with 0.5% ropivicaine 15mls ( 45mg )

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulmonary function
Time Frame: 2 years
To assess the pulmonary function after performance of interscalene, anterior and posterior approaches to the suprascapular block
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesic effects and complications
Time Frame: 2 years
Analgesic effect (pain scores, opioid consumption, opioid related side effects), degree of motor blockade and incidence of adverse effects of blocks (Horner's syndrome, hoarseness of voice)
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yean Chin Lim, CGH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 11, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017/2459

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

Clinical Trials on ISB

3
Subscribe